Intra and inter: regional knowledge spillovers in European Union

Aim of this paper is to investigate the impact of intra-regional and inter-regional knowledge spillovers on regional new knowledge production. Knowledge diffusion in a region and between a pair of regions is definitely influenced by separate factors in a clear way. The most important thing, however, is to test the impact of these factors on knowledge spillovers when they operate, not separately but, simultaneously. We apply a knowledge production function to data for 210 European regions for a 12 years period (1995–2006). Our results indicate that the returns to scale with respect to the main inputs of the KPF, are increasing with the absence of spillovers and decreasing when knowledge spillovers exist. Technological diversity facilitates the creation of new ideas and knowledge. The cross regional technological proximity is positive and statistically significant. The spatial proximity is also positive and statistically significant. However, the simultaneous consideration of the spatial and technological proximity significantly influences the marginal effects of these independent variables on new knowledge creation. Thus, when a region is geographically contiguous to weak innovative systems then the knowledge spillovers are stronger between regions which innovate in similar technological fields. When a region is geographically contiguous to regions with high innovative activity the knowledge spillovers are stronger between regions which innovate in different technological fields. Finally, the location of a recipient region on the technological fields’ trajectory influences the impact of the technological distance on knowledge transfer.

[1]  Dominique Guellec,et al.  From R&D to Productivity Growth: Do the Institutional Settings and the Source of Funds of R&D Matter? , 2004 .

[2]  R. Boschma,et al.  Related variety and regional growth in Spain , 2011 .

[3]  A. Marshall Principles of Economics , .

[4]  Raffaele Paci,et al.  Technological Enclaves and Industrial Districts: An Analysis of the Regional Distribution of Innovative Activity in Europe , 1997 .

[5]  Michael Fritsch,et al.  How does industry specialization affect the efficiency of regional innovation systems? , 2010 .

[6]  J. Hirschberg,et al.  A reinterpretation of interactions in regressions , 2007 .

[7]  Ron Boschma,et al.  Related Variety, Trade Linkages, and Regional Growth in Italy , 2009 .

[8]  D. Doloreux,et al.  What we should know about regional systems of innovation , 2002 .

[9]  L. Anselin,et al.  Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge , 2002 .

[10]  J. Jacobs,et al.  The Economy of Cities , 1969 .

[11]  Erkko Autio,et al.  Evaluation of RTD in regional systems of innovation , 1998 .

[12]  A. Jaffe Demand and Supply Influences in R&D Intensity and Productivity Growth , 1988 .

[13]  M. Feldman,et al.  R&D spillovers and the ge-ography of innovation and production , 1996 .

[14]  S. Winter,et al.  Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development , 1987 .

[15]  L. Bottazzi,et al.  Innovation and Spillovers in Regions: Evidence from European Patent Data , 2002 .

[16]  Ron Boschma,et al.  How Do Regions Diversify over Time? Industry Relatedness and the Development of New Growth Paths in Regions , 2011 .

[17]  F. Tödtling,et al.  One size fits all?: Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach , 2005 .

[18]  Uma Kumar,et al.  NORMALIZED MEASURES OF ENTROPY , 1986 .

[19]  M. Feldman,et al.  Innovation in Cities: Science-Based Diversity, Specialization and Localized Competition , 1999 .

[20]  D. Rodrik,et al.  Economic Development as Self-Discovery , 2002 .

[21]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[22]  Frank van Oort,et al.  Innovation and agglomeration economies in the Netherlands , 2002 .

[23]  P. Romer Endogenous Technological Change , 1989, Journal of Political Economy.

[24]  Piet Rietveld,et al.  The Geography of R&D: Tobit Analysis and a Bayesian Approach to Mapping R&D Activities in the Netherlands , 2000 .

[25]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Patents and R&D at the firm level: A first report , 1980 .

[26]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D , 1989 .

[27]  Lydia Greunz,et al.  Geographically and technologically mediated knowledge spillovers between European regions , 2002 .

[28]  K. Frenken,et al.  Innovation, spillovers, and university-industry collaboration: An extended knowledge production function approach , 2010 .

[29]  P. McCann,et al.  Smart Specialization, Regional Growth and Applications to European Union Cohesion Policy , 2015 .

[30]  Ron Boschma,et al.  Constructing Regional Advantage and Smart Specialisation: Comparison of Two European Policy Concepts , 2014 .

[31]  J. Riley,et al.  The analytics of uncertainty and information: Long-run relationships and the credibility of threats and promises , 1992 .

[32]  Rosina Moreno,et al.  Spatial Spillovers and Innovation Activity in European Regions , 2003 .

[33]  Maryann P. Feldman,et al.  R&D spillovers and recipient firm size , 1994 .

[34]  Lydia Greunz,et al.  Industrial structure and innovation - evidence from European regions , 2004 .

[35]  A. Jaffe Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firms&Apos; Patents, Profits and Market Value , 1986 .

[36]  Maryann P. Feldman,et al.  The Geographic Sources of Innovation: Technological Infrastructure and Product Innovation in the United States , 1994 .

[37]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth , 1979 .

[38]  M. Fritsch,et al.  Innovation, regional knowledge spillovers and R&D cooperation , 2004 .

[39]  D. Rigby The Geography of Knowledge Relatedness and Technological Diversification in U.S. Cities , 2012 .

[40]  Stefano Usai,et al.  Innovation Clusters in the European Regions , 2006 .

[41]  Z. Griliches Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: a Survey , 1990 .

[42]  M. Porter The Competitive Advantage Of Nations , 1990 .

[43]  K. Frenken,et al.  Related Variety, Unrelated Variety and Regional Economic Growth , 2007 .

[44]  Bart Verspagen,et al.  Knowledge Spillovers in Europe: A Patent Citations Analysis , 2002 .

[45]  Gottfried Tappeiner,et al.  Regional knowledge spillovers: Fact or artifact? , 2008 .

[46]  Rajneesh Narula,et al.  A novel approach to national technological accumulation and absorptive capacity: aggregating Cohen and Levinthal , 2002 .

[47]  J. Henderson,et al.  Medium size cities , 1997 .

[48]  A. Jaffe Real Effects of Academic Research , 1989 .

[49]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  The impact of regional absorptive capacity on spatial knowledge spillovers: the Cohen and Levinthal model revisited , 2012 .

[50]  E. Glaeser,et al.  Growth in Cities , 1991, Journal of Political Economy.

[51]  Luigi Orsenigo,et al.  The persistence of innovative activities: A cross-countries and cross-sectors comparative analysis , 2001 .