Interstitial and transurethral photodynamic therapy of the canine prostate using meso‐tetra‐(m‐hydroxyphenyl) chlorin

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) produces localised necrosis with light after prior administration of a photosensitising drug. Although the technique is promising for small tumours of hollow organs, little work has been done on solid organs like the prostate. We studied the tissue biodistribution and photodynamic effects of meso‐tetra‐(m‐hydroxyphenyl) chlorin (mTHPC), a potent second‐generation photosensitiser, on normal canine prostate in vivo. Using quantitative fluorescence microscopy, the highest concentration of mTHPC in the prostate was seen 24–72 hr after intravenous administration. For PDT, red light (650 nm) was delivered to the prostate by laser fibres inserted via the transurethral or transperineal route under transrectal ultrasound guidance. PDT lesions up to 40 mm in diameter (using 4 fibre sites) were produced, characterised by swelling, inflammatory response and extensive glandular destruction. There was persistent glandular atrophy at 90 days, but no disruption of the main stroma and no change in the ultimate size or shape of the gland. Urethral damage sometimes caused temporary urinary retention, but this resolved by 7 days, and no animal became incontinent. Occasional small lesions were seen in the rectum, but these healed without sequelae and there were no fistulae. Since cancer and normal prostate are likely to respond similarly, PDT has considerable promise for treating cancer confined to the gland as large areas of glandular tissue can be necrosed with safe healing. Because the structural integrity of the gland is maintained, PDT is unlikely to be of value in the management of benign prostatic hypertrophy. © 1996 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  S. Cohen,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of glandular and stromal compartments in hyperplastic dog prostates: Effect of 5‐alpha reductase inhibitors , 1995, The Prostate.

[2]  J C Kennedy,et al.  NON‐INVASIVE TECHNIQUE FOR OBTAINING FLUORESCENCE EXCITATION AND EMISSION SPECTRA IN VIVO , 1986, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[3]  M. Pantelides,et al.  THE UPTAKE OF PORPHYRIN AND ZINC‐METALLOPORPHYRIN BY THE PRIMATE PROSTATE , 1993, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[4]  T. Tong,et al.  Cancer statistics, 1994 , 1994, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[5]  H. Barr,et al.  THE CONTRASTING MECHANISMS OF COLONIC COLLAGEN DAMAGE BETWEEN PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY and THERMAL INJURY , 1987, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[6]  R W Keck,et al.  The effect of transurethral light on the canine prostate after sensitization with the photosensitizer tin (II) etiopurpurin dichloride: a pilot study. , 1994, The Journal of urology.

[7]  H. Barr,et al.  Photodynamic therapy for colorectal cancer: A quantitative pilot study , 1990, The British journal of surgery.

[8]  R. Miller,et al.  The role of lasers in urology. , 1994, British journal of urology.

[9]  U Althaus,et al.  Effect of drug‐light interval on photodynamic therapy with meta‐tetrahydroxyphenylchlorin in malignant mesothelioma , 1993, International journal of cancer.

[10]  U. Nseyo,et al.  Photodynamic therapy in the management of resistant lower urinary tract carcinoma , 1987, Cancer.

[11]  C. Whitehurst,et al.  Photodynamic therapy for localised prostatic cancer: light penetration in the human prostate gland. , 1990, The Journal of urology.

[12]  S. Bown,et al.  Photodynamic therapy to scientists and clinicians--one world or two? , 1990, Journal of photochemistry and photobiology. B, Biology.

[13]  G. Murphy,et al.  National patterns of prostate cancer treatment by radical prostatectomy: results of a survey by the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer. , 1994, The Journal of urology.

[14]  R. Thisted,et al.  Results of conservative management of clinically localized prostate cancer. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  C. Foote CHAPTER 3 – Photosensitized Oxidation and Singlet Oxygen: Consequences in Biological Systems , 1976 .

[16]  S. C. Chang,et al.  Photodynamic therapy on rat urinary bladder with intravesical instillation of 5-aminolevulinic acid: light diffusion and histological changes. , 1996, The Journal of urology.

[17]  Qun Chen,et al.  Evaluation of prostatic optical properties and tissue response to photodynamic therapy in a canine model , 1994, Other Conferences.

[18]  C Parkes,et al.  Prospective observational study to assess value of prostate specific antigen as screening test for prostate cancer , 1995, BMJ.

[19]  H. Pass,et al.  In vitro photodynamic therapy of human lung cancer: investigation of dose-rate effects. , 1989, Cancer research.

[20]  H. Pass,et al.  Photodynamic therapy in oncology: mechanisms and clinical use. , 1993, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[21]  W C Beckman,et al.  Photodynamic therapy of prostate cancer: an in vitro study. , 1985, The Journal of urology.

[22]  S. Andersson,et al.  Photodynamic therapy of localised prostatic cancer , 1990, The Lancet.

[23]  S. Hancock,et al.  Control of prostate cancer with radiotherapy: long-term results. , 1994, The Journal of urology.

[24]  M. Menon,et al.  Should we treat localized prostate cancer? An opinion. , 1995, Urology.