Improving the Predictions of Computational Models of Convection-Enhanced Drug Delivery by Accounting for Diffusion Non-gaussianity

Convection-enhanced delivery (CED) is an innovative method of drug delivery to the human brain, that bypasses the blood-brain barrier by injecting the drug directly into the brain. CED aims to target pathological tissue for central nervous system conditions such as Parkinson's and Huntington's disease, epilepsy, brain tumors, and ischemic stroke. Computational fluid dynamics models have been constructed to predict the drug distribution in CED, allowing clinicians advance planning of the procedure. These models require patient-specific information about the microstructure of the brain tissue, which can be collected non-invasively using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) pre-infusion. Existing models employ the diffusion tensor, which represents Gaussian diffusion in brain tissue, to provide predictions for the drug concentration. However, those predictions are not always in agreement with experimental observations. In this work we present a novel computational fluid dynamics model for CED that does not use the diffusion tensor, but rather the diffusion probability that is experimentally measured through diffusion MRI, at an individual-participant level. Our model takes into account effects of the brain microstructure on the motion of drug molecules not taken into account in previous approaches, namely the restriction and hindrance that those molecules experience when moving in the brain tissue, and can improve the drug concentration predictions. The duration of the associated MRI protocol is 19 min, and therefore feasible for clinical populations. We first prove theoretically that the two models predict different drug distributions. Then, using in vivo high-resolution diffusion MRI data from a healthy participant, we derive and compare predictions using both models, in order to identify the impact of including the effects of restriction and hindrance. Including those effects results in different drug distributions, and the observed differences exhibit statistically significant correlations with measures of diffusion non-Gaussianity in brain tissue. The differences are more pronounced for infusion in white-matter areas of the brain. Using experimental results from the literature along with our simulation results, we show that the inclusion of the effects of diffusion non-Gaussianity in models of CED is necessary, if reliable predictions that can be used in the clinic are to be generated by CED models.

[1]  U. Egert,et al.  Early tissue damage and microstructural reorganization predict disease severity in experimental epilepsy , 2017, eLife.

[2]  P F Morrison,et al.  Variables affecting convection-enhanced delivery to the striatum: a systematic examination of rate of infusion, cannula size, infusate concentration, and tissue-cannula sealing time. , 1999, Journal of neurosurgery.

[3]  S. Gill,et al.  Convection-enhanced delivery of AAV2 in white matter—A novel method for gene delivery to cerebral cortex , 2013, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[4]  Guy M McKhann,et al.  A technique for minimally altering anatomically based subthalamic electrode targeting by microelectrode recording. , 2006, Neurosurgical focus.

[5]  P. Basser Inferring microstructural features and the physiological state of tissues from diffusion‐weighted images , 1995, NMR in biomedicine.

[6]  Shruti Gupta,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging‐Guided Delivery of Neural Stem Cells into the Basal Ganglia of Nonhuman Primates Reveals a Pulsatile Mode of Cell Dispersion , 2016, Stem cells translational medicine.

[7]  Ninon Burgos,et al.  New advances in the Clinica software platform for clinical neuroimaging studies , 2019 .

[8]  Derek K. Jones,et al.  Why diffusion tensor MRI does well only some of the time: Variance and covariance of white matter tissue microstructure attributes in the living human brain☆ , 2014, NeuroImage.

[9]  S. Maier,et al.  Convection-enhanced drug delivery: increased efficacy and magnetic resonance image monitoring. , 2005, Cancer research.

[10]  Y. Assaf,et al.  Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI)-based White Matter Mapping in Brain Research: A Review , 2007, Journal of Molecular Neuroscience.

[11]  E. Oldfield,et al.  Convective delivery of macromolecules into the naive and traumatized spinal cords of rats. , 1999, Journal of neurosurgery.

[12]  P. Basser,et al.  MR diffusion tensor spectroscopy and imaging. , 1994, Biophysical journal.

[13]  Salvatore Torquato,et al.  Rigorous link between fluid permeability, electrical conductivity, and relaxation times for transport in porous media , 1991 .

[14]  F. Q. Ribeiro The meta-analysis , 2017, Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology.

[15]  Jack Bresenham,et al.  Algorithm for computer control of a digital plotter , 1965, IBM Syst. J..

[16]  P. Basser,et al.  Estimation of the effective self-diffusion tensor from the NMR spin echo. , 1994, Journal of magnetic resonance. Series B.

[17]  P F Morrison,et al.  Convection-enhanced delivery of macromolecules in the brain. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  S. Hassanizadeh,et al.  Modeling Concentration Distribution and Deformation During Convection-Enhanced Drug Delivery into Brain Tissue , 2012, Transport in Porous Media.

[19]  B. Yamini,et al.  Convection-enhanced delivery for treatment of brain tumors , 2007, Expert review of anticancer therapy.

[20]  J. Mugler,et al.  Three‐dimensional magnetization‐prepared rapid gradient‐echo imaging (3D MP RAGE) , 1990, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[21]  M. Rogawski Convection-enhanced delivery in the treatment of epilepsy , 2009, Neurotherapeutics.

[22]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL , 2004, NeuroImage.

[23]  Robert C. Wolpert,et al.  A Review of the , 1985 .

[24]  R K Jain,et al.  Transport of fluid and macromolecules in tumors. I. Role of interstitial pressure and convection. , 1989, Microvascular research.

[25]  E. Stejskal Use of Spin Echoes in a Pulsed Magnetic‐Field Gradient to Study Anisotropic, Restricted Diffusion and Flow , 1965 .

[26]  Ralf Metzler,et al.  Physical pictures of transport in heterogeneous media: Advection‐dispersion, random‐walk, and fractional derivative formulations , 2002, cond-mat/0202327.

[27]  A. Dale,et al.  Conductivity tensor mapping of the human brain using diffusion tensor MRI , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  晏 小林,et al.  脳内出血で発症した転移性extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcomaの1例 , 2008 .

[29]  Derek K. Jones,et al.  Diffusion‐tensor MRI: theory, experimental design and data analysis – a technical review , 2002 .

[30]  Hrvoje Jasak,et al.  A tensorial approach to computational continuum mechanics using object-oriented techniques , 1998 .

[31]  P. Bhattacharya Diffusion MRI: Theory, methods, and applications, Derek K. Jones (Ed.). Oxford University press (2011), $152.77 , 2012 .

[32]  Jung Hwan Kim,et al.  Evaluation of a voxelized model based on DCE-MRI for tracer transport in tumor. , 2012, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[33]  J. Burgunder,et al.  Diffusion imaging studies of Huntington's disease: A meta-analysis. , 2016, Parkinsonism & related disorders.

[34]  Raghu Raghavan,et al.  Predictive models for pressure-driven fluid infusions into brain parenchyma , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[35]  N. Makris,et al.  High angular resolution diffusion imaging reveals intravoxel white matter fiber heterogeneity , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[36]  K. N. Magdoom,et al.  MRI-Based Computational Model of Heterogeneous Tracer Transport following Local Infusion into a Mouse Hind Limb Tumor , 2014, PloS one.

[37]  Johanne Hizanidis The Master Equation , 2002 .

[38]  M. Dentz,et al.  Modeling non‐Fickian transport in geological formations as a continuous time random walk , 2006 .

[39]  Carlo Pierpaoli,et al.  Mean apparent propagator (MAP) MRI: A novel diffusion imaging method for mapping tissue microstructure , 2013, NeuroImage.

[40]  Raghu Raghavan,et al.  Convection-enhanced delivery of therapeutics for brain disease, and its optimization. , 2006, Neurosurgical focus.

[41]  Jung Hwan Kim,et al.  A voxelized model of direct infusion into the corpus callosum and hippocampus of the rat brain: model development and parameter analysis , 2010, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[42]  Malisa Sarntinoranont,et al.  Voxelized model of interstitial transport in the rat spinal cord following direct infusion into white matter. , 2009, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[43]  S. Maier,et al.  Convection-Enhanced Drug Delivery of Interleukin-4 Pseudomonas Exotoxin (PRX321): Increased Distribution and Magnetic Resonance Monitoring , 2009, Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.

[44]  Michael A Vogelbaum,et al.  Convection-enhanced delivery for the treatment of glioblastoma. , 2015, Neuro-oncology.

[45]  G. Gillies,et al.  Quantification of convection-enhanced delivery to the ischemic brain , 2010, Physiological measurement.

[46]  P F Morrison,et al.  High-flow microinfusion: tissue penetration and pharmacodynamics. , 1994, The American journal of physiology.

[47]  S. Arridge,et al.  Detection and modeling of non‐Gaussian apparent diffusion coefficient profiles in human brain data , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[48]  Paul R. Carney,et al.  Voxelized Computational Model for Convection-Enhanced Delivery in the Rat Ventral Hippocampus: Comparison with In Vivo MR Experimental Studies , 2012, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[49]  Yaniv Assaf,et al.  Composite hindered and restricted model of diffusion (CHARMED) MR imaging of the human brain , 2005, NeuroImage.

[50]  Mahadevabharath R. Somayaji,et al.  Computational methods for predicting drug transport in anisotropic and heterogeneous brain tissue. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[51]  Thomas H. Mareci,et al.  Computational Model of Interstitial Transport in the Spinal Cord using Diffusion Tensor Imaging , 2006, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[52]  Carl-Fredrik Westin,et al.  Estimating Diffusion Propagator and Its Moments Using Directional Radial Basis Functions , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[53]  Seth Love,et al.  Convection‐Enhanced Drug Delivery to the Brain: Therapeutic Potential and Neuropathological Considerations , 2014, Brain pathology.

[54]  Rupak K. Banerjee,et al.  A Computational Model of Direct Interstitial Infusion of Macromolecules into the Spinal Cord , 2003, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[55]  J. Tanabe,et al.  Microstructural Changes within the Basal Ganglia Differ between Parkinson Disease Subtypes , 2016, Front. Neuroanat..

[56]  V D Calhoun,et al.  A finite element model for predicting the distribution of drugs delivered intracranially to the brain. , 1997, American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology.

[57]  P. Hagmann,et al.  Mapping complex tissue architecture with diffusion spectrum magnetic resonance imaging , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[58]  H. Urey A review of atomic abundances in chondrites and the origin of meteorites , 1964 .

[59]  H. Pfeifer Principles of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Microscopy , 1992 .

[60]  C. Beaulieu,et al.  The basis of anisotropic water diffusion in the nervous system – a technical review , 2002, NMR in biomedicine.

[61]  Mahadevabharath R. Somayaji,et al.  Prediction of convection-enhanced drug delivery to the human brain. , 2008, Journal of theoretical biology.