Does sacking the coach help or hinder the team in the short term? Evidence from Belgian soccer

The coaching carousel or turnover is an extreme but frequently occurring phenomenon in soccer. This study examines the effectiveness and efficiency of firing the coach in terms of team performance. In general, the purpose of coach turnover is to improve results in the short run. Therefore, the period of four games before and four games after the date of resignation is the focus of this paper. The hypotheses are set up within the concepts of the organizational learning theory. We analysed the effect of dismissing coaches by examining data from 8392 Belgian soccer games in the first, second and third national divisions; we found that many of the teams whose performance had declined over approximately two months had dismissed their coaches. Within four games under the management of a new coach, team performance improved. However, further analyses revealed that this increase was due to regression to the mean and cannot be attributed to the new coach. A control group comprising teams that had an equal performance dip but did not dismiss their coach showed a similar improvement. We conclude that coach turnover in Belgian soccer is neither an effective nor efficient means to improve performance in the short term.

[1]  Ruud H. Koning,et al.  An econometric evaluation of the effect of firing a coach on team performance , 2003 .

[2]  Robert C. Giambatista,et al.  Nothing Succeeds Like Succession: A Critical Review of Leader Succession Literature Since 1994 , 2005 .

[3]  Michael Patrick Allen,et al.  Managerial Succession and Organizational Performance: A Recalcitrant Problem Revisited. , 1979 .

[4]  SC Heerenveen,et al.  Manager to go ? Performance dips reconsidered with evidence from Dutch football , 2001 .

[5]  Terrence C. Sebora,et al.  Executive Succession: Past, Present & Future , 1994 .

[6]  Sören Salomo,et al.  The relationship of performance and managerial succession in the German premier football league , 2000 .

[7]  D. Eitzen,et al.  Managerial Change, Longevity, and Organizational Effectiveness. , 1972 .

[8]  Managerial Succession and Team Effectiveness: A Case Study of Japanese Professional Baseball , 1986 .

[9]  Greg Atkinson,et al.  The dangers of reporting spurious regression to the mean , 2004, Journal of sports sciences.

[10]  W. McTeer,et al.  Manager/coach mid-season replacement and team performance in professional team sport. , 1995 .

[11]  M. C. Brown,et al.  Administrative Succession and Organizational Performance: The Succession Effect. , 1982 .

[12]  Stephen Dobson,et al.  The impact of managerial change on team performance in professional sports , 2002 .

[13]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  Administrative Succession and Organizational Performance: How Administrator Experience Mediates the Succession Effect , 1986 .

[14]  Stephen Dobson,et al.  Organizational performance and managerial turnover , 1999 .

[15]  Roderick E. White,et al.  An Organizational Learning Framework : From Intuition to Institution Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[16]  Stephen Dobson,et al.  Team performance and managerial change in the English Football League , 1997 .

[17]  David Fabianic Managerial change and organizational effectiveness in major league baseball: findings for the eighties. , 1994 .

[18]  Albert A. Cannella,et al.  Leader capabilities, succession, and competitive context: A study of professional baseball teams , 1995 .

[19]  Albert A. Cannella,et al.  Leader succession and organizational performance: Integrating the common-sense, ritual scapegoating, and vicious-circle succession theories , 2005 .

[20]  O. Grusky,et al.  Managerial Succession and Organizational Effectiveness , 1963, American Journal of Sociology.

[21]  N. Theberge,et al.  Replacement Processes in Sport Organizations: the Case of Professional Baseball , 1976 .

[22]  William A. Gamson,et al.  Scapegoating in Baseball , 1964, American Journal of Sociology.