Looking at the Road When Driving Around Bends: Influence of Vehicle Automation and Speed

When negotiating bends car drivers perform gaze polling: their gaze shifts between guiding fixations (GFs; gaze directed 1–2 s ahead) and look-ahead fixations (LAFs; longer time headway). How might this behavior change in autonomous vehicles where the need for constant active visual guidance is removed? In this driving simulator study, we analyzed this gaze behavior both when the driver was in charge of steering or when steering was delegated to automation, separately for bend approach (straight line) and the entry of the bend (turn), and at various speeds. The analysis of gaze distributions relative to bend sections and driving conditions indicate that visual anticipation (through LAFs) is most prominent before entering the bend. Passive driving increased the proportion of LAFs with a concomitant decrease of GFs, and increased the gaze polling frequency. Gaze polling frequency also increased at higher speeds, in particular during the bend approach when steering was not performed. LAFs encompassed a wide range of eccentricities. To account for this heterogeneity two sub-categories serving distinct information requirements are proposed: mid-eccentricity LAFs could be more useful for anticipatory planning of steering actions, and far-eccentricity LAFs for monitoring potential hazards. The results support the idea that gaze and steering coordination may be strongly impacted in autonomous vehicles.

[1]  Otto Lappi,et al.  Humans Use Predictive Gaze Strategies to Target Waypoints for Steering , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[2]  D. Ballard,et al.  Memory Representations in Natural Tasks , 1995, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[3]  M F Land,et al.  The knowledge base of the oculomotor system. , 1997, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[4]  Rob Gray,et al.  A Two-Point Visual Control Model of Steering , 2004, Perception.

[5]  J.,et al.  Optic Flow , 2014, Computer Vision, A Reference Guide.

[6]  Jordan Navarro,et al.  Obstacle avoidance under automated steering: Impact on driving and gaze behaviours , 2016 .

[7]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[8]  David N. Lee,et al.  Where we look when we steer , 1994, Nature.

[9]  M. Semmel Systematic Observation , 1978 .

[10]  R. M. Wilkie,et al.  Using vision to control locomotion: looking where you want to go , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[11]  Heikki Summala,et al.  Look-ahead fixations in curve driving , 2013, Ergonomics.

[12]  M. Land,et al.  The Roles of Vision and Eye Movements in the Control of Activities of Daily Living , 1998, Perception.

[13]  Heikki Summala,et al.  Effect of driving experience on anticipatory look-ahead fixations in real curve driving. , 2014, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[14]  John P. Wann,et al.  Why you should look where you are going , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[15]  Jordan Navarro,et al.  Where We Look When We Drive with or without Active Steering Wheel Control , 2012, PloS one.

[16]  Klaus Bengler,et al.  How the Duration of Automated Driving Influences Take-Over Performance and Gaze Behavior , 2017 .

[17]  Charles A. Green,et al.  The “Out-of-the-Loop” concept in automated driving: proposed definition, measures and implications , 2018, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[18]  J. Wann,et al.  Active gaze, visual look-ahead, and locomotor control. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  Otto Lappi,et al.  Future path and tangent point models in the visual control of locomotion in curve driving. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[20]  Teemu H Itkonen,et al.  Beyond the tangent point: gaze targets in naturalistic driving. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[21]  M. Hayhoe,et al.  Look-ahead fixations: anticipatory eye movements in natural tasks , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[22]  Gustav Markkula,et al.  Getting Back Into the Loop: The Perceptual-Motor Determinants of Successful Transitions out of Automated Driving , 2019, Hum. Factors.

[23]  Heikki Summala,et al.  Maintaining Lane Position with Peripheral Vision during In-Vehicle Tasks , 1996, Hum. Factors.

[24]  Otto Lappi,et al.  Visuomotor Control, Eye Movements, and Steering: A Unified Approach for Incorporating Feedback, Feedforward, and Internal Models , 2018, Psychological bulletin.

[25]  K. Bengler,et al.  Vigilance Decrement and Passive Fatigue Caused by Monotony in Automated Driving , 2015 .

[26]  David H. Weir,et al.  New Results in Driver Steering Control Models , 1977 .

[27]  Otto Lappi,et al.  Eye movements in the wild: Oculomotor control, gaze behavior & frames of reference , 2016, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[28]  Heikki Summala,et al.  Gaze doesn't always lead steering. , 2018, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[29]  Markus Lappe,et al.  Car drivers attend to different gaze targets when negotiating closed vs. open bends. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[30]  Otto Lappi,et al.  Systematic Observation of an Expert Driver's Gaze Strategy—An On-Road Case Study , 2017, Front. Psychol..

[31]  Julie M. Harris,et al.  Eye movements and hazard perception in active and passive driving , 2015, Visual cognition.

[32]  Jac Billington,et al.  Optic flow speed modulates guidance level control: New insights into two-level steering. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[33]  S. Holm A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure , 1979 .

[34]  Mary M Hayhoe,et al.  Visual memory and motor planning in a natural task. , 2003, Journal of vision.

[35]  Teemu H Itkonen,et al.  Pursuit Eye-Movements in Curve Driving Differentiate between Future Path and Tangent Point Models , 2013, PloS one.

[36]  J. Pelz,et al.  Oculomotor behavior and perceptual strategies in complex tasks , 2001, Vision Research.

[37]  Lee Kennett,et al.  For the Duration , 1985 .

[38]  Otto Lappi,et al.  A new and general approach to signal denoising and eye movement classification based on segmented linear regression , 2017, Scientific Reports.