Projecting Land-Use Change and Its Consequences for Biodiversity in Northern Thailand

Rapid deforestation has occurred in northern Thailand over the last few decades and it is expected to continue. The government has implemented conservation policies aimed at maintaining forest cover of 50% or more and promoting agribusiness, forestry, and tourism development in the region. The goal of this paper was to analyze the likely effects of various directions of development on the region. Specific objectives were (1) to forecast land-use change and land-use patterns across the region based on three scenarios, (2) to analyze the consequences for biodiversity, and (3) to identify areas most susceptible to future deforestation and high biodiversity loss. The study combined a dynamic land-use change model (Dyna-CLUE) with a model for biodiversity assessment (GLOBIO3). The Dyna-CLUE model was used to determine the spatial patterns of land-use change for the three scenarios. The methodology developed for the Global Biodiversity Assessment Model framework (GLOBIO 3) was used to estimate biodiversity intactness expressed as the remaining relative mean species abundance (MSA) of the original species relative to their abundance in the primary vegetation. The results revealed that forest cover in 2050 would mainly persist in the west and upper north of the region, which is rugged and not easily accessible. In contrast, the highest deforestation was expected to occur in the lower north. MSA values decreased from 0.52 in 2002 to 0.45, 0.46, and 0.48, respectively, for the three scenarios in 2050. In addition, the estimated area with a high threat to biodiversity (an MSA decrease >0.5) derived from the simulated land-use maps in 2050 was approximately 2.8% of the region for the trend scenario. In contrast, the high-threat areas covered 1.6 and 0.3% of the region for the integrated-management and conservation-oriented scenarios, respectively. Based on the model outcomes, conservation measures were recommended to minimize the impacts of deforestation on biodiversity. The model results indicated that only establishing a fixed percentage of forest was not efficient in conserving biodiversity. Measures aimed at the conservation of locations with high biodiversity values, limited fragmentation, and careful consideration of road expansion in pristine forest areas may be more efficient to achieve biodiversity conservation.

[1]  K. Larsen.  An account of the Vegetation of northern Thailand. ‐ Geoecological Research , 1989 .

[2]  Nicholas J. Gotelli,et al.  A Primer of Ecology , 1995 .

[3]  François Bousquet,et al.  Companion modelling to facilitate collective land management by Akha Villagers in Upper Northern Thailand , 2005 .

[4]  T. Ohkubo,et al.  Secondary forest succession after the cessation of swidden cultivation in the montane forest area in Northern Thailand , 2008 .

[5]  Craig R. Allen,et al.  Modeling viable mammal populations in gap analyses , 2001 .

[6]  B. Eickhout,et al.  A multi-scale, multi-model approach for analyzing the future dynamics of European land use , 2008 .

[7]  Mark V. Lomolino.  Species-area and species-distance relationships of terrestrial mammals in the Thousand Island Region , 2004, Oecologia.

[8]  Maureen L. Cropper,et al.  Roads, population pressures, and deforestation in Thailand, 1976-89 , 1997 .

[9]  J. Priess,et al.  Integrated Models of the Land System: A Review of Modelling Approaches on the Regional to Global Scale , 2008 .

[10]  Henrik Andrén,et al.  Effects of habitat fragmentation on Eurasian red squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris) in a forest landscape , 1999, Landscape Ecology.

[11]  Rob Alkemade,et al.  GLOBIO3: A Framework to Investigate Options for Reducing Global Terrestrial Biodiversity Loss , 2009, Ecosystems.

[12]  Y. Trisurat.  Applying Gap Analysis and a Comparison Index to Evaluate Protected Areas in Thailand , 2007, Environmental management.

[13]  Thailand. Kǭng Sētthakit Kānkasēt.  Agricultural statistics of Thailand , 1955 .

[14]  P. Dearden,et al.  Habitat fragmentation in north Thailand: a case study , 2004, Bird Conservation International.

[15]  E. Lambin,et al.  Dynamics of Land-Use and Land-Cover Change in Tropical Regions , 2003 .

[16]  Brian D. Richter,et al.  Conservation of Biodiversity in a World of Use , 1999 .

[17]  R. Shibasaki,et al.  Estimation of Agricultural Productivity and Its Application to Modeling the Expansion of Agricultural Land in Thailand , 1997 .

[18]  Peter H. Verburg,et al.  Comparison of a deductive and an inductive approach to specify land suitability in a spatially explicit land use model , 2007 .

[19]  T. Panayotou,et al.  An econometric study of the causes of tropical deforestation: the case of northeast Thailand. , 1989 .

[20]  PETER H. VERBURG,et al.  Modeling the Spatial Dynamics of Regional Land Use: The CLUE-S Model , 2002, Environmental management.

[21]  U. Oberhauser.  Secondary forest regeneration beneath pine (Pinus kesiya) plantations in the northern Thai highlands: a chronosequence study , 1997 .

[22]  C. O. Delang.  Deforestation in Northern Thailand: The Result of Hmong Farming Practices or Thai Development Strategies? , 2002 .

[23]  R. Biggs,et al.  A biodiversity intactness index , 2005, Nature.

[24]  J A Swets,et al.  Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. , 1988, Science.

[25]  Miles G. Logsdon,et al.  Effects of landuse change on the hydrologic regime of the Mae Chaem river basin, NW Thailand , 2007 .

[26]  J. Franklin.  Biogeography: Introduction to Space, Time, and Life , 2003, The Professional Geographer.

[27]  Andrew P. Dobson,et al.  Conservation and Biodiversity , 1996 .

[28]  K. McGarigal,et al.  FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. , 1995 .

[29]  P. Verburg,et al.  Projecting land use transitions at forest fringes in the Philippines at two spatial scales , 2004, Landscape Ecology.

[30]  J. Gareth Polhill,et al.  Agent-based land-use models: a review of applications , 2007, Landscape Ecology.

[31]  Paul Schot,et al.  Land use change modelling: current practice and research priorities , 2004 .

[32]  Eric Koomen,et al.  Comparing the input, output, and validation maps for several models of land change , 2008 .

[33]  Dazhong Wen.  Land Mosaics: The Ecology of Landscapes and Regions , 1997 .

[34]  John B. Vogler,et al.  Land-Use and Land-Cover Change in Montane Mainland Southeast Asia , 2005, Environmental management.

[35]  K. Overmars,et al.  Combining top-down and bottom-up dynamics in land use modeling: exploring the future of abandoned farmlands in Europe with the Dyna-CLUE model , 2009, Landscape Ecology.

[36]  David M. Theobald.  GIS concepts and ArcGIS methods , 2000 .

[37]  C. Stracey,et al.  Testing island biogeography theory with visitation rates of birds to British islands , 2009 .

[38]  Jean-Christophe Castella,et al.  Combination of process-oriented and pattern-oriented models of land-use change in a mountain area of Vietnam , 2007 .

[39]  Hans Tømmervik,et al.  Predicting Habitat Utilization and Extent of Ecosystem Disturbance by an Increasing Herbivore Population , 2009, Ecosystems.