Risk Preferences, Probability Weighting, and Strategy Tradeoffs in Wildfire Management

Wildfires present a complex applied risk management environment, but relatively little attention has been paid to behavioral and cognitive responses to risk among public agency wildfire managers. This study investigates responses to risk, including probability weighting and risk aversion, in a wildfire management context using a survey-based experiment administered to federal wildfire managers. Respondents were presented with a multiattribute lottery-choice experiment where each lottery is defined by three outcome attributes: expenditures for fire suppression, damage to private property, and exposure of firefighters to the risk of aviation-related fatalities. Respondents choose one of two strategies, each of which includes "good" (low cost/low damage) and "bad" (high cost/high damage) outcomes that occur with varying probabilities. The choice task also incorporates an information framing experiment to test whether information about fatality risk to firefighters alters managers' responses to risk. Results suggest that managers exhibit risk aversion and nonlinear probability weighting, which can result in choices that do not minimize expected expenditures, property damage, or firefighter exposure. Information framing tends to result in choices that reduce the risk of aviation fatalities, but exacerbates nonlinear probability weighting.

[1]  Lisa M. Elenz,et al.  Developing the US Wildland Fire Decision Support System , 2011 .

[2]  Matthew P. Thompson,et al.  Estimating US federal wildland fire managers’ preferences toward competing strategic suppression objectives , 2013 .

[3]  J. Yoder,et al.  Playing with Fire: Endogenous Risk in Resource Management , 2004 .

[4]  Lynn A. Maguire,et al.  Can behavioral decision theory explain risk-averse fire management decisions? , 2005 .

[5]  A. Tversky,et al.  Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty , 1992 .

[6]  A. Terracol,et al.  Risk aversion and framing effects , 2012 .

[7]  A. Shleifer,et al.  Salience Theory of Choice Under Risk , 2010 .

[8]  Melissa L. Finucane,et al.  Risk as Analysis and Risk as Feelings: Some Thoughts about Affect, Reason, Risk, and Rationality , 2004, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[9]  R. Schubert,et al.  Gender, Financial Risk, and Probability Weights , 2006 .

[10]  W. Greene,et al.  Embedding risk attitude and decision weights in non-linear logit to accommodate time variability in the value of expected travel time savings , 2011 .

[11]  Harry Timmermans,et al.  Heterogeneous Latent Class Model of Activity Rescheduling, Route Choice, and Information Acquisition Decisions Under Multiple Uncertain Events , 2009 .

[12]  J. Hey,et al.  Mixture models of choice under risk , 2011, Experiments in Economics.

[13]  Richard Gonzalez,et al.  On the Shape of the Probability Weighting Function , 1999, Cognitive Psychology.

[14]  F. Johnson,et al.  Eliciting Benefit–Risk Preferences and Probability-Weighted Utility Using Choice-Format Conjoint Analysis , 2011, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[15]  Jeffrey L. Arthur,et al.  Spatial-Endogenous Fire Risk and Efficient Fuel Management and Timber Harvest , 2008, Land Economics.

[16]  Lynn A Maguire,et al.  Managing Wildfire Events: Risk‐Based Decision Making Among a Group of Federal Fire Managers , 2011, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[17]  Crystal S. Stonesifer,et al.  Developing an aviation exposure index to inform risk-based fire management decisions , 2014 .

[18]  Robert G. Haight,et al.  Deploying Wildland Fire Suppression Resources with a Scenario-Based Standard Response Model , 2007, INFOR Inf. Syst. Oper. Res..

[19]  D. McFadden.  Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior , 1972 .

[20]  Charles A. Holt,et al.  Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects , 2002 .

[21]  P. Slovic,et al.  Risk Perception and Affect , 2006 .

[22]  Matthew P. Thompson,et al.  Risk Preferences in Strategic Wildfire Decision Making: A Choice Experiment with U.S. Wildfire Managers , 2013, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[23]  Thomas C. Brown,et al.  An Alternative Incentive Structure for Wildfire Management on National Forest Land , 2005 .

[24]  B. V. Praag,et al.  A parametric analysis of prospect theory’s functionals for the general population , 2009, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[25]  H. Stott.  Cumulative prospect theory's functional menagerie , 2006 .

[26]  David A. Hensher,et al.  A latent class model for discrete choice analysis: contrasts with mixed logit , 2003 .

[27]  S. Epstein.  Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. , 1994, The American psychologist.

[28]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Conditions for intuitive expertise: a failure to disagree. , 2009, The American psychologist.

[29]  Stephen M. Johnson,et al.  The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits , 2000 .

[30]  David J. Strauss,et al.  Minimizing the cost of wildland fire suppression: a model with uncertainty in predicted flame length and fire-line width produced , 1994 .

[31]  Managing the risks of risk management on large fires , 2013 .

[32]  D. Hensher,et al.  Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications , 2000 .

[33]  Jim McLennan,et al.  Decision Making Effectiveness in Wildfire Incident Management Teams , 2006 .

[34]  Matthew P. Thompson,et al.  Progress towards and barriers to implementation of a risk framework for US federal wildland fire policy and decision making , 2011 .

[35]  Geoffrey H. Donovan,et al.  The Effect of Newspaper Coverage and Political Pressure on Wildfire Suppression Costs , 2011 .

[36]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  Money, Kisses, and Electric Shocks: On the Affective Psychology of Risk , 2001, Psychological science.

[37]  G. Klein,et al.  A recognition-primed decision (RPD) model of rapid decision making. , 1993 .

[38]  Florian Heiss,et al.  Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation , 2016 .

[39]  D. Prelec.  The Probability Weighting Function , 1998 .

[40]  Joseph Arvai,et al.  When Less is More: How Affect Influences Preferences When Comparing Low and High‐risk Options , 2006 .

[41]  A. Tversky,et al.  The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. , 1981, Science.