Influence of type and severity of pure forms of age-related cataract on visual acuity and contrast sensitivity. Italian American Cataract Study Group.

PURPOSE To compare the relationship between logMAR visual acuity (VA) and cataract severity and between contrast sensitivity (CS) and cataract severity in pure types of age-related lens opacities. METHODS Analysis included patients followed in the ongoing Italian-American Study of the Natural History of Age-Related Cataract. Lens opacities were classified and graded according to the Lens Opacities Classification System II (LOCS II). Visual acuity was measured with the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Chart. Contrast sensitivity was measured with the Pelli-Robson chart. RESULTS Data from 1,076 eyes were used for the analysis (366 clear lenses; 550, 124, and 36 eyes with cortical, nuclear and posterior subcapsular cataract, respectively). In age-adjusted analyses, increasing severity of all three cataract types was associated with progressively higher logMAR VA, which translates into poorer acuity, and lower CS scores. For both VA and CS, the effect of increasing severity was greatest for nuclear and least for cortical opacities. After adjusting for age and VA, CS scores were no longer associated with cataract type and severity, with the exception of advanced cortical opacities. CONCLUSIONS Increased cataract severity, as determined by LOCS II grading, is strongly associated with both VA and CS scores. Contrast sensitivity scores obtained from testing at low spatial frequency do not seem to offer additional information over standard VA testing in early cortical and posterior subcapsular opacities nor in nuclear cataracts.

[1]  T. Williamson,et al.  Contrast sensitivity and glare in cataract using the Pelli-Robson chart. , 1992, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[2]  M. Stazi,et al.  Risk factors for age-related cortical, nuclear, and posterior subcapsular cataracts. The Italian-American Cataract Study Group. , 1991, American journal of epidemiology.

[3]  F. Ferris,et al.  New visual acuity charts for clinical research. , 1982, American journal of ophthalmology.

[4]  L. Chylack,et al.  Loss of contrast sensitivity in diabetic patients with LOCS II classified cataracts. , 1993, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[5]  T. A. Ryan,et al.  Minitab Student Handbook , 1979 .

[6]  L T Chylack,et al.  Lens opacities classification system II (LOCS II) , 1989, Archives of ophthalmology.

[7]  R. Hess,et al.  Vision through cataracts. , 1978, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[8]  G. Rubin.  RELIABILITY AND SENSITIVITY OF CLINICAL CONTRAST SENSITIVITY TESTS , 1988 .

[9]  M. Podgor,et al.  Contrast and glare sensitivity. Association with the type and severity of the cataract. , 1992, Ophthalmology.

[10]  D Whitaker,et al.  Contrast sensitivity and glare sensitivity changes with three types of cataract morphology: are these techniques necessary in a clinical evaluation of cataract? , 1989, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[11]  H. Taylor,et al.  The effect of early cataracts on glare and contrast sensitivity. A pilot study. , 1992, Archives of ophthalmology.

[12]  The effect of cataract severity and morphology on the reliability of the Lens Opacities Classification System II (LOCS II). , 1991, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.