Visual Grading Assessment of Quantitative Transmission Ultrasound Compared to Digital X-ray Mammography and Hand-held Ultrasound in Identifying Ten Breast Anatomical Structures

Transmission Ultrasound is an imaging modality based on tomographic techniques extended to ultrasound. We have performed 2 paired-reader, paired-subject evaluation visual grading analysis studies comparing transmission ultrasound, digital x-ray mammography and hand-held ultrasound when visualizing ten normal breast anatomic structures. To compare the image quality of the three modalities, multiple readers scored the image quality of transmission ultrasound compared to the other two modalities using an ordinal rating scale. The proportion of breasts where the image quality was rated better on transmission ultrasound was reported for each feature including different ACR BI-RADS® breast density classes. Using x-ray mammography as a comparator, readers scored transmission ultrasound images as equivalent or better in more than 90% of breasts. Using hand-held ultrasound as a comparator, readers scored transmission ultrasound images as equivalent or better in more than 80% of breasts. In the analysis by breast density, there was no significant change in the performance by transmission ultrasound for any density subtype. This study confirms that transmission ultrasound can adequately see all the major anatomical features of the human breast that can be seen by no other routinely used clinical imaging method, including accurately visualizing ductal and glandular tissue detail, even in dense breasts.

[1]  D. Borup,et al.  Non-linear inverse scattering: high resolution quantitative breast tissue tomography. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  G H Glover,et al.  Computerized time-of flight ultrasonic tomography for breast examination. , 1977, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[3]  Matthew A. Lewis,et al.  Imaging Performance of Quantitative Transmission Ultrasound , 2015, Int. J. Biomed. Imaging.

[4]  Linda K. Olson,et al.  Quantitative volumetric breast imaging with 3D inverse scatter computed tomography , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[5]  M Båth,et al.  Visual grading characteristics (VGC) analysis: a non-parametric rank-invariant statistical method for image quality evaluation. , 2007, The British journal of radiology.

[6]  J. Greenleaf,et al.  Clinical Imaging with Transmissive Ultrasonic Computerized Tomography , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  O Smedby,et al.  Visual grading regression: analysing data from visual grading experiments with regression models. , 2010, The British journal of radiology.

[8]  Bilal H. Malik,et al.  Objective breast tissue image classification using Quantitative Transmission ultrasound tomography , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[9]  J A Hanley,et al.  If nothing goes wrong, is everything all right? Interpreting zero numerators. , 1983, JAMA.

[10]  A. Scott,et al.  A simple method for the analysis of clustered binary data. , 1992, Biometrics.

[11]  P. Pattynama,et al.  Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis: basic principles and applications in radiology. , 1998, European journal of radiology.

[12]  L. G. Månsson Methods for the Evaluation of Image Quality: A Review , 2000 .

[13]  Eberhard Ludewig,et al.  Diagnostic imaging – evaluating image quality using visual grading characteristic (VGC) analysis , 2010, Veterinary Research Communications.