Towards Supporting Collaborative Spatial Planning: Conceptualization of a Maptable Tool through User Stories

Geographic information-based planning support tools implemented in a maptable have the potential to mediate collaborative spatial planning processes. However, available tools for a maptable either lack advanced analytical functions or have usability shortcomings. Given these limitations, this research aims to conceptualize an interactive planning support tool intended to fully exploit maptable capabilities while providing spatial analytical functions to better support planning and decision-making processes with a larger group of participants. To do so, we conducted a literature review of reported maptable-based applications and semi-structured interviews with identified intended user groups of such applications, and derived Agile user stories. We identified a) principal spatial analyses, b) must-have functionalities, c) required support for individual contributions, and d) preferred space-time settings for group work collaboration, and based on that conceptualized an interactive tool for a maptable. By involving the intended users in the conception of the tool we revealed a discrepancy between the understanding of scholars and developers with respect to what users need and what they do. Intended user groups require tailored but straightforward instruments, rather than complicated or time-consuming models. Our research has laid down the foundation for future maptable tool development to support collaborative planning processes.

[1]  Ron Janssen,et al.  Effectiveness of collaborative map-based decision support tools: Results of an experiment , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[2]  Marco te Brömmelstroet,et al.  Tables, Tablets and Flexibility: Evaluating Planning Support System Performance under Different Conditions of Use , 2019 .

[3]  Ross Brown,et al.  The Second Life of urban planning? Using NeoGeography tools for community engagement , 2009, J. Locat. Based Serv..

[4]  Javier Martínez,et al.  Interactive Cumulative Burden Assessment: Engaging Stakeholders in an Adaptive, Participatory and Transdisciplinary Approach , 2018, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[5]  W. Zenghong,et al.  An emerging trend of GIS interaction development: Multi-touch GIS , 2012 .

[6]  Ron Janssen,et al.  Map-based multicriteria analysis to support interactive land use allocation , 2011, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[7]  Luc Van Gool,et al.  The V-City Project , 2011, VAST.

[8]  E. Falco,et al.  Digital Participatory Platforms for Co-Production in Urban Development , 2018, Crowdsourcing.

[9]  Johannes Flacke,et al.  SUSS Revisited : an interactive spatial understanding support system (ISUSS) for collaborative spatial problem structuring + powerpoint , 2014 .

[10]  Sander Lenferink,et al.  Integrating Geodesign and game experiments for negotiating urban development , 2016 .

[11]  Agile Manifesto,et al.  Manifesto for Agile Software Development , 2001 .

[12]  Stephen Glackin,et al.  Planning support systems for smart cities , 2017 .

[13]  D. Heinrichs,et al.  Fresh Wind or Hot Air—Does the Governance Discourse Have Something to Offer to Spatial Planning? , 2011 .

[14]  Diana Reckien,et al.  Geo-Information Tools, Governance, and Wicked Policy Problems , 2018, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[15]  Fred Toppen,et al.  Introduction to ‘Planning Support Systems for Sustainable Urban Development’ , 2013 .

[16]  Alan M. MacEachren,et al.  Developing a conceptual framework for visually-enabled geocollaboration , 2004, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[17]  Stan Geertman,et al.  PSS: Beyond the implementation gap , 2017 .

[18]  Ilse M. Voskamp,et al.  Planning support system for climate adaptation: Composing effective sets of blue-green measures to reduce urban vulnerability to extreme weather events , 2015 .

[19]  Stan Geertman,et al.  Using MapTable® to Learn About Sustainable Urban Development , 2013 .

[20]  Laxmi Ramasubramanian,et al.  Essential Methods for Planning Practitioners: Skills and Techniques for Data Analysis, Visualization, and Communication , 2017 .

[21]  Menno-Jan Kraak,et al.  Enabling collaborative GeoVisual analytics: Systems, techniques, and research challenges , 2018, Trans. GIS.

[22]  Stan Geertman,et al.  The added value of Planning Support Systems: A practitioner's perspective , 2014, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[23]  Saul Greenberg,et al.  Enabling interaction with single user applications through speech and gestures on a multi-user tabletop , 2006, AVI '06.

[24]  Arend Ligtenberg,et al.  SimLandScape, a sketching tool for collaborative spatial planning , 2011 .

[25]  Cheryl de Boer,et al.  An Interactive Planning Support Tool for Addressing Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy Projects in The Netherlands , 2017, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[26]  Erik Duval,et al.  Touching transport - a case study on visualizing metropolitan public transit on interactive tabletops , 2014, AVI.

[27]  N. Anokye Stakeholder Participation in Water Resources Management:: The Case of Densu Basin in Ghana , 2013 .

[28]  Jan Riemann,et al.  Collaborative Interaction with Geospatial Data - A Comparison of Paper Maps, Desktop GIS and Interactive Tabletops , 2016, Collaboration Meets Interactive Spaces.

[29]  A Viard,et al.  Augmenting Quantum-GIS for collaborative and interactive Tabletops , 2011 .

[30]  Maarit Kahila,et al.  SoftGIS as a Bridge-Builder in Collaborative Urban Planning , 2009 .

[31]  Johannes Flacke,et al.  Interactive Knowledge Co-Production and Integration for Healthy Urban Development , 2017 .

[32]  Gustavo A. Arciniegas,et al.  Planning Support Systems and Task-Technology Fit: a Comparative Case Study , 2015 .

[33]  S. Geertman,et al.  Knowledge in communicative planning practice: a different perspective for planning support systems , 2015 .

[34]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Collaborating around vertical and horizontal displays: which way is best? , 2004 .

[35]  Christopher J.A. Macleod,et al.  What Do Users Really Need? Participatory Development of Decision Support Tools for Environmental Management Based on Outcomes , 2017 .

[36]  Gustavo A. Arciniegas,et al.  Interactive Marine Spatial Planning: Siting Tidal Energy Arrays around the Mull of Kintyre , 2012, PloS one.

[37]  Mary Czerwinski,et al.  Co-Located Collaborative Visual Analytics around a Tabletop Display , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[38]  Arend Ligtenberg,et al.  Socio-technical PSS development to improve functionality and usability—Sketch planning using a Maptable , 2010 .

[39]  Songnian Li,et al.  Real-time collaborative GIS: A technological review , 2016 .

[40]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Collaborating around vertical and horizontal large interactive displays: which way is best? , 2004, Interact. Comput..

[41]  Ron Janssen,et al.  Collaborative use of geodesign tools to support decision-making on adaptation to climate change , 2015, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change.

[42]  Hans Hagen,et al.  Collaborative visualization: Definition, challenges, and research agenda , 2011, Inf. Vis..

[43]  Marco te Brömmelstroet,et al.  From Planning Support Systems to Mediated Planning Support: A Structured Dialogue to Overcome the Implementation Gap , 2010 .

[44]  Maggi Kelly,et al.  A review of the emergent ecosystem of collaborative geospatial tools for addressing environmental challenges , 2017, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[45]  de B Bauke Vries,et al.  Simlandscape: serious gaming in participatory spatial planning , 2007 .

[46]  Frans van de Ven,et al.  Adaptation Planning Support Toolbox: Measurable performance information based tools for co-creation of resilient, ecosystem-based urban plans with urban designers, decision-makers and stakeholders , 2016 .

[47]  Ron Janssen,et al.  Using geodesign to develop a spatial adaption strategy for Friesland. , 2014 .

[48]  Stan Geertman,et al.  Smart Governance, Collaborative Planning and Planning Support Systems: A Fruitful Triangle? , 2015 .

[49]  Vladan Devedzic,et al.  A comparative study of software tools for user story management , 2015, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[50]  Daniel A. Keim,et al.  Geovisual analytics for spatial decision support: Setting the research agenda , 2007, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[51]  C. Haaren,et al.  Communicating spatial planning decisions at the landscape and farm level with landscape visualization , 2014 .

[52]  Alexander Maedche,et al.  Exploring principles of user-centered agile software development: A literature review , 2015, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[53]  D. Booth,et al.  Taking responsibility for complexity How implementation can achieve results in the face of complex problems , 2011 .

[55]  Cynthia Girling,et al.  A collaborative multi-touch, multi-display, urban futures tool , 2013, ANSS 2013.

[56]  Paul Schot,et al.  Bottlenecks Blocking Widespread Usage of Planning Support Systems , 2005 .

[57]  Stan Geertman,et al.  Participatory Planning and GIS: A PSS to Bridge the Gap , 2002 .

[58]  Joanna Saad-Sulonen,et al.  Digital tools in participatory planning , 2010 .

[59]  MaedcheAlexander,et al.  Exploring principles of user-centered agile software development , 2015 .

[60]  Eduardo Dias,et al.  Beauty and Brains: Integrating Easy Spatial Design and Advanced Urban Sustainability Models , 2013 .

[61]  Rojin S. Vishkaie,et al.  Perception and reality: exploring urban planners' vision on GIS tasks for multi-touch displays , 2012, ITS.

[62]  R. Shrestha,et al.  Strengthening Participation Using Interactive Planning Support Systems: A Systematic Review , 2019, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[63]  Ron Janssen,et al.  Spatial decision support for collaborative land use planning workshops , 2012 .

[64]  Marco te Brömmelstroet,et al.  Facilitating PSS workshops : A conceptual framework and findings from interviews with facilitators , 2015 .

[65]  Maria Francesca Costabile,et al.  Towards satisfying practitioners in using Planning Support Systems , 2018, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[66]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The new science of management decision , 1960 .