Impact of a Century of Climate Change on Small-Mammal Communities in Yosemite National Park, USA

We provide a century-scale view of small-mammal responses to global warming, without confounding effects of land-use change, by repeating Grinnell's early–20th century survey across a 3000-meter-elevation gradient that spans Yosemite National Park, California, USA. Using occupancy modeling to control for variation in detectability, we show substantial (∼500 meters on average) upward changes in elevational limits for half of 28 species monitored, consistent with the observed ∼3°C increase in minimum temperatures. Formerly low-elevation species expanded their ranges and high-elevation species contracted theirs, leading to changed community composition at mid- and high elevations. Elevational replacement among congeners changed because species' responses were idiosyncratic. Though some high-elevation species are threatened, protection of elevation gradients allows other species to respond via migration.

[1]  P. Marquet,et al.  A Significant Upward Shift in Plant Species Optimum Elevation During the 20th Century , 2008, Science.

[2]  C. Rosenzweig,et al.  Attributing physical and biological impacts to anthropogenic climate change , 2008, Nature.

[3]  S. Jackson,et al.  Novel climates, no‐analog communities, and ecological surprises , 2007 .

[4]  Robert J. Wilson,et al.  An elevational shift in butterfly species richness and composition accompanying recent climate change , 2007 .

[5]  R. J. Rowe Legacies of Land Use and Recent Climatic Change: The Small Mammal Fauna in the Mountains of Utah , 2007, The American Naturalist.

[6]  A. Dobson,et al.  Projected Impacts of Climate and Land-Use Change on the Global Diversity of Birds , 2007, PLoS biology.

[7]  C. Parmesan Ecological and Evolutionary Responses to Recent Climate Change , 2006 .

[8]  D. Grayson The Late Quaternary biogeographic histories of some Great Basin mammals (western USA) , 2006 .

[9]  T. Dawson,et al.  Model‐based uncertainty in species range prediction , 2006 .

[10]  D. Roy,et al.  The distributions of a wide range of taxonomic groups are expanding polewards , 2006 .

[11]  Rebecca J. Rowe,et al.  Elevational gradient analyses and the use of historical museum specimens: a cautionary tale , 2005 .

[12]  A. Taylor,et al.  Drought triggered tree mortality in mixed conifer forests in Yosemite National Park, California, USA , 2005 .

[13]  S. Williams,et al.  Climate warming and the rainforest birds of the Australian Wet Tropics : Using abundance data as a sensitive predictor of change in total population size , 2005 .

[14]  J. King,et al.  Response of Subalpine Conifers in the Sierra Nevada, California, U.S.A., to 20th-Century Warming and Decadal Climate Variability , 2004 .

[15]  O. Phillips,et al.  Extinction risk from climate change , 2004, Nature.

[16]  O. Schmitz,et al.  Global climate change and mammalian species diversity in U.S. national parks , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  Erik A. Beever,et al.  PATTERNS OF APPARENT EXTIRPATION AMONG ISOLATED POPULATIONS OF PIKAS (OCHOTONA PRINCEPS) IN THE GREAT BASIN , 2003 .

[18]  G. Yohe,et al.  A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems , 2003, Nature.

[19]  J. K. Hill,et al.  Responses of butterflies to twentieth century climate warming: implications for future ranges , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[20]  O. Hoegh‐Guldberg,et al.  Ecological responses to recent climate change , 2002, Nature.

[21]  J. Lawton,et al.  Making mistakes when predicting shifts in species range in response to global warming , 1998, Nature.

[22]  J. Grinnell,et al.  Animal life in the Yosemite , 1924 .

[23]  J. Grinnell Field Tests of Theories Concerning Distributional Control , 1917, The American Naturalist.