Extracting MRS discriminant functional features of brain tumors

The current challenge in automatic brain tumor classification based on MRS is the improvement of the robustness of the classification models that explicitly account for the probable breach of the independent and identically distributed conditions in the MRS data points. To contribute to this purpose, a new algorithm for the extraction of discriminant MRS features of brain tumors based on a functional approach is presented. Functional data analysis based on region segmentation (RSFDA) is based on the functional data analysis formalism using nonuniformly distributed B splines according to spectral regions that are highly correlated. An exhaustive characterization of the method is presented in this work using controlled and real scenarios. The performance of RSFDA was compared with other widely used feature extraction methods. In all simulated conditions, RSFDA was proven to be stable with respect to the number of variables selected and with respect to the classification performance against noise and baseline artifacts. Furthermore, with real multicenter datasets classification, RSFDA and peak integration (PI) obtained better performance than the other feature extraction methods used for comparison. Other advantages of the method proposed are its usefulness in selecting the optimal number of features for classification and its simplified functional representation of the spectra, which contributes to highlight the discriminative regions of the MR spectrum for each classification task. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  S. Huffel,et al.  MR spectroscopy quantitation: a review of time‐domain methods , 2001, NMR in biomedicine.

[2]  M. Julià-Sapé,et al.  A Multi-Centre, Web-Accessible and Quality Control-Checked Database of in vivo MR Spectra of Brain Tumour Patients , 2006, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[3]  A. W. Simonetti,et al.  Development of a decision support system for diagnosis and grading of brain tumours using in vivo magnetic resonance single voxel spectra , 2006, NMR in biomedicine.

[4]  Heng Tao Shen,et al.  Principal Component Analysis , 2009, Encyclopedia of Biometrics.

[5]  C. R. Deboor,et al.  A practical guide to splines , 1978 .

[6]  Sabine Van Huffel,et al.  The effect of combining two echo times in automatic brain tumor classification by MRS , 2008, NMR in biomedicine.

[7]  Sabine Van Huffel,et al.  An automated quantitation of short echo time MRS spectra in an open source software environment: AQSES , 2007, NMR in biomedicine.

[8]  Pieter Wesseling,et al.  Accurate classification of childhood brain tumours by in vivo ¹H MRS - a multi-centre study. , 2013, European journal of cancer.

[9]  Carlos Sáez,et al.  Compatibility between 3T 1H SV-MRS data and automatic brain tumour diagnosis support systems based on databases of 1.5T 1H SV-MRS spectra , 2011, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[10]  Margarida Julià-Sapé,et al.  MRS quality assessment in a multicentre study on MRS‐based classification of brain tumours , 2008, NMR in biomedicine.

[11]  Hans-Georg Müller,et al.  Functional Data Analysis , 2016 .

[12]  Carles Arús,et al.  Automated classification of short echo time in in vivo 1H brain tumor spectra: A multicenter study , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  J R Griffiths,et al.  Linear discriminant analysis of brain tumour 1H MR spectra: a comparison of classification using whole spectra versus metabolite quantification , 2007, NMR in biomedicine.

[14]  E. Fuster-Garcia,et al.  Classification of single‐voxel 1H spectra of brain tumours using LCModel , 2012, NMR in biomedicine.

[15]  Jan Luts,et al.  Effect of feature extraction for brain tumor classification based on short echo time 1H MR spectra , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  Bjoern H Menze,et al.  Optimal classification of long echo time in vivo magnetic resonance spectra in the detection of recurrent brain tumors , 2006, NMR in biomedicine.

[17]  J. Suykens,et al.  Classification of brain tumours using short echo time 1H MR spectra. , 2004, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[18]  Peter Craven,et al.  Smoothing noisy data with spline functions , 1978 .

[19]  M. Sdika,et al.  Time‐domain semi‐parametric estimation based on a metabolite basis set , 2005, NMR in biomedicine.

[20]  A. Cohen Ten Lectures on Wavelets, CBMS-NSF Regional Conference Series in Applied Mathematics, Vol. 61, I. Daubechies, SIAM, 1992, xix + 357 pp. , 1994 .

[21]  Karl Pearson F.R.S. LIII. On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space , 1901 .

[22]  Sabine Van Huffel,et al.  Multiproject–multicenter evaluation of automatic brain tumor classification by magnetic resonance spectroscopy , 2008, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[23]  G. Bodenhausen,et al.  Principles of nuclear magnetic resonance in one and two dimensions , 1987 .

[24]  Arend Heerschap,et al.  Combination of feature‐reduced MR spectroscopic and MR imaging data for improved brain tumor classification , 2005, NMR in biomedicine.

[25]  Theodoros N. Arvanitis,et al.  A constrained least‐squares approach to the automated quantitation of in vivo 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy data , 2011, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[26]  Sabine Van Huffel,et al.  Brain tumor classification based on long echo proton MRS signals , 2004, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[27]  U. Klose In vivo proton spectroscopy in presence of eddy currents , 1990, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[28]  R. Fisher THE USE OF MULTIPLE MEASUREMENTS IN TAXONOMIC PROBLEMS , 1936 .

[29]  Margarida Julià-Sapé,et al.  The INTERPRET Decision-Support System version 3.0 for evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy data from human brain tumours and other abnormal brain masses , 2010, BMC Bioinformatics.

[30]  S. Provencher Automatic quantitation of localized in vivo 1H spectra with LCModel , 2001, NMR in biomedicine.