Influence of surface and vegetation characteristics on C-band radar measurements for soil moisture content

Soil moisture estimation using microwave remote sensing faces challenges of the segregation of influences mainly from roughness and vegetation. Under static surface conditions, it was found that Radarsat C-band SAR shows reasonably good correlation and sensitivity with changing soil moisture. Dynamic surface and vegetation conditions are supposed to result in a substantial reduction in radar sensitivity to soil moisture. A C-band scatterometer system (5.2 GHz) with a multi-polarization and multi-angular configuration was used 12 times to sense the soil moisture over a tall vegetated grass field. A score of vegetation and soil parameters were recorded on every occasion of the experiment. Three radar backscattering models Viz., Integral Equation Model (IEM), an empirical model and a volume scattering model, have been used to predict the backscattering phenomena. The volume scattering model, using the Distorted Born Approximation, is found to predict the backscattering phenomena reasonably well. But the surface scattering models are expectedly found to be inadequate for the purpose. The temporal variation of soil moisture does show good empirical relationship with the observed radar backscattering. But as the vegetation biomass increases, the radar shows higher sensitivity to the vegetation parameters compared to surface characteristics. A sensitivity analysis of the volume scattering model for all the parameters also reveals that the radar is more sensitive to plant parameters under high biomass conditions, particularly vegetation water content, but the sensitivity to surface characteristics, particularly to soil moisture, is also appreciable.

[1]  Adrian K. Fung,et al.  Backscattering from a randomly rough dielectric surface , 1992, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[2]  F. Ulaby,et al.  Vegetation modeled as a water cloud , 1978 .

[3]  F. Ulaby,et al.  Microwave Backscatter Dependence on Surface Roughness, Soil Moisture, and Soil Texture: Part I-Bare Soil , 1978, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience Electronics.

[4]  Ghassem R. Asrar,et al.  C-band scatterometer measurements of a tallgrass prairie , 1989 .

[5]  M. Mancini,et al.  Retrieving Soil Moisture Over Bare Soil from ERS 1 Synthetic Aperture Radar Data: Sensitivity Analysis Based on a Theoretical Surface Scattering Model and Field Data , 1996 .

[6]  Thomas J. Jackson,et al.  Intercomparisons between passive and active microwave remote sensing, and hydrological modeling for soil moisture , 1993 .

[7]  Pascale C. Dubois,et al.  Measuring soil moisture with imaging radars , 1995, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[8]  Roger H. Lang,et al.  Scattering from thin dielectric disks , 1984 .

[9]  Roger H. Lang,et al.  Electromagnetic backscattering from a sparse distribution of lossy dielectric scatterers , 1981 .

[10]  David M. Le Vine,et al.  A microwave polarimetric scattering model for forest canopies based on vector radiative transfer theory , 1995 .

[11]  David M. Le Vine,et al.  Discrete scatter model for microwave radar and radiometer response to corn: comparison of theory and data , 1994, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[12]  Kamal Sarabandi,et al.  Michigan microwave canopy scattering model , 1990 .

[13]  R. J. Brown,et al.  Mapping of soil moisture from C-band radar images , 1996 .

[14]  L. Prévot,et al.  Estimating the characteristics of vegetation canopies with airborne radar measurements , 1993 .

[15]  Fawwaz Ulaby,et al.  Preliminaly Evaluation of the SIR-B Response to Soil Moisture, Surface Roughness, and Crop Canopy Cover , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[16]  F. Ulaby,et al.  Microwave Backscatter Dependence on Surface Roughness, Soil Moisture, and Soil Texture: Part II-Vegetation-Covered Soil , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience Electronics.

[17]  Roger H. Lang,et al.  Electromagnetic Backscattering from a Layer of Vegetation: A Discrete Approach , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.