Inferring Functional Properties from Fluid Dynamics Features

In a wide range of applied problems involving fluid flows, Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) provides detailed quantitative information on the flow field, at variable level of fidelity and computational cost. However, CFD alone cannot predict high-level functional properties that are not easily obtained from the equations of fluid motion. In this work, we present a data-driven framework to extract these additional information, such as medical diagnostic output, from CFD solutions. This is a challenging task because of the huge data dimensionality of CFD, and the limited training data that can be typically gathered due to the large computational cost of CFD. By pursuing a traditional Machine Learning (ML) pipeline of pre-processing, feature extraction, and model training, we demonstrate that informative features can be extracted from CFD data. Two experiments, pertaining to different application domains, support our claim that the convective properties implicit into a CFD solution can be leveraged to retrieve functional information that does not admit an analytical definition. Despite the preliminary nature of our study and the relative simplicity of both the geometrical and CFD models, for the first time we demonstrate that the combination of ML and CFD can diagnose a complex system in terms of high-level functional properties.

[1]  George Em Karniadakis,et al.  Hidden fluid mechanics: Learning velocity and pressure fields from flow visualizations , 2020, Science.

[2]  Walter F. Stewart,et al.  Doctor AI: Predicting Clinical Events via Recurrent Neural Networks , 2015, MLHC.

[3]  Karthik Duraisamy,et al.  Turbulence Modeling in the Age of Data , 2018, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics.

[4]  Hrvoje Jasak,et al.  A tensorial approach to computational continuum mechanics using object-oriented techniques , 1998 .

[5]  M. P. Brenner,et al.  Perspective on machine learning for advancing fluid mechanics , 2019, Physical Review Fluids.

[6]  P. Spalart A One-Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows , 1992 .

[7]  P. Illum Septoplasty and compensatory inferior turbinate hypertrophy: long-term results after randomized turbinoplasty , 2006, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology.

[8]  Petros Koumoutsakos,et al.  Machine Learning for Fluid Mechanics , 2019, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics.

[9]  O. Sunnergren,et al.  Long-term symptom relief after septoplasty , 2015, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology.

[10]  J. Nathan Kutz,et al.  Deep learning in fluid dynamics , 2017, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[11]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning , 2003, Technometrics.

[12]  Radford M. Neal Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning , 2007, Technometrics.

[13]  F. Menter Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications , 1994 .

[14]  Jinlong Wu,et al.  Physics-informed machine learning approach for reconstructing Reynolds stress modeling discrepancies based on DNS data , 2016, 1606.07987.

[15]  Kai Fukami,et al.  Assessment of supervised machine learning methods for fluid flows , 2020 .

[16]  J. Templeton,et al.  Reynolds averaged turbulence modelling using deep neural networks with embedded invariance , 2016, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[17]  Maziar Raissi,et al.  Deep Hidden Physics Models: Deep Learning of Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations , 2018, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[18]  Hossein Azizpour,et al.  Predictions of turbulent shear flows using deep neural networks , 2019, Physical Review Fluids.