Slice-timing effects and their correction in functional MRI

Exact timing is essential for functional MRI data analysis. Datasets are commonly measured using repeated 2D imaging methods, resulting in a temporal offset between slices. To compensate for this timing difference, slice-timing correction (i.e. temporal data interpolation) has been used as an fMRI pre-processing step for more than fifteen years. However, there has been an ongoing debate about the effectiveness and applicability of this method. This paper presents the first elaborated analysis of the impact of the slice-timing effect on simulated data for different fMRI paradigms and measurement parameters, taking into account data noise and smoothing effects. Here we show, depending on repetition time and paradigm design, slice-timing effects can significantly impair fMRI results and slice-timing correction methods can successfully compensate for these effects and therefore increase the robustness of the data analysis. In addition, our results from simulated data were supported by empirical in vivo datasets. Our findings suggest that slice-timing correction should be included in the fMRI pre-processing pipeline.

[1]  J. Steffener,et al.  Investigating Hemodynamic Response Variability at the Group Level using Basis Functions , 2009, NeuroImage.

[2]  Michael Brady,et al.  TIGER - A New Model for Spatio-temporal Realignment of FMRI Data , 2004, ECCV Workshops CVAMIA and MMBIA.

[3]  R. Turner,et al.  Echo-planar imaging: magnetic resonance imaging in a fraction of a second. , 1991, Science.

[4]  Wilkin Chau,et al.  An Empirical Comparison of SPM Preprocessing Parameters to the Analysis of fMRI Data , 2002, NeuroImage.

[5]  Jonathan E. Taylor,et al.  Detecting fMRI activation allowing for unknown latency of the hemodynamic response , 2006, NeuroImage.

[6]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  The slice-timing problem in event-related fMRI , 1999 .

[7]  Mark Jenkinson,et al.  Integrating temporal information with a non-rigid method of motion correction for functional magnetic resonance images , 2007, Image Vis. Comput..

[8]  R. Turner,et al.  Detecting Latency Differences in Event-Related BOLD Responses: Application to Words versus Nonwords and Initial versus Repeated Face Presentations , 2002, NeuroImage.

[9]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A Study of Analysis Parameters That Influence the Sensitivity of Event-Related fMRI Analyses , 2000, NeuroImage.

[10]  V. D. Calhoun,et al.  fMRI analysis with the general linear model: removal of latency-induced amplitude bias by incorporation of hemodynamic derivative terms , 2004, NeuroImage.

[11]  R. Turner,et al.  Event-Related fMRI: Characterizing Differential Responses , 1998, NeuroImage.

[12]  R. Turner,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging of the human brain: data acquisition and analysis , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.