Mechanical properties of porous ceramic scaffolds: Influence of internal dimensions

Highly porous ceramic scaffolds have been fabricated from a 70% SiO2–30% CaO glass powder using stereolithography and the lost-mould process combined with gel-casting. After sintering at 1200 1C the glass crystallised to a structure of wollastonite and pseudowollastonite grains in a glassy matrix with a bulk porosity of 1.3%. All scaffolds had a simple cubic strut structure with an internal porosity of approximately 42% and internal pore dimensions in the range 300–600 μm. The mean crushing strength of the scaffolds is in the range 10–25 MPa with the largest pore sizes showing the weakest strengths. The variability of scaffold strengths has been characterised using Weibull statistics and each set of scaffolds showed a Weibull modulus of mE3 independent of pore size. The equivalent strength of the struts within the porous ceramics was estimated to be in the range 40–80 MPa using the models of the Gibson and Ashby. These strengths were found to scale with specimen size consistent with the Weibull modulus obtained from compression tests. Using a Weibull analysis, these strengths are shown to be in accordance with the strength of 3-point bend specimens of the bulk glass material fabricated using identical methods. The strength and Weibull modulus of these scaffolds are comparable to those reported for other porous ceramic scaffold materials of similar porosity made by different fabrication routes. & 2015 Published by Elsevier Ltd and Techna Group S.r.l.

[1]  Miqin Zhang,et al.  Preparation of porous hydroxyapatite scaffolds by combination of the gel-casting and polymer sponge methods. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[2]  S. D. Nunn,et al.  Development of Low‐Toxicity Gelcasting Systems , 2005 .

[3]  D. Hutmacher,et al.  Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage. , 2000, Biomaterials.

[4]  S. Hollister Porous scaffold design for tissue engineering , 2005, Nature materials.

[5]  B Derby,et al.  Gel-cast glass-ceramic tissue scaffolds of controlled architecture produced via stereolithography of moulds , 2012, Biofabrication.

[6]  J A Planell,et al.  Fabrication of low temperature macroporous hydroxyapatite scaffolds by foaming and hydrolysis of an alpha-TCP paste. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[7]  Cleo Choong,et al.  Three-dimensional scaffolds for tissue engineering applications: role of porosity and pore size. , 2013, Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews.

[8]  K. Leong,et al.  Solid freeform fabrication of three-dimensional scaffolds for engineering replacement tissues and organs. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[9]  Brian Derby,et al.  Printing and Prototyping of Tissues and Scaffolds , 2012, Science.

[10]  Chaozong Liu,et al.  Design and Development of Three-Dimensional Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering , 2007 .

[11]  P. Törmälä,et al.  Manufacturing, mechanical characterization, and in vitro performance of bioactive glass 13-93 fibers. , 2006, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[12]  S. E. Feinberg,et al.  Hydroxyapatite implants with designed internal architecture , 2001, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[13]  Aldo R Boccaccini,et al.  45S5 Bioglass-derived glass-ceramic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[14]  Julian R Jones,et al.  Factors affecting the structure and properties of bioactive foam scaffolds for tissue engineering. , 2004, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[15]  Larry L. Hench,et al.  Bioglass ®45S5 Stimulates Osteoblast Turnover and Enhances Bone Formation In Vitro: Implications and Applications for Bone Tissue Engineering , 2000, Calcified Tissue International.

[16]  D. Kaplan,et al.  Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[17]  L. Gibson The mechanical behaviour of cancellous bone. , 1985, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  Aldo R. Boccaccini,et al.  Bioactive Glass and Glass-Ceramic Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering , 2010, Materials.

[19]  M. Wolcott Cellular solids: Structure and properties , 1990 .

[20]  Julian R Jones,et al.  Optimising bioactive glass scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[21]  Eduardo Saiz,et al.  Bioinspired Strong and Highly Porous Glass Scaffolds , 2011, Advanced functional materials.

[22]  M. Callegari,et al.  Instrumental Robots Design with Applications to Manufacturing 7.1 Introduction the Design Cycle for Instrumental Robots 7.2 the Design of Function-oriented Robots Conceptual Design of Task-driven Robot-arms @bullet Conceptual Design of Work-constrained Robot-arms @bullet Computer Aids Based on Funct , 2001 .

[23]  W. Bonfield,et al.  A comparative study on the in vivo behavior of hydroxyapatite and silicon substituted hydroxyapatite granules , 2002, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[24]  X. P. Wang,et al.  Electrospun submicron bioactive glass fibers for bone tissue scaffold , 2009, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[25]  Julian R. Jones,et al.  Extracellular matrix formation and mineralization on a phosphate-free porous bioactive glass scaffold using primary human osteoblast (HOB) cells. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[26]  R. A. Strehlow,et al.  Gelcasting : a new ceramic forming process , 1991 .

[27]  D. J. Green,et al.  Compressive behavior and deformation-mode map of an open cell alumina , 1990 .

[28]  M. Ashby,et al.  Cellular solids: Structure & properties , 1988 .

[29]  Francesco Baino,et al.  Mechanical properties and reliability of glass–ceramic foam scaffolds for bone repair , 2014 .

[30]  Ta-Jen Huang,et al.  Effect of pore size on ECM secretion and cell growth in gelatin scaffold for articular cartilage tissue engineering. , 2009, Acta biomaterialia.

[31]  A. W. Wagoner Johnson,et al.  The influence of micropore size on the mechanical properties of bulk hydroxyapatite and hydroxyapatite scaffolds. , 2009, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[32]  D R Carter,et al.  Mechanical properties and composition of cortical bone. , 1978, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[33]  M. Bäker,et al.  Mechanical behaviour of ceramics , 2007 .

[34]  S F Hulbert,et al.  Potential of ceramic materials as permanently implantable skeletal prostheses. , 1970, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[35]  Larry L Hench,et al.  Third-Generation Biomedical Materials , 2002, Science.