The Anchoring Effect in Decision-Making with Visual Analytics

Anchoring effect is the tendency to focus too heavily on one piece of information when making decisions. In this paper, we present a novel, systematic study and resulting analyses that investigate the effects of anchoring effect on human decision-making using visual analytic systems. Visual analytics interfaces typically contain multiple views that present various aspects of information such as spatial, temporal, and categorical. These views are designed to present complex, heterogeneous data in accessible forms that aid decision-making. However, human decision-making is often hindered by the use of heuristics, or cognitive biases, such as anchoring effect. Anchoring effect can be triggered by the order in which information is presented or the magnitude of information presented. Through carefully designed laboratory experiments, we present evidence of anchoring effect in analysis with visual analytics interfaces when users are primed by representation of different pieces of information. We also describe detailed analyses of users’ interaction logs which reveal the impact of anchoring bias on the visual representation preferred and paths of analysis. We discuss implications for future research to possibly detect and alleviate anchoring bias.Index Terms: K.6.1 [Management of Computing and Information Systems]: Project and People Management-Life Cycle, K.7.m [The Computing Profession]: Miscellaneous-Ethics

[1]  Margaret E. Roberts,et al.  A Model of Text for Experimentation in the Social Sciences , 2016 .

[2]  P. Yu Multiple-Criteria Decision Making: "Concepts, Techniques, And Extensions" , 2012 .

[3]  E-Step Structural Topic Models for Open Ended Survey Responses , 2022 .

[4]  Andrew McCallum,et al.  Topic Models Conditioned on Arbitrary Features with Dirichlet-multinomial Regression , 2008, UAI.

[5]  D. Kahneman A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. , 2003, The American psychologist.

[6]  Malte Friese,et al.  The information-anchoring model of first offers: When moving first helps versus hurts negotiators. , 2016, The Journal of applied psychology.

[7]  Ling Cen,et al.  The Role of Anchoring Bias in the Equity Market: Evidence from Analysts’ Earnings Forecasts and Stock Returns , 2010, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[8]  Nicklaus A. Giacobe,et al.  Geovisual analytics for cyber security: Adopting the GeoViz Toolkit , 2011, 2011 IEEE Conference on Visual Analytics Science and Technology (VAST).

[9]  Jean-Loup Guillaume,et al.  Fast unfolding of communities in large networks , 2008, 0803.0476.

[10]  Joey F. George,et al.  Countering the anchoring and adjustment bias with decision support systems , 2000, Decis. Support Syst..

[11]  Steven Franconeri,et al.  Influencing visual judgment through affective priming , 2013, CHI.

[12]  Daniel A. Keim,et al.  Visual Analytics: Definition, Process, and Challenges , 2008, Information Visualization.

[13]  A. Furnham,et al.  A literature review of the anchoring effect , 2011 .

[14]  John D. Lafferty,et al.  A correlated topic model of Science , 2007, 0708.3601.

[15]  William Ribarsky,et al.  CrystalBall: A Visual Analytic System for Future Event Discovery and Analysis from Social Media Data , 2017, 2017 IEEE Conference on Visual Analytics Science and Technology (VAST).

[16]  Mark W. Bennett Confronting Cognitive 'Anchoring Effect' and 'Blind Spot' Biases in Federal Sentencing: A Modest Solution for Reforming a Fundamental Flaw , 2014 .

[17]  Rajeev Motwani,et al.  The PageRank Citation Ranking : Bringing Order to the Web , 1999, WWW 1999.

[18]  D. Kahneman Thinking, Fast and Slow , 2011 .

[19]  Alan M. MacEachren Visual Analytics and Uncertainty: Its Not About the Data , 2015, EuroVA@EuroVis.

[20]  Danilo Medeiros Eler,et al.  Coordinated and Multiple Views for Visualizing Text Collections , 2008, 2008 12th International Conference Information Visualisation.

[21]  Hans Hagen,et al.  Visualization of Particle Interactions in Granular Media , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[22]  William Ribarsky,et al.  VAiRoma: A Visual Analytics System for Making Sense of Places, Times, and Events in Roman History , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[23]  Thomas Hofmann,et al.  Probabilistic latent semantic indexing , 1999, SIGIR '99.

[24]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Homo Heuristicus: Why Biased Minds Make Better Inferences , 2009, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[25]  Daniel A. Keim,et al.  The Role of Uncertainty, Awareness, and Trust in Visual Analytics , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[26]  Abhinandan Das,et al.  Google news personalization: scalable online collaborative filtering , 2007, WWW '07.

[27]  William Ribarsky,et al.  Interactive Coordinated Multiple-View Visualization of Biomechanical Motion Data , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[28]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[29]  Justin Grimmer,et al.  Discovery of Treatments from Text Corpora , 2016, ACL.

[30]  Bamshad Mobasher,et al.  A Unified Approach to Personalization Based on Probabilistic Latent Semantic Models of Web Usage and Content , 2004 .

[31]  Maia B. Cook,et al.  Human Factors of the Confirmation Bias in Intelligence Analysis: Decision Support From Graphical Evidence Landscapes , 2008, Hum. Factors.

[32]  Naonori Ueda,et al.  Topic Tracking Model for Analyzing Consumer Purchase Behavior , 2009, IJCAI.

[33]  Katrien Verbert,et al.  A Framework for Cognitive Bias Detection and Feedback in a Visual Analytics Environment , 2016, 2016 European Intelligence and Security Informatics Conference (EISIC).

[34]  James M. Tien,et al.  Big Data: Unleashing information , 2013, 2013 10th International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management.

[35]  Mathieu Bastian,et al.  Gephi: An Open Source Software for Exploring and Manipulating Networks , 2009, ICWSM.

[36]  Chris North,et al.  Exploring context switching and cognition in dual-view coordinated visualizations , 2003, Proceedings International Conference on Coordinated and Multiple Views in Exploratory Visualization - CMV 2003 -.

[37]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Latent Dirichlet Allocation , 2001, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[38]  Margaret E. Roberts,et al.  stm: An R Package for Structural Topic Models , 2019, Journal of Statistical Software.

[39]  Colin Ware,et al.  Zooming versus multiple window interfaces: Cognitive costs of visual comparisons , 2006, TCHI.

[40]  Pierre Dragicevic,et al.  The Attraction Effect in Information Visualization , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[41]  Rüdiger F. Pohl Cognitive Illusions : Intriguing Phenomena in Judgement, Thinking and Memory , 2016 .

[42]  J.C. Roberts,et al.  State of the Art: Coordinated & Multiple Views in Exploratory Visualization , 2007, Fifth International Conference on Coordinated and Multiple Views in Exploratory Visualization (CMV 2007).

[43]  Eric P. Xing,et al.  Sparse Additive Generative Models of Text , 2011, ICML.

[44]  J S Blumenthal-Barby,et al.  Cognitive Biases and Heuristics in Medical Decision Making , 2015, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[45]  H. Eysenck THINKING , 1958 .