Minimum Noise Fraction versus Principal Component Analysis as a Preprocessing Step for Hyperspectral Imagery Denoising

Abstract. Minimum noise fraction (MNF) is a well-known technique for hyperspectral imagery denoising. It transforms a noisy data cube into output channel images with steadily increasing noise levels, which means that the MNF output images contain steadily decreasing image quality. Principal component analysis (PCA) can also be used for hyperspectral imagery denoising. The PCA is defined in such a way that the first principal component has the largest possible variance, and each succeeding component has the highest variance possible under the constraint that it is orthogonal to the preceding components. It can be shown that these components are the Eigenvectors of the covariance matrix of the samples. In this study, we compare PCA-based methods with MNF-based methods for hyperspectral imagery denoising. Our comparison consists of the following 3 steps: (1) forward MNF/PCA transform of a noisy hyperspectral data cube; (2) reduce noise in selected output channel images with index k > k0, a channel number cutoff threshold; (3) inverse MNF/PCA transform of the noise-reduced channel images to obtain the denoised hyperspectral data cube. Our experiments demonstrate that MNF-based methods achieve higher signal-to-noise ratios than PCA-based methods for signal-dependent noise, whereas PCA-based methods produce higher SNRs than MNF-based methods for Gaussian white noise.

[1]  P. Switzer,et al.  A transformation for ordering multispectral data in terms of image quality with implications for noise removal , 1988 .

[2]  J. B. Lee,et al.  Enhancement of high spectral resolution remote-sensing data by a noise-adjusted principal components transform , 1990 .

[3]  I. Johnstone,et al.  Ideal spatial adaptation by wavelet shrinkage , 1994 .

[4]  R. E. Roger Principal Components transform with simple, automatic noise adjustment , 1996 .

[5]  Jean-Michel Morel,et al.  A non-local algorithm for image denoising , 2005, 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05).

[6]  Shen-En Qian,et al.  Noise reduction of hyperspectral imagery using hybrid spatial-spectral derivative-domain wavelet shrinkage , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[7]  Marco Diani,et al.  Analysis of the classification accuracy of a new MNF based feature extraction algorithm , 2006, SPIE Remote Sensing.

[8]  Alessandro Foi,et al.  Image Denoising by Sparse 3-D Transform-Domain Collaborative Filtering , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[9]  Karen O. Egiazarian,et al.  Video denoising by sparse 3D transform-domain collaborative filtering , 2007, 2007 15th European Signal Processing Conference.

[10]  Salah Bourennane,et al.  Noise Removal From Hyperspectral Images by Multidimensional Filtering , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[11]  Lianru Gao,et al.  An Improved MNF Transform Algorithm on Hyperspectral Images with Complex Mixing Ground Objects , 2008, 2008 Congress on Image and Signal Processing.

[12]  Guangyi Chen,et al.  Simultaneous dimensionality reduction and denoising of hyperspectral imagery using bivariate wavelet shrinking and principal component analysis , 2008 .

[13]  Guangyi Chen,et al.  Denoising and dimensionality reduction of hyperspectral imagery using wavelet packets, neighbour shrinking and principal component analysis , 2009 .

[14]  Heng Tao Shen,et al.  Principal Component Analysis , 2009, Encyclopedia of Biometrics.

[15]  Lianru Gao,et al.  A maximum noise fraction transform with improved noise estimation for hyperspectral images , 2009, Science in China Series F: Information Sciences.

[16]  M. Ioannides,et al.  Digital Heritage , 2010, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[17]  Guangyi Chen,et al.  Denoising of hyperspectral imagery by combining PCA with block-matching 3-D filtering , 2011 .

[18]  Torbjørn Skauli,et al.  Sensor noise informed representation of hyperspectral data, with benefits for image storage and processing. , 2011, Optics express.

[19]  Marco Diani,et al.  Signal-Dependent Noise Modeling and Model Parameter Estimation in Hyperspectral Images , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[20]  Allan Aasbjerg Nielsen,et al.  Kernel Maximum Autocorrelation Factor and Minimum Noise Fraction Transformations , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[21]  Guangyi Chen,et al.  Denoising of Hyperspectral Imagery Using Principal Component Analysis and Wavelet Shrinkage , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[22]  Liangpei Zhang,et al.  Hyperspectral Image Denoising Employing a Spectral–Spatial Adaptive Total Variation Model , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[23]  Karen O. Egiazarian,et al.  Video Denoising, Deblocking, and Enhancement Through Separable 4-D Nonlocal Spatiotemporal Transforms , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[24]  Qian Du,et al.  Optimized maximum noise fraction for dimensionality reduction of Chinese HJ-1A hyperspectral data , 2013, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[25]  Jianshu Luo,et al.  Analysis and Denoising of Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Image in the Curvelet Domain , 2013 .

[26]  S. Mansor,et al.  A review of applying second-generation wavelets for noise removal from remote sensing data , 2013, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[27]  Karen O. Egiazarian,et al.  Nonlocal Transform-Domain Filter for Volumetric Data Denoising and Reconstruction , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[28]  Tao Lin,et al.  Hyperspectral Image Processing by Jointly Filtering Wavelet Component Tensor , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[29]  Tao Lin,et al.  Survey of hyperspectral image denoising methods based on tensor decompositions , 2013, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[30]  Kha Gia Quach,et al.  Denoising Hyperspectral Imagery Using Principal Component Analysis and Block-Matching 4D Filtering , 2014 .

[31]  Flore R. Devriendt,et al.  Effect of hyperspectral image denoising with PCA and total variation on tree species mapping using APEX data , 2014 .

[32]  Yongqiang Zhao,et al.  Hyperspectral Image Denoising via Sparse Representation and Low-Rank Constraint , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[33]  Asgeir Bjorgan,et al.  Real-Time Noise Removal for Line-Scanning Hyperspectral Devices Using a Minimum Noise Fraction-Based Approach , 2015, Sensors.

[34]  Alp Erturk,et al.  Enhanced Unmixing-Based Hyperspectral Image Denoising Using Spatial Preprocessing , 2015, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[35]  Jun Zhou,et al.  Multitask Sparse Nonnegative Matrix Factorization for Joint Spectral–Spatial Hyperspectral Imagery Denoising , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[36]  Xiangtao Zheng,et al.  Spectral–Spatial Kernel Regularized for Hyperspectral Image Denoising , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[37]  David A. Clausi,et al.  Hyperspectral Image Denoising Using a Spatial–Spectral Monte Carlo Sampling Approach , 2015, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[38]  Antonio J. Plaza,et al.  Anomaly Detection in Hyperspectral Images Based on Low-Rank and Sparse Representation , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.