Bioenergy production from roadside grass: A case study of the feasibility of using roadside grass for biogas production in Denmark

Abstract This paper presents a study of the feasibility of utilising roadside vegetation for biogas production in Denmark. The potential biomass yield, methane yields, and the energy balances of using roadside grass for biogas production was investigated based on spatial analysis. The results show that the potential annual yield of biomass obtainable from roadside verges varies widely depending on the local conditions. The net energy gain (NEG) from harvest, collection, transport, storage and digestion of roadside vegetation was estimated to range from 60,126–121,476 GJ, corresponding to 1.5–3.0% of the present national energy production based on biogas. The estimated values for the energy return on invested energy (EROEI) was found to range from 2.17 to 2.88. The measured contents of heavy metals in the roadside vegetation was seen not to exceed the legislative levels for what can be applied as fertilizer on agricultural land, neither does it reach levels considered as inhibitory for the anaerobic fermentation process. From a practical point of view, few challenges were identified related to the acquisition and processing of the roadside vegetation. Considering the positive net energy gains, further energy investments for management of these challenges can be made. Despite the somewhat low EROEI values, the use of this resource could however result in other positive externalities, such as improved biodiversity of the verges and recycling of nutrients.

[1]  T. Amon,et al.  Bioenergy from permanent grassland--a review: 2. Combustion. , 2009, Bioresource technology.

[2]  A. M. Salter,et al.  Anaerobic digestion of verge cuttings for transport fuel , 2007 .

[3]  G. Zeeman,et al.  Pretreatments to enhance the digestibility of lignocellulosic biomass. , 2009, Bioresource technology.

[4]  E. Millán,et al.  Assessment of Cd, Pb and Zn contamination in roadside soils and grasses from Gipuzkoa (Spain) , 1998 .

[5]  T. Parr,et al.  Management of roadside vegetation: the long-term effects of cutting , 1988 .

[6]  A. P. Schaffers,et al.  Optimizing grassland management for flower-visiting insects in roadside verges , 2009 .

[7]  W. C. Boyle,et al.  ENERGY RECOVERY FROM SANITARY LANDFILLS - A REVIEW , 1977 .

[8]  Jerry D. Murphy,et al.  What type of digester configurations should be employed to produce biomethane from grass silage , 2010 .

[9]  Henrik Bjarne Møller,et al.  Græs er ægte grøn energi , 2008 .

[10]  Awwa,et al.  Standard Methods for the examination of water and wastewater , 1999 .

[11]  Charles A. S. Hall,et al.  What is the Minimum EROI that a Sustainable Society Must Have , 2009 .

[12]  Martin Dieterich,et al.  Biogas production potential from economically usable green waste. , 2012 .

[13]  T Amon,et al.  Bioenergy from permanent grassland--a review: 1. Biogas. , 2009, Bioresource technology.

[14]  Y. Ho,et al.  Elevated levels of lead and other metals in roadside soil and grass and their use to monitor aerial metal depositions in Hong Kong. , 1988, Environmental pollution.

[15]  A. Voinov,et al.  Assessing bioenergy potential in rural areas – A NEG-EROEI approach , 2013 .

[16]  Alexandra Kouzeli-Katsiri,et al.  Assessment of the toxicity of heavy metals to the anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge , 1988 .

[17]  T. Thamsiriroj,et al.  Difficulties Associated with Monodigestion of Grass as Exemplified by Commissioning a Pilot-Scale Digester , 2010 .

[18]  A. E. Greenberg,et al.  Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater : supplement to the sixteenth edition , 1988 .

[19]  Paul H. Smith,et al.  Conversion of biomass into methane gas. , 1984 .