Monitoring Scoliosis Surgery With Combined Multiple Pulse Transcranial Electric Motor and Cortical Somatosensory-Evoked Potentials From the Lower and Upper Extremities

Study Design. A retrospective case review was performed. Objective. To assess the value, rapidity, and safety of combined multiple-pulse transcranial electric stimulation motor-evoked potential and somatosensory-evoked potential monitoring during scoliosis surgery. Summary of Background Data. Leg somatosensory-evoked potentials can miss motor deficits, and a 50% amplitude warning criterion can produce false alarms. Methods. For this study, 33 scoliosis surgeries in neurologically normal patients under propofol/fentanyl anesthesia omitting neuromuscular blockade were monitored with four-extremity multiple-pulse transcranial electric stimulation muscle motor-evoked potentials and cortical somatosensory-evoked potentials. Instead of amplitude criteria, parallel (same-direction) change was used to identify systemic alteration and nonparallel (one- or two-limb) deterioration to identify focal neurologic compromise. Clinical observation and intraoperative electroencephalography were used to assess adverse effects. Results. Instantaneous motor-evoked potentials and rapidly reproducible cortical somatosensory-evoked potentials provided comprehensive feedback every 0.8 to 6.7 minutes (median, 2.4 minutes) without adverse effects. Parallel (systemic) changes without alarm or deficit included motor-evoked potential fading or temporary loss and leg somatosensory-evoked potential amplitudes below 50% of initial, maximum, or median intraoperative values in 10% to 37% of the cases. Three nonparallel changes occurred: 1) abrupt bilateral leg somatosensory-evoked potential 20% to 30% reduction without motor-evoked potential change during instrumentation resolving spontaneously over 30 minutes, with transient postoperative sensory symptoms; 2) right-arm somatosensory-evoked potential and motor-evoked potential reduction during hyperabduction restored after repositioning, without deficit; 3) abrupt bilateral leg motor-evoked potential loss preceding 30% to 60% somatosensory-evoked potential reduction during derotation rapidly restored after instrumentation release, without deficit. Conclusions. In neurologically normal patients, the combined methods are safe and rapid, and could improve the sensitivity and specificity of scoliosis monitoring. Arm controls facilitate differentiation between systemic alterations and focal neurologic compromise.

[1]  M. Janusz,et al.  An Approach to Intraoperative Neurophysiologic Monitoring of Thoracoabdominal Aneurysm Surgery , 2002, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[2]  R. Lesser,et al.  Anterior spinal cord injury with preserved neurogenic ‘motor’ evoked potentials , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[3]  D B MacDonald,et al.  Individually Optimizing Posterior Tibial Somatosensory Evoked Potential P37 Scalp Derivations for Intraoperative Monitoring , 2001, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[4]  F. Sala,et al.  The Role of Intraoperative Neurophysiology in the Protection or Documentation of Surgically Induced Injury to the Spinal Cord , 2001, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[5]  L. Pelosi,et al.  Intraoperative motor evoked potentials to transcranial electrical stimulation during two anaesthetic regimens , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[6]  F. Sala,et al.  Neuroprotective Role of Neurophysiological Monitoring During Endovascular Procedures in the Spinal Cord , 2001, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Vedran Deletis,et al.  Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying motor evoked potentials in anesthetized humans. Part 2. Relationship between epidurally and muscle recorded MEPs in man , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[8]  V. Amassian,et al.  Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying motor evoked potentials in anesthetized humans. Part 1. Recovery time of corticospinal tract direct waves elicited by pairs of transcranial electrical stimuli , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[9]  C. Kalkman,et al.  Assessment of spinal cord ischemia by means of evoked potential monitoring during thoracoabdominal aortic surgery. , 2000, Seminars in vascular surgery.

[10]  J. Webb,et al.  Surface Electrode Somatosensory-Evoked Potentials in Spinal Surgery: Implications for Indications and Practice , 2000, Spine.

[11]  T. Stonecipher,et al.  Femoral artery ischemia during spinal scoliosis surgery detected by posterior tibial nerve somatosensory-evoked potential monitoring. , 2000, Spine.

[12]  M. Kawaguchi,et al.  Low Dose Propofol as a Supplement to Ketamine-Based Anesthesia During Intraoperative Monitoring of Motor-Evoked Potentials , 2000, Spine.

[13]  J. Burkus,et al.  Spinally elicited peripheral nerve responses are sensory rather than motor , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[14]  D. M. Schwartz,et al.  Prevention of positional brachial plexopathy during surgical correction of scoliosis. , 2000, Journal of spinal disorders.

[15]  Y. Péréon,et al.  [Neurogenic mixed evoked potential monitoring during scoliosis surgery: retrospective analysis of 149 cases]. , 2000, Revue de chirurgie orthopedique et reparatrice de l'appareil moteur.

[16]  J. Owen.  The application of intraoperative monitoring during surgery for spinal deformity. , 1999, Spine.

[17]  C. Kalkman,et al.  Comparison of transcranial motor evoked potentials and somatosensory evoked potentials during thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair. , 1999, Annals of surgery.

[18]  A. Crawford,et al.  Intraoperative experience with neuromotor evoked potentials. A review of 60 consecutive cases. , 1999, Spine.

[19]  J C Leong,et al.  Variability of somatosensory-evoked potentials in different stages of scoliosis surgery. , 1999, Spine.

[20]  Love Br,et al.  A femoral component inserted without cement in total hip arthroplasty. A study of the Tri-Lock component with an average ten-year duration of follow-up. , 1999 .

[21]  Y. Péréon,et al.  Somatosensory- and motor-evoked potential monitoring without a wake-up test during idiopathic scoliosis surgery: an accepted standard of care. , 1999, Spine.

[22]  M. Meglio,et al.  Intraoperative motor evoked potentials monitoring in spinal neurosurgery. , 1999, Archives italiennes de biologie.

[23]  L. Pelosi,et al.  Neurological complications of anterior spinal surgery for kyphosis with normal somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) , 1999, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[24]  R. Madigan,et al.  INTRAOPERATIVE COLLISION STUDIES DEMONSTRATE DESCENDING SPINAL CORD STIMULATED EVOKED POTENTIALS AND ASCENDING SOMATOSENSORY EVOKED POTENTIALS ARE MEDIATE THROUGH COMMON PATHWAYS , 1999 .

[25]  P. Coriat,et al.  Effects of propofol, propofol-nitrous oxide and midazolam on cortical somatosensory evoked potentials during sufentanil anaesthesia for major spinal surgery. , 1999, British journal of anaesthesia.

[26]  A comparison of myogenic motor evoked responses to electrical and magnetic transcranial stimulation during nitrous oxide/opioid anesthesia. , 1999, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[27]  C. Kalkman,et al.  Strategies to prevent neurologic deficit based on motor-evoked potentials in type I and II thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair. , 1999, Journal of vascular surgery.

[28]  B. Herbaux,et al.  Neuromonitorage et anesthésie dans la chirurgie du rachis , 1998, Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology.

[29]  D. Burke,et al.  Surgical monitoring of motor pathways. , 1998, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[30]  W Harris,et al.  "Threshold-level" multipulse transcranial electrical stimulation of motor cortex for intraoperative monitoring of spinal motor tracts: description of method and comparison to somatosensory evoked potential monitoring. , 1998, Journal of neurosurgery.

[31]  J. Schramm,et al.  Isoflurane plus nitrous oxide versus propofol for recording of motor evoked potentials after high frequency repetitive electrical stimulation. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[32]  R. D. Rose.  Removing the antidromically driven sensory component from cervically evoked motor potentials. , 1998, Medical hypotheses.

[33]  L. Lenke,et al.  Major Intraoperative Neurologic Deficits in Pediatric and Adult Spinal Deformity Patients: Incidence and Etiology at One Institution , 1998, Spine.

[34]  P. Guiheneuc,et al.  Usefulness of neurogenic motor evoked potentials for spinal cord monitoring: findings in 112 consecutive patients undergoing surgery for spinal deformity. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[35]  B. Herbaux,et al.  [Neuromonitoring and anesthesia in surgery of the spine]. , 1998, Neurophysiologie clinique = Clinical neurophysiology.

[36]  M. Kofler,et al.  The role of motor evoked potentials during surgery for intramedullary spinal cord tumors. , 1997, Neurosurgery.

[37]  Z. Gokaslan,et al.  Intraoperative monitoring of spinal cord function using motor evoked potentials via transcutaneous epidural electrode during anterior cervical spinal surgery. , 1997, Journal of spinal disorders.

[38]  C J Kalkman,et al.  The Use of Ketamine or Etomidate to Supplement Sufentanil/N2O Anesthesia Does Not Disrupt Monitoring of Myogenic Transcranial Motor Evoked Responses , 1997, Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology.

[39]  R. Winter.  Neurologic Safety in Spinal Deformity Surgery , 1997, Spine.

[40]  A. Okawa,et al.  Evaluation of Motor Function During Thoracic and Thoracolumbar Spinal Surgery Based on Motor-Evoked Potentials Using Train Spinal Stimulation , 1997, Spine.

[41]  V Deletis,et al.  Intraoperative spinal cord monitoring for intramedullary surgery: an essential adjunct. , 1997, Pediatric neurosurgery.

[42]  A. Gross,et al.  The Ankle Clonus Test for Assessment of the Integrity of the Spinal Cord during Operations for Scoliosis* , 1997, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[43]  R. Hicks,et al.  Cotrel‐Dubousset Instrumentation in Children Using Simultaneous Motor And Somatosensory Evoked Potential Monitoring , 1996, Spine.

[44]  C. Kalkman,et al.  A Comparison of the Sensitivity of Epidural and Myogenic Transcranial Motor-Evoked Responses in the Detection of Acute Spinal Cord Ischemia in the Rabbit , 1996, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[45]  K. Dowling,et al.  Ovid: Intraoperative Monitoring of Motor Evoked Potentials: a Review of 116 Cases. Full Text , 2022 .

[46]  S. Jones,et al.  Motor evoked potential monitoring during spinal surgery: responses of distal limb muscles to transcranial cortical stimulation with pulse trains. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[47]  J. Schramm,et al.  Transcranial high-frequency repetitive electrical stimulation for recording myogenic motor evoked potentials with the patient under general anesthesia. , 1996, Neurosurgery.

[48]  R. D. Rose.  Sensory component of cervically evoked motor potentials. , 1996, Medical hypotheses.

[49]  M. Schepens,et al.  Upper and lower extremity somatosensory evoked potential recording during surgery for aneurysms of the descending thoracic aorta. , 1996, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[50]  M. Sussman,et al.  Direct spinal stimulation for intraoperative monitoring during scoliosis surgery , 1995, Muscle & nerve.

[51]  M. Nuwer,et al.  Somatosensory evoked potential spinal cord monitoring reduces neurologic deficits after scoliosis surgery: results of a large multicenter survey. , 1995, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[52]  N. Blumen,et al.  Paraplegia following surgical correction of scoliosis with Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation. , 1995, Bulletin (Hospital for Joint Diseases (New York, N.Y.)).

[53]  B. Allen,et al.  Relationship Between Evoked Potentials and Clinical Status in Spinal Cord Ischemia , 1995, Spine.

[54]  L. Lenke,et al.  Evoked potential monitoring of the upper extremities during thoracic and lumbar spinal deformity surgery: a prospective study. , 1994, Journal of spinal disorders.

[55]  L. Lenke,et al.  Intracanalicular osteochondroma producing spinal cord compression in hereditary multiple exostoses. , 1994, Journal of spinal disorders.

[56]  B. Allen,et al.  Relationship Between Evoked Potentials and Clinical Status in Spinal Cord Ischemia , 1994, Spine.

[57]  Guideline Thirteen: Guidelines for Standard Electrode Position Nomenclature , 1994, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[58]  Guideline Eleven: Guidelines for Intraoperative Monitoring of Sensory Evoked Potentials , 1994, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[59]  V. Deletis.  Intraoperative monitoring of the functional integrity of the motor pathways. , 1993, Advances in neurology.

[60]  J. Owen.  Intraoperative stimulation of the spinal cord for prevention of spinal cord injury. , 1993, Advances in neurology.

[61]  J. Schramm,et al.  Total intravenous anesthesia for improvement of intraoperative monitoring of somatosensory evoked potentials during aneurysm surgery. , 1992, Neurosurgery.

[62]  R. Gaines,et al.  “Backfiring” in Spinal Cord Monitoring: High Thoracic Spinal Cord Stimulation Evokes Sciatic Response by Antidromic Sensory Pathway Conduction, Not Motor Tract Conduction , 1992, Spine.

[63]  V. Tolo,et al.  Avoiding Paraplegia During Anterior Spinal Surgery: The Role of Somatosensory Evoked Potential Monitoring with Temporary Occlusion of Segmental Spinal Arteries , 1991, Spine.

[64]  C. Kalkman,et al.  Variability of Somatosensory Cortical Evoked Potentials During Spinal Surgery Effects of Anesthetic Technique and High‐Pass Digital Filtering , 1991, Spine.

[65]  M. Nuwer,et al.  Spinal Cord Monitoring: Results of the Scoliosis Research Society and the European Spinal Deformity Society Survey , 1991, Spine.

[66]  S. Jones,et al.  Spinal cord monitoring in scoliosis surgery. Experience with 1168 cases. , 1991, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[67]  J. Shaffer,et al.  Effects of halothane, enflurane, and isoflurane in nitrous oxide on multilevel somatosensory evoked potentials. , 1989, Anesthesiology.

[68]  K. Bridwell,et al.  Sensitivity and Specificity of Somatosensory and Neurogenic‐Motor Evoked Potentials in Animals and Humans , 1988, Spine.

[69]  J. Drummond,et al.  Differential effects of isoflurane/nitrous oxide on posterior tibial somatosensory evoked responses of cortical and subcortical origin. , 1988, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[70]  E. T. Jones,et al.  Intraoperative somatosensory evoked potential monitoring in scoliosis. , 1988, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[71]  R. Mañon-Espaillat,et al.  Evoked Potential Monitoring in the Operating Room , 1987, Neurology.

[72]  B. Ben-david,et al.  Anterior Spinal Fusion Complicated by Paraplegia: A Case Report of a False-negative Somatosensory-evoked Potential , 1987, Spine.

[73]  G. Klem,et al.  Intraoperative spinal somatosensory evoked potential monitoring. , 1986, Journal of neurosurgery.

[74]  C. Marsden,et al.  A method of monitoring function in corticospinal pathways during scoliosis surgery with a note on motor conduction velocities. , 1986, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[75]  G. Klem,et al.  Postoperative neurological deficits may occur despite unchanged intraoperative somatosensory evoked potentials , 1986, Annals of neurology.

[76]  W. Bunch,et al.  Spinal cord monitoring. , 1983, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[77]  H. Morton,et al.  Stimulation of the cerebral cortex in the intact human subject , 1980, Nature.