PowerPoint in Public

When policy issues involve complex technical questions, demonstrations are more likely to marshal charts, graphs, models, and simulations than to mobilize popular movements in the streets. In this paper we analyze PowerPoint demonstrations, the most ubiquitous form of digital demonstrations. Our first set of demonstrations are the PowerPoint presentations made in December 2002 by the seven finalist architectural teams in the Innovative Design competition for rebuilding the World Trade Center. Our second case occurred some blocks away, several months later: Colin Powell's PowerPoint demonstration at the United Nations. We argue that Edward Tufte's denunciation of PowerPoint does not capture the cognitive style made possible by the affordances of this pervasive new technology. On the basis of our case materials, we demonstrate the distinctive morphology of PowerPoint. Its digital character provides affordances (1) that allow heterogeneous materials to be seamlessly re-presented in a single format that (2) can morph easily from live demonstration to circulating digital documents that (3) can be utilized in counter-demonstrations. A careful examination of this widely used technology is critical for understanding public discourse in a democratic society.

[1]  Trevor Pinch,et al.  Analog Days: The Invention and Impact of the Moog Synthesizer , 2002 .

[2]  J. Gibson The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[3]  M. Callon Europe wrestling with technology , 2004 .

[4]  P. Lascoumes,et al.  Agir dans un monde incertain : essai sur la démocratie technique , 2001 .

[5]  J. Jeffries Soldier: The Life of Colin Powell , 2008 .

[6]  Mary E. Hocks,et al.  Eloquent Images: Word and Image in the Age of New Media , 2005 .

[7]  P. Boczkowski Bridging STS and communication studies: Scholarship on media and information technologies , 2007 .

[8]  Claude Rosental De la démo-cratie en Amérique , 2002 .

[9]  Trevor Pinch,et al.  The Uses of Experiment , 1992 .

[10]  D. Stark,et al.  Socio-Technologies of Assembly: Sense-Making and Demonstration in Rebuilding Lower Manhattan , 2005 .

[11]  Edward R. Tufte,et al.  The Cognitive Style of PowerPoint: Pitching Out Corrupts Within , 2003 .

[12]  Ghislaine M. Lawrence The social construction of technological systems: new directions in the sociology and history of technology , 1989, Medical History.

[13]  Mimi Sheller,et al.  Mobile Publics: Beyond the Network Perspective , 2004 .

[14]  Jack Goody,et al.  The interface between the written and the oral , 1989 .

[15]  Mark Zachry,et al.  Communicative Practices in Workplaces and the Professions: Cultural Perspectives on the Regulation of Discourse and Organizations , 2007 .

[16]  I. M. Parker,et al.  Absolute PowerPoint: Can a software package edit our thoughts , 2001 .

[17]  David Woodward,et al.  The printing press as an agent of change , 1980 .

[18]  D. MacKenzie,et al.  Constructing a Market, Performing Theory: The Historical Sociology of a Financial Derivatives Exchange1 , 2003, American Journal of Sociology.

[19]  D. Levasseur,et al.  Pedagogy Meets PowerPoint: A Research Review of the Effects of Computer-Generated Slides in the Classroom , 2006 .

[20]  C. Shalizi The Domestication of the Savage Mind , 2009 .

[21]  U. Eco,et al.  The Future of the Book , 1996 .

[22]  C. Sommerville,et al.  The Nature of the Book: Print and Knowledge in the Making , 1999 .

[23]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change , 1995 .

[24]  Claude Rosental De la dmo-cratie en Amrique: Formes actuelles de la dmonstration en intelligence artificielle , 2002 .

[25]  Richard G. Landon The nature of the book: Print and knowledge in the making , 1999 .

[26]  J. Durlak The Language of New Media , 2002 .

[27]  Jean-Luc Doumont The Cognitive Style of PowerPoint: Slides Are Not All Evil , 2007 .

[28]  M. Callon Introduction: The Embeddedness of Economic Markets in Economics , 1998 .

[29]  M. Gerber Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy , 2005 .

[30]  C. Licoppe La formation de la pratique scientifique : le discours de l'expérience en France et en Angleterre (1630-1820) , 1996 .

[31]  A. Barry Political Machines: Governing a Technological Society , 2001 .

[32]  J. L. Heilbron,et al.  Leviathan and the air-pump. Hobbes, Boyle, and the experimental life , 1989, Medical History.

[33]  T. P. Hughes,et al.  The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology , 1989 .

[34]  B. Latour,et al.  Making Things Public : Atmospheres of Democracy , 2005 .

[35]  Harold Maurice Collins,et al.  Public Experiments and Displays of Virtuosity: The Core-Set Revisited , 1988 .

[36]  Sean Zdenek Avatars of the word: from papyrus to cyberspace , 2000, CSOC.

[37]  John Law,et al.  Putting Facts Together: A Study of Scientific Persuasion , 1982 .

[38]  Nina Wakeford Power Point and the Crafting of Social Data , 2006 .

[39]  D. Macdowell Encomium of Helen , 1982 .

[40]  J. Yates The PowerPoint Presentation and Its Corollaries: How Genres Shape Communicative Action in Organizations , 2004 .

[41]  Kathleen E. Welch,et al.  Electric Rhetoric: Classical Rhetoric, Oralism, and a New Literacy , 1999 .

[42]  J. Crary,et al.  Suspensions of Perception , 1999 .

[43]  A. Johns How to Acknowledge a Revolution , 2002 .