Measurement of Refractive State and Deprivation Myopia in Two Strains of Mice

Purpose. The mouse eye has a bright retinal image (f/number <1) but low optical quality (visual acuity about 0.5 cpd) that may render emmetropization unnecessary. However, this species is potentially a powerful model to study eye growth and myopia because its genome can be readily manipulated and has been completely sequenced. We have investigated how precisely eyes of mice can be refracted and tested whether deprivation myopia can be induced by frosted diffusers. Methods. An automated eccentric infrared photorefractor was adapted to refract eyes of two mouse strains—C57BL/6 (B6) and DBA/2 (D2)—during Tropicamide cycloplegia without anesthesia. Axial lengths were measured in highly magnified video images of freshly excised eyes. Plastic hemispherical diffusers were applied between postnatal days and 29 and left attached for 7 or 14 days. Results. (1) Trial lenses ranging from +10 to −10 D produced high correlations between the brightness slope in the pupil and applied lens power (r = 0.81 and r = 0.87), demonstrating reliable refraction. Five repeated measures in 12 eyes showed an average standard deviation of 3.0 D, equivalent to an axial length change <10 &mgr;m (derived from schematic eye modeling). (2) Deprivation produced a significant shift toward myopia, relative to untreated eyes, but only after 14 days and only in B6 mice (p = 0.02 with or p = 0.00038 without one outlier; N = 9). In contrast, DBA/2J were unaffected by occlusion, perhaps due to mutations that target eye, lens, or anterior segment. (3) Both eyes of untreated animals often had axial lengths that differed markedly. Surprisingly, we detected no significant correlation between refractive error and axial length after treatment. Conclusions. The infrared refraction technique is sufficiently sensitive to resolve equivalent changes in axial length of only ±10 &mgr;m in alert mice. Prolonged occlusion produces a significant myopic shift in B6 mice, but not in D2 mice. Even among isogenic B6 mice, the response is variable for reasons that presumably trace back to subtle developmental, environmental, and technical factors.

[1]  S. Judge,et al.  Ocular development and visual deprivation myopia in the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) , 1993, Vision Research.

[2]  A. Laties,et al.  Retinal dopamine and form-deprivation myopia. , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  F. Schaeffel,et al.  Mathematical model of emmetropization in the chicken. , 1988, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[4]  U. Dräger,et al.  Receptive fields of single cells and topography in mouse visual cortex , 1975, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[5]  H. Wässle.  Optical quality of the cat eye. , 1971, Vision Research.

[6]  F. Schaeffel,et al.  Diurnal growth rhythms in the chicken eye: relation to myopia development and retinal dopamine levels , 1993, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[7]  F. Schaeffel,et al.  Defocus-induced changes in ZENK expression in the chicken retina. , 2002, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[8]  Frank Schaeffel,et al.  Light- and focus-dependent expression of the transcription factor ZENK in the chick retina , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[9]  P. de la Villa,et al.  Refractive changes induced by form deprivation in the mouse eye. , 2003, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[10]  T H Roderick,et al.  Essential iris atrophy, pigment dispersion, and glaucoma in DBA/2J mice. , 1998, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[11]  R. Williams,et al.  Genetic dissection of retinal development. , 1998, Seminars in cell & developmental biology.

[12]  F. Schaeffel,et al.  Inter‐individual variability in the dynamics of natural accommodation in humans: relation to age and refractive errors. , 1993, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  Michael F. Land,et al.  The Human Eye: Structure and Function , 1999, Nature Medicine.

[14]  R. Fernald,et al.  Multifocal lenses compensate for chromatic defocus in vertebrate eyes , 1999, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[15]  M. Robinson,et al.  Genetic control of ocular morphogenesis: defective lens development associated with ocular anomalies in C57BL/6 mice. , 1993, Experimental eye research.

[16]  H C Howland,et al.  Laboratory, Clinical, and Kindergarten Test of a New Eccentric Infrared Photorefractor (PowerRefractor) , 2000, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[17]  Frank Schaeffel,et al.  The growing eye: an autofocus system that works on very poor images , 1999, Vision Research.

[18]  R. Williams,et al.  Mouse models for the analysis of myopia: an analysis of variation in eye size of adult mice. , 1999, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[19]  T. T. Norton,et al.  The susceptible period for deprivation-induced myopia in tree shrew , 1998, Vision Research.

[20]  Michael G. Anderson,et al.  Interacting loci cause severe iris atrophy and glaucoma in DBA/2J mice , 1999, Nature Genetics.

[21]  Neville A. McBrien,et al.  Normal development of refractive state and ocular component dimensions in the tree shrew (Tupaia belangeri) , 1992, Vision Research.

[22]  A. Laties,et al.  Validation of laser Doppler interferometric measurements in vivo of axial eye length and thickness of fundus layers in chicks. , 1996, Current eye research.

[23]  Katrina L Schmid,et al.  Emmetropization in chicks uses optical vergence and relative distance cues to decode defocus , 2001, Vision Research.

[24]  L. Reymond.  Spatial visual acuity of the eagle Aquila audax: a behavioural, optical and anatomical investigation , 1985, Vision Research.

[25]  M. Tigges,et al.  Emmetropization in the rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta): birth to young adulthood. , 1999, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[26]  Robert W. Williams,et al.  Natural Variation in Neuron Number in Mice Is Linked to a Major Quantitative Trait Locus on Chr 11 , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  F. Schaeffel,et al.  Changes in retinal and choroidal gene expression during development of refractive errors in chicks. , 2000, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[28]  F. Schaeffel,et al.  Properties of the feedback loops controlling eye growth and refractive state in the chicken , 1991, Vision Research.

[29]  R. Douglas,et al.  Behavioral assessment of visual acuity in mice and rats , 2000, Vision Research.

[30]  P Artal,et al.  Retinal image quality in the rodent eye , 1998, Visual Neuroscience.

[31]  D. G. Green,et al.  Single retinal ganglion cell responses in the dark-reared rat: Grating acuity, contrast sensitivity, and defocusing , 1978, Vision Research.

[32]  Mouse Genome Sequencing Consortium.  Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome , 2002, Nature.

[33]  Josh Wallman,et al.  Chapter 6 Retinal control of eye growth and refraction , 1993 .

[34]  M. Millodot,et al.  Retinoscopy and Eye Size , 1970, Science.

[35]  P. E. Hallett,et al.  A schematic eye for the mouse, and comparisons with the rat , 1985, Vision Research.

[36]  R. Williams,et al.  Eye1 and Eye2: gene loci that modulate eye size, lens weight, and retinal area in the mouse. , 1999, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.