On the leaf inclination angle distribution as a plant trait for the most abundant broadleaf tree species in Europe

[1]  Rosalia: an experimental research site to study hydrological processes in a forest catchment , 2021, Earth System Science Data.

[2]  Xi Yang,et al.  TLSLeAF: automatic leaf angle estimates from single-scan terrestrial laser scanning. , 2021, The New phytologist.

[3]  Jan Pisek,et al.  Dataset of leaf inclination angles for 71 different Eucalyptus species , 2020, Data in brief.

[4]  Denis Bastianelli,et al.  TRY plant trait database - enhanced coverage and open access. , 2019, Global change biology.

[5]  Ryan M. Bright,et al.  Evaluation of leaf-level optical properties employed in land surface models , 2019, Geoscientific Model Development.

[6]  C. Leuschner,et al.  Functional Crown Architecture of Five Temperate Broadleaf Tree Species: Vertical Gradients in Leaf Morphology, Leaf Angle, and Leaf Area Density , 2019, Forests.

[7]  Simon D. Jones,et al.  Variation of leaf angle distribution quantified by terrestrial LiDAR in natural European beech forest , 2019, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.

[8]  J. Pisek,et al.  New estimates of leaf angle distribution from terrestrial LiDAR: Comparison with measured and modelled estimates from nine broadleaf tree species , 2019, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology.

[9]  Piermaria Corona,et al.  A dataset of leaf inclination angles for temperate and boreal broadleaf woody species , 2018 .

[10]  B. Bailey,et al.  Rapid measurement of the three-dimensional distribution of leaf orientation and the leaf angle probability density function using terrestrial LiDAR scanning , 2017 .

[11]  The Level II aggregated forest soil condition database links soil physicochemical and hydraulic properties with long-term observations of forest condition in Europe , 2016, Annals of Forest Science.

[12]  C. Rebmann,et al.  Impact of interacting bark structure and rainfall conditions on stemflow variability in a temperate beech-oak forest, central Germany , 2016 .

[13]  Jan Pisek,et al.  Measuring leaf angle distribution in broadleaf canopies using UAVs , 2016 .

[14]  J. Pisek,et al.  Variations of leaf inclination angle distribution with height over the growing season and light exposure for eight broadleaf tree species , 2015 .

[15]  T. Vesala,et al.  SMEAR Estonia: Perspectives of a large-scale forest ecosystem – atmosphere research infrastructure , 2015 .

[16]  Nadine Gobron,et al.  The fourth phase of the radiative transfer model intercomparison (RAMI) exercise: Actual canopy scenarios and conformity testing , 2015 .

[17]  Piermaria Corona,et al.  Structural attributes of stand overstory and light under the canopy , 2015 .

[18]  G. Matteucci,et al.  Simultaneous measurements of above and below canopy ozone fluxes help partitioning ozone deposition between its various sinks in a Mediterranean Oak Forest , 2014 .

[19]  Jan Pisek,et al.  Estimation of foliage clumping from the LAI-2000 Plant Canopy Analyzer: effect of view caps , 2014, Trees.

[20]  Jan Pisek,et al.  Is the spherical leaf inclination angle distribution a valid assumption for temperate and boreal broadleaf tree species , 2013 .

[21]  Andrea Cutini,et al.  Estimation of canopy properties in deciduous forests with digital hemispherical and cover photography , 2013 .

[22]  S. Higgins,et al.  TRY – a global database of plant traits , 2011, Global Change Biology.

[23]  G. Wohlfahrt,et al.  Ecosystem-scale biosphere-atmosphere interactions of a hemiboreal mixed forest stand at Järvselja, Estonia. , 2011, Forest ecology and management.

[24]  J. Pisek,et al.  Estimating leaf inclination and G-function from leveled digital camera photography in broadleaf canopies , 2011, Trees.

[25]  Patrick Gross,et al.  Ten years of fluxes and stand growth in a young beech forest at Hesse, North-eastern France , 2008, Annals of Forest Science.

[26]  S. Ollinger.  Sources of variability in canopy reflectance and the convergent properties of plants. , 2011, The New phytologist.

[27]  Ü. Niinemets.  A review of light interception in plant stands from leaf to canopy in different plant functional types and in species with varying shade tolerance , 2010, Ecological Research.

[28]  Hideki Kobayashi,et al.  How to quantify tree leaf area index in an open savanna ecosystem: A multi-instrument and multi-model approach , 2010 .

[29]  P. Legendre,et al.  A distance-based framework for measuring functional diversity from multiple traits. , 2010, Ecology.

[30]  J. Stinchcombe,et al.  A latitudinal cline and response to vernalization in leaf angle and morphology in Arabidopsis thaliana (Brassicaceae). , 2008, The New phytologist.

[31]  H. Scharr,et al.  A stereo imaging system for measuring structural parameters of plant canopies. , 2007, Plant, cell & environment.

[32]  Zhao-Liang Li,et al.  Comparison of leaf angle distribution functions: Effects on extinction coefficient and fraction of sunlit foliage , 2007 .

[33]  Fernando Valladares,et al.  4 The Architecture of PlantCrowns : From Design Rules to Light Capture and Performance , 2007 .

[34]  Sven Wagner,et al.  Method of segmentation affects leaf inclination angle estimation in hemispherical photography , 2006 .

[35]  Moriyoshi Ishizuka,et al.  Vertical distributions of leaf area and inclination angle, and their relationship in a 46-year-old Chamaecyparis obtusa stand , 2006 .

[36]  M. Matsuoka,et al.  Erect leaves caused by brassinosteroid deficiency increase biomass production and grain yield in rice , 2006, Nature Biotechnology.

[37]  F. Baret,et al.  Review of methods for in situ leaf area index (LAI) determination: Part II. Estimation of LAI, errors and sampling , 2004 .

[38]  A Latitudinal Cline in Leaf Inclination of Dryas octopetala and Implications for Maximization of Whole Plant Photosynthesis , 2003, Photosynthetica.

[39]  Daniel S. Falster,et al.  Leaf size and angle vary widely across species: what consequences for light interception? , 2003, The New phytologist.

[40]  H Sinoquet,et al.  Canopy structure and light interception in Quercus petraea seedlings in relation to light regime and plant density. , 2001, Tree physiology.

[41]  R. Crockford,et al.  Partitioning of rainfall into throughfall, stemflow and interception: effect of forest type, ground cover and climate. , 2000 .

[42]  F. Valladares,et al.  Low leaf-level response to light and nutrients in Mediterranean evergreen oaks: a conservative resource-use strategy? , 2000, The New phytologist.

[43]  Patrick Meir,et al.  Light distribution and foliage structure in an oak canopy , 1999, Trees.

[44]  J. Pontailler,et al.  Validity of leaf areas and angles estimated in a beech forest from analysis of gap frequencies, using hemispherical photographs and a plant canopy analyzer , 1999 .

[45]  Ü. Niinemets.  Adjustment of foliage structure and function to a canopy light gradient in two co-existing deciduous trees. Variability in leaf inclination angles in relation to petiole morphology , 1998, Trees.

[46]  D. A. King,et al.  The Functional Significance of Leaf Angle in Eucalyptus , 1997 .

[47]  P. Tigerstedt,et al.  Photosynthesis and canopy characteristics in genetically defined families of silver birch (Betula pendula). , 1995, Tree physiology.

[48]  Thomas J. Herbert,et al.  VARIATION IN INTERCEPTION OF THE DIRECT SOLAR BEAM BY TOP CANOPY LAYERS , 1991 .

[49]  Exequiel Ezcurra,et al.  Architecture, Light Interception, and Distribution of Larrea Species in the Monte Desert, Argentina , 1991 .

[50]  N. Goel.  Models of vegetation canopy reflectance and their use in estimation of biophysical parameters from reflectance data , 1988 .

[51]  Dennis D. Baldocchi,et al.  Canopy radiative transfer models for spherical and known leaf inclination angle distributions: a test in an oak-hickory forest , 1985 .

[52]  N. Goel,et al.  Simple Beta Distribution Representation of Leaf Orientation in Vegetation Canopies1 , 1984 .

[53]  G. G. M. Millen,et al.  Leaf Angle: An Adaptive Feature of Sun and Shade Leaves , 1979, Botanical Gazette.