The interrater and intrarater reliability of the Modified Ashworth Scale in the assessment of muscle spasticity: limb and muscle group effect.

The Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) is a clinical scale used to assess muscle spasticity. While the evidence indicates that the reliability of the MAS is better in the upper limb and in certain distal muscle groups, no investigation has compared the effect of limbs and muscle groups on the MAS reliability. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of limb and muscle group on the reliability of the MAS in patients with spastic hemiplegia. Thirty subjects with upper and lower limb muscle spasticity were recruited for this trial. Two female experienced physiotherapists participated in this examination of reliability, and rated each patient in a randomized order in a single session. For the intrarater reliability, the second rater repeated the test 1 week later. Shoulder adductor, elbow flexor, wrist flexor, hip adductor, knee extensor, and ankle plantar flexor were tested on the hemiplegic side. Results demonstrated moderate inter (kappa=0.514, SE=0.046, p < 0.001) and intrarater (kappa=0.590, SE=0.051, p<0.001) reliability. For the inter and intrarater reliability, the agreement obtained for the upper and lower limb was similar. In the upper limb, the agreement between raters on the distal wrist flexor was significantly higher than the agreement on the proximal shoulder adductor. In the lower limb, there was a similar agreement between raters on the distal ankle plantar flexor and proximal hip adductor. For within rater, the agreement on the proximal and distal muscles of both limbs was not statistically significant. The Modified Ashworth Scale had moderate reliability. The limbs had no effect on the reliability. The agreement on distal wrist flexor in the upper limb was significantly higher between rater than in the proximal shoulder adductor. The agreement obtained with the MAS was not good, which questions the validity of the measurements.

[1]  B. Ashworth PRELIMINARY TRIAL OF CARISOPRODOL IN MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS. , 1964, The Practitioner.

[2]  B. Bobath Adult hemiplegia: Evaluation and treatment , 1978 .

[3]  V. Patterson,et al.  The Ashworth Scale: A Reliable and Reproducible Method of Measuring Spasticity , 1989 .

[4]  R. Young,et al.  Pathophysiology of spastic paresis , 1990 .

[5]  B. Pentland,et al.  Inter‐rater reliability of the modified Ashworth Scale for spasticity in hemiplegic patients , 1992, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[6]  A. Silman,et al.  Statistical methods for assessing observer variability in clinical measures. , 1992, BMJ.

[7]  A. Spaepen,et al.  Inter-rater reliability of the Ashworth scale in multiple sclerosis , 1994 .

[8]  S. Allison,et al.  Reliability of the Modified Ashworth Scale in the assessment of plantarflexor muscle spasticity in patients with traumatic brain injury , 1996, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[9]  P. Neilson,et al.  Spasticity and muscle contracture following stroke. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[10]  A. Jamous,et al.  The inter rater reliability of the original and of the modified Ashworth scale for the assessment of spasticity in patients with spinal cord injury , 1996, Spinal Cord.

[11]  H Rodgers,et al.  A review of the properties and limitations of the Ashworth and modified Ashworth Scales as measures of spasticity , 1999, Clinical rehabilitation.

[12]  A. Ward Assessment of muscle tone. , 2000, Age and ageing.

[13]  H Rodgers,et al.  Biomechanical examination of a commonly used measure of spasticity. , 2001, Clinical biomechanics.

[14]  S. James Contractures in orthopaedic and neurological conditions: a review of causes and treatment , 2001, Disability and rehabilitation.

[15]  G R Johnson,et al.  Outcome measures of spasticity. , 2002, European journal of neurology.

[16]  D. Richardson Physical therapy in spasticity. , 2002, European journal of neurology.

[17]  Ross Zafonte,et al.  Inter- and intrarater reliability of the Ashworth Scale and the Disability Assessment Scale in patients with upper-limb poststroke spasticity. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[18]  P. van Vliet,et al.  Reliability of measurements obtained with the modified Ashworth scale in the lower extremities of people with stroke. , 2002, Physical therapy.

[19]  L. Satkunam Rehabilitation medicine: 3. Management of adult spasticity. , 2003, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[20]  T. Reistetter,et al.  Spasticity: The Misunderstood Part of the Upper Motor Neuron Syndrome , 2004, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[21]  L. Ada,et al.  Loss of strength contributes more to physical disability after stroke than loss of dexterity , 2004, Clinical rehabilitation.

[22]  T. Platz,et al.  Clinical scales for the assessment of spasticity, associated phenomena, and function: a systematic review of the literature , 2005, Disability and rehabilitation.

[23]  Jean-Michel Gracies,et al.  Pathophysiology of spastic paresis. I: Paresis and soft tissue changes , 2005, Muscle & nerve.

[24]  AD Pandyan,et al.  Spasticity: Clinical perceptions, neurological realities and meaningful measurement , 2005, Disability and rehabilitation.

[25]  Shohreh Jalaie,et al.  Ashworth Scales are unreliable for the assessment of muscle spasticity , 2006, Physiotherapy theory and practice.

[26]  G. Sheean,et al.  Upper Motor Neurone Syndrome and Spasticity: Neurophysiology of spasticity , 2008 .

[27]  Garth R. Johnson,et al.  Upper Motor Neurone Syndrome and Spasticity: Clinical Management and Neurophysiology , 2008 .