Generation of mouse mutants as a tool for functional genomics.

As sequence information becomes available from the Human Genome Project, key developments include systematic methods for assigning function to each of the 100,000 or so genes. Strategies for coping with this sequence information, including microarray analysis and proteomics, will further our understanding of how genes function and interact. Ultimately, however, the simplest way to understand how a gene works is to examine the consequences of interference with its function: mutational analysis. The mouse represents the model organism of choice in the analysis of gene function; close enough to human to represent a satisfactory model organism, yet relatively easy to manipulate at a genetic level. Two complementary approaches, genotype- and phenotype-based, have been established in the mouse genetics and genomics communities to systematically generate new mouse mutations. Genotype-based approaches are advantageous in that molecular analysis of mutations is facilitated. Phenotypic analysis, however, is often assumed based on gene expression patterns, often leading to unexpected results. Phenotype-based approaches do not make prior assumptions about gene function. Often, however, it may be difficult to define the underlying genetic lesion. Progress in each of these approaches will be considered and situations in which they might be mutually beneficial will be investigated.

[1]  Stephen M. Mount,et al.  The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster. , 2000, Science.

[2]  D. Largaespada,et al.  Mouse models of human disease. Part II: recent progress and future directions. , 1997, Genes & development.

[3]  Robert W. Williams A targeted screen to detect recessive mutations that have quantitative effects , 1999, Mammalian Genome.

[4]  Gregory S. Barsh,et al.  Genetics of body-weight regulation , 2000, Nature.

[5]  Eric S. Lander,et al.  Journey to the Center of Biology , 2000, Science.

[6]  Christophe Person,et al.  Disruption and sequence identification of 2,000 genes in mouse embryonic stem cells , 1998, Nature.

[7]  J. Schimenti,et al.  Generation of radiation-induced deletion complexes in the mouse genome using embryonic stem cells. , 1997, Methods.

[8]  D. Simon,et al.  hph-1: a mouse mutant with hereditary hyperphenylalaninemia induced by ethylnitrosourea mutagenesis. , 1988, Genetics.

[9]  Hans Lehrach,et al.  Establishment of a gene-trap sequence tag library to generate mutant mice from embryonic stem cells , 2000, Nature Genetics.

[10]  U. Müller,et al.  Ten years of gene targeting: targeted mouse mutants, from vector design to phenotype analysis , 1999, Mechanisms of Development.

[11]  Kathryn E. Hentges,et al.  The flat-top gene is required for the expansion and regionalization of the telencephalic primordium. , 1999, Development.

[12]  T. L. Chao,et al.  Effects of 5-azacytosine in DNA on enzymic uracil excision. , 1984, Mutation research.

[13]  E. Shimizu,et al.  Genetic enhancement of learning and memory in mice , 1999, Nature.

[14]  Jacqueline N. Crawley,et al.  A Proposed Test Battery and Constellations of Specific Behavioral Paradigms to Investigate the Behavioral Phenotypes of Transgenic and Knockout Mice , 1997, Hormones and Behavior.

[15]  M. Bucan,et al.  Functional genomics in the mouse: phenotype-based mutagenesis screens. , 1998, Genome research.

[16]  K. Durick,et al.  Hunting with traps: genome-wide strategies for gene discovery and functional analysis. , 1999, Genome research.

[17]  P. Nolan,et al.  Towards new models of disease and physiology in the neurosciences: the role of induced and naturally occurring mutations. , 2000, Human molecular genetics.

[18]  E. Lander,et al.  Analysing complex genetic traits with chromosome substitution strains , 2000, Nature Genetics.

[19]  Andras Nagy,et al.  Cre recombinase: The universal reagent for genome tailoring , 2000, Genesis.

[20]  M. Justice,et al.  Mouse alleles: if you've seen one, you haven't seen them all. , 1998, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[21]  Daniel Greenberger An uncertain principal , 2000, Nature.

[22]  E. Fisher,et al.  Behavioral and functional analysis of mouse phenotype: SHIRPA, a proposed protocol for comprehensive phenotype assessment , 1997, Mammalian Genome.

[23]  G. Rubin,et al.  The Role of the Genome Project in Determining Gene Function: Insights from Model Organisms , 1996, Cell.

[24]  W L Russell,et al.  Dose-repetition increases the mutagenic effectiveness of N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea in mouse spermatogonia. , 1985, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  A. Joyner,et al.  Inactivation of the mouse Huntington's disease gene homolog Hdh. , 1995, Science.

[26]  Jeffrey C. Hall,et al.  The timSL Mutant of the Drosophila Rhythm Gene timeless Manifests Allele-Specific Interactions with period Gene Mutants , 1996, Neuron.

[27]  W. Russell,et al.  Frequency and nature of specific-locus mutations induced in female mice by radiations and chemicals: a review. , 1992, Mutation research.

[28]  J. Peters,et al.  Combining mutagenesis and genomics in the mouse--closing the phenotype gap. , 1996, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[29]  M. Capecchi,et al.  Site-directed mutagenesis by gene targeting in mouse embryo-derived stem cells , 1987, Cell.

[30]  P M Nolan,et al.  Random mutagenesis screen for dominant behavioral mutations in mice. , 1997, Methods.

[31]  M. Justice,et al.  Effective chemical mutagenesis in FVB/N mice requires low doses of ethylnitrosourea , 1999, Mammalian Genome.

[32]  D. Carpenter,et al.  N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea mutagenesis of a 6- to 11-cM subregion of the Fah-Hbb interval of mouse chromosome 7: Completed testing of 4557 gametes and deletion mapping and complementation analysis of 31 mutations. , 1999, Genetics.

[33]  M. Doughty,et al.  BAC-mediated gene-dosage analysis reveals a role for Zipro1 (Ru49/Zfp38) in progenitor cell proliferation in cerebellum and skin , 1999, Nature Genetics.

[34]  P. Selby,et al.  Non-breeding-test methods for dominant skeletal mutations shown by ethylnitrosourea to be easily applicable to offspring examined in specific-locus experiments. , 1984, Mutation research.

[35]  K. Alitalo,et al.  Cardiovascular failure in mouse embryos deficient in VEGF receptor-3. , 1998, Science.

[36]  J. Favor,et al.  The induction of forward and reverse specific-locus mutations and dominant cataract mutations in spermatogonia of treated strain DBA/2 mice by ethylnitrosourea. , 1991, Mutation research.

[37]  M. Angelis,et al.  Large scale ENU screens in the mouse: genetics meets genomics. , 1998, Mutation research.

[38]  V. Bolivar,et al.  List of transgenic and knockout mice: behavioral profiles , 2000, Mammalian Genome.

[39]  Tobias Bonhoeffer,et al.  Essential Role for TrkB Receptors in Hippocampus-Mediated Learning , 1999, Neuron.

[40]  D. P. King,et al.  Mutagenesis and mapping of a mouse gene, Clock, essential for circadian behavior. , 1994, Science.

[41]  G. Martin,et al.  An Fgf8 mutant allelic series generated by Cre- and Flp-mediated recombination , 1998, Nature Genetics.

[42]  A. Kasarskis,et al.  A phenotype-based screen for embryonic lethal mutations in the mouse. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  Minoru Tanaka,et al.  Positional Cloning of the Mouse Circadian Clock Gene , 1997, Cell.

[44]  I. Jackson,et al.  Genetic and molecular analysis of chlorambucil-induced germ-line mutations in the mouse. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[45]  Anne-Marie Chang,et al.  Functional Identification of the Mouse Circadian Clock Gene by Transgenic BAC Rescue , 1997, Cell.

[46]  G. Barsh,et al.  The mouse segmentation gene kr encodes a novel basic domain-leucine zipper transcription factor , 1994, Cell.

[47]  Steve D. M. Brown,et al.  Implementation of a large-scale ENU mutagenesis program: towards increasing the mouse mutant resource , 2000, Mammalian Genome.

[48]  M. J. Justice,et al.  Mouse ENU mutagenesis. , 1999, Human molecular genetics.