Relative permeability for two-phase flow through corrugated tubes as model porous media

We report finite-element simulations of gas–liquid two-phase flows through a model porous medium made of corrugated tubes. By resolving the pore-scale fluid dynamics and interfacial morphology, we compute the relative permeability of the porous medium by averaging over a pore-size-distribution of a real porous medium. A constant pressure gradient is applied on both fluids to simulate a pressure-driven creeping flow, and a diffuse-interface model is used to compute the interfacial evolution and the contact line motion. We observe a number of flow regimes in the micro-pores, depending on the pore size, imposed pressure gradient, and other geometric and physical parameters. The flow rates vary nonlinearly with the pressure gradient, and the extended Darcy’s law does not hold in general. The interaction between the two phases, known as viscous coupling, is a prominent feature of the process. As a result, the relative permeability depends not only on saturation, but also on the capillary number, viscosity ratio, wettability of the solid wall, pore geometry, and the initial configuration. The effects of these factors are explored systematically and compared with previous studies.

[1]  A. C. Payatakes,et al.  Flow mechanisms, relative permeabilities, and coupling effects in steady-state two-phase flow through porous media. The case of strong wettability , 1999 .

[2]  James J. Feng,et al.  Diffuse-interface simulations of drop coalescence and retraction in viscoelastic fluids , 2005 .

[3]  James J. Feng,et al.  A diffuse-interface method for simulating two-phase flows of complex fluids , 2004, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[4]  François Kalaydjian,et al.  Origin and quantification of coupling between relative permeabilities for two-phase flows in porous media , 1990 .

[5]  Viscous coupling in two-phase flow in porous media and its effect on relative permeabilities , 1993 .

[6]  Avery H. Demond,et al.  AN EXAMINATION OF RELATIVE PERMEABILITY RELATIONS FOR TWO-PHASE FLOW IN POROUS MEDIA , 1987 .

[7]  M. Muskat,et al.  The Flow of Heterogeneous Fluids Through Porous Media , 1936 .

[8]  D Avraam Flow regimes and relative permeabilities during steady-state two-phase flow in porous media , 1996 .

[9]  James J. Feng,et al.  Wall energy relaxation in the Cahn–Hilliard model for moving contact lines , 2009 .

[10]  Matthew D. Jackson,et al.  Detailed physics, predictive capabilities and macroscopic consequences for pore-network models of multiphase flow. , 2002 .

[11]  J. O. Amaefule,et al.  The Effect of Interfacial Tensions on Relative Oil/Water Permeabilities of Consolidated Porous Media , 1982 .

[12]  Cass T. Miller,et al.  Pore-scale investigation of viscous coupling effects for two-phase flow in porous media. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[13]  F. Skoczylas,et al.  Experimental study of two-phase flow in three sandstones. I. Measuring relative permeabilities during two-phase steady-state experiments , 2002 .

[14]  D. Avraam,et al.  Generalized relative permeability coefficients during steady-state two-phase flow in porous media, and correlation with the flow mechanisms , 1995 .

[15]  Chunfeng Zhou,et al.  Phase-field simulations of interfacial dynamics in viscoelastic fluids using finite elements with adaptive meshing , 2006, J. Comput. Phys..

[16]  Chunfeng Zhou,et al.  Formation of simple and compound drops in microfluidic devices , 2006 .

[17]  A. G. Yiotis,et al.  A lattice Boltzmann study of viscous coupling effects in immiscible two-phase flow in porous media , 2007 .

[18]  Feng-Yuan Zhang,et al.  Liquid Water Removal from a Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cell , 2006 .

[19]  Koji Moriyama,et al.  An approach to modeling two-phase transport in the gas diffusion layer of a proton exchange membrane fuel cell , 2008 .

[20]  Chunfeng Zhou,et al.  3D phase-field simulations of interfacial dynamics in Newtonian and viscoelastic fluids , 2010, J. Comput. Phys..

[21]  Wei Shyy,et al.  A fixed-grid, sharp-interface method for bubble dynamics and phase change , 2001 .

[22]  Daniel H. Rothman,et al.  Lattice‐Boltzmann studies of immiscible two‐phase flow through porous media , 1993 .

[23]  Chunfeng Zhou,et al.  A computational study of the coalescence between a drop and an interface in Newtonian and viscoelastic fluids , 2006 .

[24]  James J. Feng,et al.  Elastic encapsulation in bicomponent stratified flow of viscoelastic fluids , 2008 .

[25]  Chunfeng Zhou,et al.  Sharp-interface limit of the Cahn–Hilliard model for moving contact lines , 2010, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[26]  Mark A. Knackstedt,et al.  The effect of displacement rate on imbibition relative permeability and residual saturation , 2006 .

[27]  James J. Feng,et al.  Interfacial flows in corrugated microchannels: Flow regimes, transitions and hysteresis , 2011 .

[28]  Jie Shen,et al.  An Energetic Variational Formulation with Phase Field Methods for Interfacial Dynamics of Complex Fluids: Advantages and Challenges , 2005 .

[29]  James J. Feng,et al.  Spreading and breakup of a compound drop on a partially wetting substrate , 2010, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[30]  M Muskat,et al.  THE FLOW OF HOMOGENEOUS FLUIDS THROUGH POROUS MEDIA: ANALOGIES WITH OTHER PHYSICAL PROBLEMS , 1937 .

[31]  Liang Hao,et al.  Pore-scale simulations on relative permeabilities of porous media by lattice Boltzmann method , 2010 .

[32]  Xi-Yun Lu,et al.  Relative permeabilities and coupling effects in steady-state gas-liquid flow in porous media: A lattice Boltzmann study , 2009 .

[33]  Ned Djilali,et al.  Computational modelling of polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM) fuel cells: Challenges and opportunities , 2007 .