Managing Surface Water-Groundwater to Restore Fall Flows in the Cosumnes River

Declining fall flows are limiting the ability of the Cosumnes River to support large fall runs of Chinook salmon. Management scenarios linking surface water and groundwater alternatives to provide sufficient fall flows are examined using groundwater flow and channel routing models. Results show that groundwater overdraft in the basin has converted the river to a predominantly losing stream, practically eliminating base flows. Management alternatives to increase net recharge ~for example, pumping reductions! were examined along with surface water augmentation options. Using a minimum depth standard for fish passage, average surface water flow deficits were computed for the migration period of Chinook salmon. Groundwater deficits were evaluated by comparing simulated current groundwater conditions with conditions under various scenarios. Increases in net recharge on the order of 200 to 300 million m 3 /year would be required to reconnect the regional aquifer with the channel and in turn reestablish perennial base flows. Options that combine surface water augmentation with groundwater management are most likely to ensure sufficient river flows in the short term and to support long-term restoration of regional groundwater levels. DOI: 10.1061/~ASCE!0733-9496~2004!130:4~301! CE Database subject headings: Surface waters; Ground water; Restoration; California; Rivers; Base flow.

[1]  Marios Sophocleous,et al.  Methodology and application of combined watershed and ground-water models in Kansas , 2000 .

[2]  N. Nobi,et al.  Simulation of Regional Flow and Salinity Intrusion in an Integrated Stream‐Aquifer System in Coastal Region: Southwest Region of Bangladesh , 1997 .

[3]  Dan Rosbjerg,et al.  Sustainability of water resources under increasing uncertainty , 1997 .

[4]  Michael L. Anderson,et al.  Modeling Low Flows on the Cosumnes River , 2004 .

[5]  T. C. Winter,et al.  Ground Water and Surface Water: A Single Resource , 1999 .

[6]  J. Nash,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆ , 1970 .

[7]  A. A. Pucci,et al.  Simulated effects of development on regional ground-water/surface-water interactions in the northern Coastal Plain of New Jersey , 1995 .

[8]  Quantifying the exchange rate between groundwater and small streams , 1998 .

[9]  Thomas C. Winter,et al.  RECENT ADVANCES IN UNDERSTANDING THE INTERACTION OF GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER , 1995 .

[10]  M. Sophocleous.  Interactions between groundwater and surface water: the state of the science , 2002 .

[11]  G. C. Lines.  Ground-water and surface-water relations along the Mojave River, southern California , 1996 .

[12]  G. M. Kondolf,et al.  Effects of bank storage and well pumping on base flow, Carmel River, Monterey County, California , 1987 .

[13]  Eric M LaBolle,et al.  Review of the Integrated Groundwater and Surface‐Water Model (IGSM) , 2003, Ground water.

[14]  K. R. Rushton,et al.  Possible mechanisms for leakage between aquifers and rivers , 1979 .

[15]  R. Glennon.  Water Follies: Groundwater Pumping and the Fate of America's Fresh Waters , 2002 .

[16]  M. Sophocleous,et al.  Development of a Comprehensive Watershed Model Applied to Study Stream Yield under Drought Conditions , 1999 .

[17]  C. V. Theis.  The effect of a well on the flow of a nearby stream , 1941 .

[18]  Rao S. Govindaraju,et al.  Development and application of a comprehensive simulation model to evaluate impacts of watershed structures and irrigation water use on streamflow and groundwater: the case of Wet Walnut Creek Watershed, Kansas, USA , 2000 .

[19]  M. Davisson,et al.  Isotopic imaging of surface water/groundwater interactions, Sacramento Valley, California , 1996 .

[20]  W. Woessner.  Stream and Fluvial Plain Ground Water Interactions: Rescaling Hydrogeologic Thought , 2000 .