A new multi-criterion decision making (MCDM) method based on proximity indexed value for minimizing rank reversals

Abstract The identification of best alternative from amongst the available choices is a complex task dependent upon the user priorities that needs to be graded on a rating scale requiring careful consideration of all influencing characteristic features of individual alternative. Several multi criterion decision making techniques are available to facilitate the decision maker arrive at a best alternative by ranking the alternatives in an order of preference. However, it has been observed that with the addition of new alternatives or deletion of existing alternatives, the ranks of the available alternatives, indicating their suitability to a particular set of requirements, is not maintained. This is often described as rank reversal phenomenon by many researchers. The commonly used MCDM methods are particularly incapable of preventing this rank reversal phenomenon. Thus, addition of new alternative/s or deletion of existing alternative/s creates a modified order of preference which may, sometimes, lead to erroneous decisions/results. In the present research work, an effort has been made to critically examine the rank reversal phenomenon with an aim to propose a new method to obviate this problem. In order to establish the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method in preventing the rank reversal phenomenon, several case studies covering different technological specializations from the reported literature work have been considered. The results indicate that the rank reversal issue was found to be minimal with the use of proposed method and a good correlation was found to exist between the rankings obtained by the proposed method and the other commonly used MCDM methods. The proposed method is thus capable of preventing the rank reversal phenomenon, arising out of change in available alternatives.

[1]  Mevlut Uyan GIS-based solar farms site selection using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in Karapinar region, Konya/Turkey , 2013 .

[2]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  On the relativity of relative measures - accommodating both rank preservation and rank reversals in the AHP , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[3]  K. Maniya,et al.  A selection of material using a novel type decision-making method: Preference selection index method , 2010 .

[4]  Subir Kumar Saha,et al.  Attribute based specification, comparison and selection of a robot , 2004 .

[5]  M. Hudson,et al.  Regional scale wind farm and solar farm suitability assessment using GIS-assisted multi-criteria evaluation , 2015 .

[6]  Yi-Hsuan Chen,et al.  A fuzzy MCDM approach for evaluating banking performance based on Balanced Scorecard , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[7]  Alireza Sotoudeh-Anvari,et al.  A comprehensive MCDM-based approach using TOPSIS, COPRAS and DEA as an auxiliary tool for material selection problems , 2017 .

[8]  R. Venkata Rao,et al.  Rapid prototyping process selection using graph theory and matrix approach , 2007 .

[9]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Decision making on business issues with foresight perspective; an application of new hybrid MCDM model in shopping mall locating , 2013, Expert Syst. Appl..

[10]  Juan Miguel Sánchez-Lozano,et al.  Geographical Information Systems (GIS) and Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods for the evaluation of solar farms locations: Case study in south-eastern Spain , 2013 .

[11]  Celik Parkan,et al.  Decision-making and performance measurement models with applications to robot selection , 1999 .

[12]  Bryan H. Massam,et al.  Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) techniques in planning , 1988 .

[13]  Alireza Afshari,et al.  Simple Additive Weighting approach to Personnel Selection problem , 2010 .

[14]  Valerie Belton,et al.  On a short-coming of Saaty's method of analytic hierarchies , 1983 .

[15]  J. Barzilai,et al.  Ahp Rank Reversal, Normalization and Aggregation Rules , 1994 .

[16]  J. Dyer Remarks on the analytic hierarchy process , 1990 .

[17]  Howard Raiffa,et al.  Games and Decisions: Introduction and Critical Survey. , 1958 .

[18]  Sandeep Grover,et al.  Application of preference selection index method for decision making over the design stage of production system life cycle , 2015 .

[19]  Huan Qi,et al.  A Extended TOPSIS Method for the Stochastic Multi-Criteria Decision Making Problem through Interval Estimation , 2010, 2010 2nd International Workshop on Intelligent Systems and Applications.

[20]  Sin-Jin Lin,et al.  Construction method selection for green building projects to improve environmental sustainability by using an MCDM approach , 2013 .

[21]  T. Saaty How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1990 .

[22]  Halil Çalışkan,et al.  Material selection for the tool holder working under hard milling conditions using different multi criteria decision making methods , 2013 .

[23]  Shankar Chakraborty,et al.  Selection of non-traditional machining processes using analytic network process , 2011 .

[24]  Shinn Sun,et al.  Assessing computer numerical control machines using data envelopment analysis , 2002 .

[25]  Morteza Yazdani,et al.  A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[26]  James Nga-Kwok Liu,et al.  Application of decision-making techniques in supplier selection: A systematic review of literature , 2013, Expert Syst. Appl..

[27]  Moutaz Khouja,et al.  The use of data envelopment analysis for technology selection , 1995 .

[28]  Reza Baradaran Kazemzadeh,et al.  PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[29]  R. K. Shah,et al.  Evaluation of Hazardous Waste Management by Using VIKOR: A Case Study of USA States , 2016 .

[30]  Jian Ma,et al.  A subjective and objective integrated approach to determine attribute weights , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[31]  E. Stanley Lee,et al.  An extension of TOPSIS for group decision making , 2007, Math. Comput. Model..

[32]  M. G. Bhatt,et al.  An alternative multiple attribute decision making methodology for solving optimal facility layout design selection problems , 2011, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[33]  Seyed Ali Jozi,et al.  Environmental Risk Assessment of Dams in Construction Phase Using a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) Method , 2015 .

[34]  E. Triantaphyllou,et al.  Ranking irregularities when evaluating alternatives by using some ELECTRE methods , 2008 .

[35]  Patrick T. Hester,et al.  An Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods , 2013 .

[36]  Ying Luo,et al.  On rank reversal in decision analysis , 2009, Math. Comput. Model..

[37]  Vipul Jain,et al.  An integrated approach for machine tool selection using fuzzy analytical hierarchy process and grey relational analysis , 2012 .

[38]  Ying-Ming Wang,et al.  An approach to avoiding rank reversal in AHP , 2006, Decis. Support Syst..

[39]  R. Rao,et al.  Weighted Euclidean distance based approach as a multiple attribute decision making method for plant or facility layout design selection , 2012 .

[40]  José María Moreno-Jiménez,et al.  Notes on Dependent Attributes in TOPSIS , 2014, ITQM.

[41]  María Teresa Lamata,et al.  On rank reversal and TOPSIS method , 2012, Math. Comput. Model..

[42]  R. Venkata Rao,et al.  A decision-making framework model for evaluating flexible manufacturing systems using digraph and matrix methods , 2006 .