Dark Room Provocative Test and Extent of Angle Closure: An Anterior Segment OCT Study

PurposeTo clarify the risk parameters measured by anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) for elevated intraocular pressures (IOP) provoked by the darkroom test and to provide recommendations for its clinical usage. MethodsSubjects aged >40 years and whose peripheral anterior chambers were ≤1/4 corneal thickness were recruited. The anterior segment of the eye was imaged in sitting position and under both light and dark conditions and biometry was performed using anterior segment optical coherence tomography. The analyzed parameters were: (1) central anterior chamber depth (ACD); (2) anterior chamber width; (3) pupil diameter; (4) iris curvature; (5) lens thickness; and (6) number of meridians with closed angles (NCA). Then the darkroom test was performed and a positive provocative test result was defined as a rise in IOP ≥8 mm Hg after the test. Statistical analyses included: (1) the difference in parameters between positive and negative eyes; (2) the association between posttest IOP and the parameters; and (3) the difference in parameters between the 2 eyes in subjects with the asymmetric results. ResultsA total of 70 subjects were recruited. ACD (P=0.022), NCA in light (P<0.001), and NCA in dark (P<0.001) were different significantly between eyes with positive and negative results. There was a strong association between NCA in dark (r=0.755, P<0.001) and the posttest IOP. Among subjects with asymmetric results between the 2 eyes, the ACD was shallower and the lens thickness was larger in the positive eye. ConclusionsThe posttest IOP is determined by the extent of functionally closed angles in the dark. The test may be useful in the early diagnosis of primary angle closure. At the same time, angle configuration should be evaluated to remove false positive result.

[1]  Mingguang He,et al.  Prevalence and clinical characteristics of glaucoma in adult Chinese: a population-based study in Liwan District, Guangzhou. , 2006, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[2]  Joseph A Izatt,et al.  Comparison of optical coherence tomography and ultrasound biomicroscopy for detection of narrow anterior chamber angles. , 2005, Archives of ophthalmology.

[3]  Ravi Thomas,et al.  Glaucoma management in developing countries: medical, laser, and surgical options for glaucoma management in countries with limited resources , 2004, Current opinion in ophthalmology.

[4]  D. Friedman,et al.  Interventions for angle-closure glaucoma: an evidence-based update. , 2003, Ophthalmology.

[5]  N. Congdon,et al.  Angle-closure glaucoma: impact, etiology, diagnosis, and treatment , 2003, Current opinion in ophthalmology.

[6]  Zhigang Fan,et al.  Primary angle closure glaucoma in Chinese and Western populations. , 2002, Chinese medical journal.

[7]  P. Foster,et al.  The definition and classification of glaucoma in prevalence surveys , 2002, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[8]  H A Quigley,et al.  Glaucoma in China (and worldwide): changes in established thinking will decrease preventable blindness , 2001, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[9]  M. B. Shields,et al.  Angle-Closure Glaucoma in an Urban Population in Southern India , 2001 .

[10]  R K John,et al.  Angle-closure glaucoma in an urban population in southern India. The Andhra Pradesh eye disease study. , 2000, Ophthalmology.

[11]  D. Machin,et al.  The prevalence of glaucoma in Chinese residents of Singapore: a cross-sectional population survey of the Tanjong Pagar district. , 2000, Archives of ophthalmology.

[12]  D Curran-Everett,et al.  Multiple comparisons: philosophies and illustrations. , 2000, American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology.

[13]  J S Tiedeman,et al.  Ultrasound biomicroscopic quantitative analysis of light-dark changes associated with pupillary block. , 1999, American journal of ophthalmology.

[14]  N. Wang,et al.  [Ultrasound biomicroscopic dark room provocative test]. , 1998, [Zhonghua yan ke za zhi] Chinese journal of ophthalmology.

[15]  P. Foster,et al.  Glaucoma in Mongolia. A population-based survey in Hövsgöl province, northern Mongolia. , 1996, Archives of ophthalmology.

[16]  R. Ritch,et al.  Follow-up of angle-closure glaucoma suspects. , 1993, American journal of ophthalmology.

[17]  M. Wand Provocative tests in angle-closure glaucoma: a brief review with commentary. , 1974, Ophthalmic surgery.

[18]  D. Poinoosawmy,et al.  Changes in intraocular pressure during and after the dark-room test. , 1973, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[19]  M. Galin,et al.  Prone provocative testing for narrow angle glaucoma. , 1972, Archives of ophthalmology.

[20]  A. Schwartz,et al.  Estimation of width of angle of anterior chamber. Incidence and significance of the narrow angle. , 1969, American journal of ophthalmology.

[21]  R. Lowe PRIMARY ANGLE-CLOSURE GLAUCOMA*t A REVIEW OF PROVOCATIVE TESTS , 2022 .

[22]  G. Gorin PROVOCATIVE TESTS IN ANGLE-CLOSURE GLAUCOMA; IMPORTANCE OF GONIOSCOPIC CONTROL. , 1965, American journal of ophthalmology.

[23]  A. Higgitt The Dark-Room Test * , 1954, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[24]  THE DARKROOM TEST , 2022 .