Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsies in 500 women with microcalcifications: radiological and pathological correlations

Aim: We compared radiological assessment with pathological diagnoses in 500 consecutive vacuum-assisted breast biopsies performed for microcalcifications. Methods: Lesions were biopsied using a 11-gauge mammotome device. Before biopsy, microcalcifications were classified according to the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS). Histopathological and radiological diagnosis were compared. Results: Histopathology revealed 333 (67%) benign lesions. Benign lesions were classified as BI-RADS 3 in 19%, and as suspicious in 35%. 167 lesions (33%) were malignant. Malignant lesions were classified as suspicious or highly suggestive of malignancy in 63%. Frequency of malignancy in BI-RADS categories 4 and 5 was 35% and 100%, respectively. In BI-RADS 3 microcalcifications, the malignancy frequency was 19%. The mammographic features with the highest positive predictive value for malignancies were pleomorphic morphology (42%) and a linear or segmental distribution (51%). The microcalcification morphology was not reliably able to predict malignancy. Conclusion: In this study, BI-RADS 3 microcalcification lesions had a malignancy rate that is higher than previously reported. Vacuumassisted biopsy is useful in any indeterminate and suspicious microcalcifications and provides maximum information before any operative intervention.

[1]  W. Böcker,et al.  Interdisciplinary consensus on the use and technique of vacuum-assisted stereotactic breast biopsy. , 2003, European journal of radiology.

[2]  M. Gülsün,et al.  Evaluation of breast microcalcifications according to Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System criteria and Le Gal's classification. , 2003, European journal of radiology.

[3]  P. Langenberg,et al.  Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: inter- and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  T. Helbich,et al.  Stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: a validation study. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  R. Schulz-Wendtland,et al.  Stereotactic vacuum‐assisted breast biopsy in 2874 patients , 2004, Cancer.

[6]  Peter C Gøtzsche,et al.  Is screening for breast cancer with mammography justifiable? , 2000, The Lancet.

[7]  J. Hendriks,et al.  Microcalcifications associated with ductal carcinoma in situ: mammographic-pathologic correlation. , 1994, Seminars in diagnostic pathology.

[8]  L. Liberman,et al.  The breast imaging reporting and data system: positive predictive value of mammographic features and final assessment categories. , 1998, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  I. Ellis,et al.  Pathological-radiological correlations in benign lesions excised during a breast screening programme. , 1994, Clinical radiology.

[10]  O. Gilmore,et al.  Benign biopsies in the prevalent round of breast screening: a review of 137 cases. , 1995, Clinical radiology.

[11]  H. Dinkel,et al.  Is the appearance of microcalcifications on mammography useful in predicting histological grade of malignancy in ductal cancer in situ? , 2000, The British journal of radiology.

[12]  W. Yang,et al.  Sonographic, mammographic, and histopathologic correlation of symptomatic ductal carcinoma in situ. , 2004, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  S. Pinder,et al.  Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: correlation between mammographic and pathologic findings. , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[14]  L. Liberman,et al.  Calcifications highly suggestive of malignancy: comparison of breast biopsy methods. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[15]  J. Hendriks,et al.  Extent, distribution, and mammographic/ histological correlations of breast ductal carcinoma in situ , 1990, The Lancet.

[16]  L. Liberman,et al.  Calcification retrieval at stereotactic, 11-gauge, directional, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. , 1998, Radiology.

[17]  A. Memiş,et al.  Fat necrosis of the breast: clinical, mammographic and sonographic features. , 2001, European journal of radiology.

[18]  L. Tabár,et al.  Mammography service screening and mortality in breast cancer patients: 20-year follow-up before and after introduction of screening , 2003, The Lancet.

[19]  I. B. Borel Rinkes,et al.  Vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: a critical review. , 2003, European journal of cancer.

[20]  N. Perry Quality assurance in the diagnosis of breast disease. EUSOMA Working Party. , 2001, European journal of cancer.

[21]  I. Ellis,et al.  Mammographic features of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) present on previous mammography. , 1999, Clinical radiology.

[22]  É. Fondrinier,et al.  Breast Microcalcifications: Multivariate Analysis of Radiologicand Clinical Factors for Carcinoma , 2002, World Journal of Surgery.

[23]  S. Orel,et al.  BI-RADS categorization as a predictor of malignancy. , 1999, Radiology.

[24]  R. J. Jackman,et al.  Percutaneous removal of benign mammographic lesions: comparison of automated large-core and directional vacuum-assisted stereotactic biopsy techniques. , 1998, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.