The effects of pattern shape, subliminal stimulation, and voluntary control on multistable visual perception

Spontaneous figure reversal of ambiguous patterns was analyzed in humans. A) With Necker-"cube"-like, or "drum"-like figures, having square or round shaped "front" and "rear" surfaces, and either large or small "depth", the perceptual intervals corresponding to both interpretations of "drum" were longer than those of "cube"; the perceived "depth" of the figures was less relevant for reversal timing (inter-reversal intervals were only slightly longer for the "deeper" figures). Although the shape of "front" and "rear" surfaces is not a crucial geometrical feature for figure reversal, it did influence its timing. More, or longer information-processing steps should probably be needed for perceptual representations of curvilinear patterns in comparison with rectangular ones. The underlying neural mechanisms are probably located at a relatively peripheral level in the visual system. B) With a modified Necker "cube"-like figure, having the two internal vertices coincident, and the long axis of the figure aligned horizontally, the effect of voluntary control on perception-reversal timing overcomes opposite effects due to either fixation-attention to pattern's focal zones, or subliminal stimulation by the pattern's biased versions, suggesting one or the other perception's possibility, while it is enhanced by concordant imagery. Voluntary control should intervene downward at a high-level processing, and should probably affect both a decision-making and a perception-stabilizing mechanism in the process of the pattern's unconscious interpretation. Results A and B are confronted with other results on both perceptual and binocular rivalry of up-to-date literature, in the frame of discussions on low-level bottom-up automatic stimulus-driven processing vs high-level top-down covert attention-driven processing.

[1]  R. Liebert,et al.  Voluntary Control of Reversible Figures , 1985, Perceptual and motor skills.

[2]  E. Caianiello,et al.  A model for non-resolvable ambiguities , 1978, Biological Cybernetics.

[3]  J. Lindstrom Probing nicotinic acetylcholine receptors with monoclonal antibodies , 1986, Trends in Neurosciences.

[4]  Michael A. Pitts,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of perceptual reversals for three different types of multistable images. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[5]  G. J. Brouwer,et al.  Voluntary control and the dynamics of perceptual bi-stability , 2005, Vision Research.

[6]  Thomas C. Toppino,et al.  Reversible-figure perception: Mechanisms of intentional control , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  E Başar,et al.  Frontal gamma-band enhancement during multistable visual perception. , 1996, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[8]  Laurie A. Miller,et al.  Perceptual flexibility after frontal or temporal lobectomy , 1994, Neuropsychologia.

[9]  Zijiang J. He,et al.  A Distributed Intercortical Processing of Binocular Rivalry: Psychophysical Evidence , 2003, Perception.

[10]  C. Taddei-Ferretti,et al.  Non-linearity of the interactions between bottom-up and top-down signals in multistable visual perception , 1995 .

[11]  J. Harris,et al.  Effects of Chlorpromazine and Promazine on the Perception of Some Multi-Stable Visual Figures , 1984, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[12]  A. Kertesz,et al.  Microsaccadic eye movements and binocular rivalry , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  L A Owen,et al.  Dichoptic priming effects on ambiguous picture processing. , 1985, British journal of psychology.

[14]  S. Engel,et al.  Interocular rivalry revealed in the human cortical blind-spot representation , 2001, Nature.

[15]  Hermann Haken,et al.  Oscillations in the Perception of Ambiguous Patterns , 1991 .

[16]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Multistable phenomena: changing views in perception , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[17]  Thomas C. Toppino,et al.  Prime time: Fatigue and set effects in the perception of reversible figures , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  Harry G. Frankfurt,et al.  The importance of what we care about: Freedom of the will and the concept of a person , 1971 .

[19]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Neuronal correlates of subjective visual perception. , 1989, Science.

[20]  José Mira,et al.  Foundations and Tools for Neural Modeling , 1999, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[21]  Raymond van Ee,et al.  The role of saccades in exerting voluntary control in perceptual and binocular rivalry , 2006, Vision Research.

[22]  R. M. Gaze Dynamic patterns , 1975, Nature.

[23]  A. Borsellino,et al.  Perceptual Ambiguity and Stability of Reversible Figures , 1986, Perceptual and motor skills.

[24]  Thomas C. Toppino,et al.  Enduring interest in perceptual ambiguity: alternating views of reversible figures. , 2004, Psychological bulletin.

[25]  Sabine Windmann,et al.  Role of the Prefrontal Cortex in Attentional Control over Bistable Vision , 2006 .

[26]  C. Blundo,et al.  Perception of ambiguous figures after focal brain lesions , 1990, Neuropsychologia.

[27]  Miguel A. García-Pérez,et al.  Visual inhomogeneity and eye movements in multistable perception , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[28]  J. O. Robinson The Psychology of Visual Illusion , 1972 .

[29]  V. Virsu,et al.  FACTORS INFLUENCING REVERSALS OF A DOUBLE REVERSIBLE FIGURE , 1997 .

[30]  S. Yantis,et al.  Common neural substrates for the control and effects of visual attention and perceptual bistability. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[31]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Visual competition , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[32]  Tomás Radil,et al.  Reversal of "Cubic" and "Cylindric" Figures , 2007, BVAI.

[33]  G. Shulman Attentional effects on Necker cube adaptation , 1993 .

[34]  Silvia Santillo,et al.  Conscious and Intentional Access to Unconscious Decision-Making Module in Ambiguous Visual Perception , 1999, IWANN.

[35]  C Musio,et al.  EXPLAN--a programming language for complex visual stimuli presentation. , 1994, International journal of bio-medical computing.

[36]  C D Salzman,et al.  Neural mechanisms for forming a perceptual decision. , 1994, Science.

[37]  Eugene Chekaluk,et al.  The Role of eye movements in perceptual processes , 1992 .

[38]  T. Radil,et al.  THE PERCEPTION OF CYLINDRIC AND CUBIC AMBIGUOUS PATTERNS , 1999 .

[39]  Krista L. Horlitz,et al.  Satiation or availability? Effects of attention, memory, and imagery on the perception of ambiguous figures , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[40]  M. Corbetta,et al.  An Event-Related Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of Voluntary and Stimulus-Driven Orienting of Attention , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[41]  John Harris,et al.  Biasing Effects in Ambiguous Figures: Removal or Fixation of Critical Features Can Affect Perception , 1997 .

[42]  R. Blake,et al.  V1 activity is reduced during binocular rivalry. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[43]  Hugh R Wilson,et al.  Computational evidence for a rivalry hierarchy in vision , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  Irving Biederman,et al.  The Role of Edges in Object Recognition by Pigeons , 2005, Perception.

[45]  G. Rees,et al.  Neural correlates of perceptual rivalry in the human brain. , 1998, Science.

[46]  Michael A. Pitts,et al.  Early top-down influences on bistable perception revealed by event-related potentials , 2008, Brain and Cognition.

[47]  A. Borsellino,et al.  Reversal time distribution in the perception of visual ambiguous stimuli , 1972, Kybernetik.

[48]  G. Long,et al.  How to Keep a Reversible Figure from Reversing: Teasing Out Top — Down and Bottom — Up Processes , 2007, Perception.

[49]  N. Kawabata Attention and Depth Perception , 1986, Perception.

[50]  Sabine Windmann,et al.  Role of the Prefrontal Cortex in Attentional Control over Bistable Vision , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[51]  S. Ullman Against direct perception , 1980, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[52]  David A Leopold,et al.  Visual Perception: Shaping What We See , 2003, Current Biology.

[53]  N. Logothetis Single units and conscious vision. , 1998, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[54]  I. Biederman Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. , 1987, Psychological review.

[55]  C. Musio,et al.  Downward processes in the perception representation mechanisms , 1998 .

[56]  André J. Noest,et al.  Attentional control over either of the two competing percepts of ambiguous stimuli revealed by a two-parameter analysis: Means do not make the difference , 2006, Vision Research.

[57]  F. Tong,et al.  Can attention selectively bias bistable perception? Differences between binocular rivalry and ambiguous figures. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[58]  L Stark,et al.  Eye Movements during the Viewing of Necker Cubes , 1978, Perception.

[59]  C. Taddei-Ferretti,et al.  Neuronal Bases And Psychological Aspects Of Consciousness , 1999 .

[60]  Alison Gopnik,et al.  Reversing How to Think about Ambiguous Figure Reversals: Spontaneous Alternating by Uninformed Observers , 2006 .

[61]  J. Hollerbach,et al.  Visual cognition and action , 1990 .

[62]  M. Farah Visual Agnosia: Disorders of Object Recognition and What They Tell Us about Normal Vision , 1990 .

[63]  V. Jousmäki,et al.  Prolonged Latencies of Pattern Reversal Visual Evoked Early Potentials in Alzheimer Disease , 1994, Alzheimer disease and associated disorders.

[64]  P. Goolkasian Ambiguous figures: role of context and critical features. , 1987, The Journal of general psychology.

[65]  R. Blake,et al.  Neural bases of binocular rivalry , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[66]  R. Wilfred George,et al.  The Significance of the Fluctuations Experienced in Observing Ambiguous Figures and in Binocular Rivalry , 1936 .

[67]  T. Radil-Weiss,et al.  Subjective figure reversal in two- and three-dimensional perceptual space. , 1984, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[68]  S. Ullman High-Level Vision: Object Recognition and Visual Cognition , 1996 .

[69]  Alan L. Yuille,et al.  Computational theories of low-level vision , 1990 .

[70]  W. James,et al.  The Principles of Psychology. , 1983 .

[71]  Michael Bach,et al.  Bistable perception -- along the processing chain from ambiguous visual input to a stable percept. , 2006, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[72]  H. Haken,et al.  Oscillations in the perception of ambiguous patterns a model based on synergetics , 1989, Biological Cybernetics.

[73]  C. Taddei-Ferretti,et al.  A vague idea or a testable event , 2002 .

[74]  M Riani,et al.  Effect of Luminance on Perceptual Alternation of Ambiguous Patterns , 1984, Perceptual and motor skills.

[75]  Fred I. Dretske,et al.  Seeing, believing, and knowing , 1990 .

[76]  Daniel Strüber,et al.  Necker cube reversals during long-term EEG recordings: sub-bands of alpha activity. , 2006, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[77]  Katsumi Aoki,et al.  Recent development of flow visualization , 2004, J. Vis..

[78]  H. Haken,et al.  The impact of fluctuations on the recognition of ambiguous patterns , 1990, Biological Cybernetics.

[79]  Thomas J. Ross,et al.  Neuroanatomical dissociation between bottom–up and top–down processes of visuospatial selective attention , 2006, NeuroImage.

[80]  Mary A. Peterson,et al.  Opposed-set measurement procedure: A quantitative analysis of the role of local cues and intention in form perception. , 1983 .

[81]  David M. Sobel,et al.  Ambiguous figure perception and theory of mind understanding in children with autistic spectrum disorders , 2005 .

[82]  Irving Biederman,et al.  Visual object recognition , 1993 .

[83]  C. Musio,et al.  Top-Down Interference in Visual Perception , 1994 .

[84]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Human brain activity during spontaneously reversing perception of ambiguous figures , 1998, 5th IEEE EMBS International Summer School on Biomedical Imaging, 2002..

[85]  Alan W Freeman,et al.  Multistage model for binocular rivalry. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[86]  Hermann von Helmholtz,et al.  Treatise on Physiological Optics , 1962 .

[87]  B. Libet Unconscious cerebral initiative and the role of conscious will in voluntary action , 1985, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[88]  Francesco Ventriglia,et al.  Advances in Brain, Vision, and Artificial Intelligence, Second International Symposium, BVAI 2007, Naples, Italy, October 10-12, 2007, Proceedings , 2007, BVAI.

[89]  T. Radil-Weiss,et al.  Visual pattern interpretable as reversible or figure-background. , 1975, Activitas nervosa superior.

[90]  L. H. Pelton,et al.  Acceleration of reversals of a Necker cube. , 1968, The American journal of psychology.

[91]  Nobuo Kawabata,et al.  Visual fixation points and depth perception , 1978, Vision Research.

[92]  Petra Stoerig,et al.  Varieties of vision: from blind responses to conscious recognition , 1996, Trends in Neurosciences.

[93]  J. Braun,et al.  Perceptual reversals need no prompting by attention. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[94]  Michael Bach,et al.  Early neural activity in Necker-cube reversal: evidence for low-level processing of a gestalt phenomenon. , 2004, Psychophysiology.

[95]  Daniel Strüber,et al.  Voluntary control of Necker cube reversals modulates the EEG delta- and gamma-band response , 2006, Neuroscience Letters.

[96]  Harry G. Frankfurt Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person , 1971 .

[97]  D. Strüber,et al.  Reversal-rate dependent differences in the EEG gamma-band during multistable visual perception. , 2000, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.