An analytical framework for capacity development in EIA — The case of Yemen

Abstract Most countries worldwide nowadays apply Environmental Assessment (EA) as an ex ante tool to evaluate environmental impacts of policies, plans, programmes, and projects. However, the application and performance of EA differ significantly. Scientific analysis of how EA performs mainly focuses on two levels: the micro (or project) level and the macro (or system) level. Macro level analysis usually focuses on institutions for EA and the organisation of stakeholder interaction in EA. This article proposes a more comprehensive framework for analysing EA systems that combines other approaches with a capacity approach and an explicit consideration of the context in which EA systems are developed and performed. In order to illustrate the value of our framework, we apply it to the Republic of Yemen, where over the last decades many EA capacity development programmes have been executed; however, EA performance has not substantially improved. The Yemen case study illustrates that the capacity development approach allows an understanding of the historical process, the stakeholders, the knowledge component, and the material and technical aspects of EA, but perhaps more important is a systemic understanding of the outcomes: problems are not isolated, but influence and even maintain each other. In addition, by taking into account the context characteristics, our framework allows for the assessment of the feasibility of capacity development programmes that aim at improving EA system performance.

[1]  Denis Kirchhoff,et al.  CAPACITY BUILDING FOR EIA IN BRAZIL: PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATIONS AND PROBLEMS TO BE OVERCOME , 2006 .

[2]  J. Rowan,et al.  A Critical Review of Environmental Impact Statements in Sri Lanka with Particular Reference to Ecological Impact Assessment , 2008, Environmental management.

[3]  H. Bower NZARA Putting the capacity into capacity building in South Sudan , 2000, The Lancet.

[4]  Christopher Potter,et al.  Systemic capacity building: a hierarchy of needs. , 2004, Health policy and planning.

[5]  Kate Macintyre,et al.  Mapping capacity in the health sector: a conceptual framework. , 2002, The International journal of health planning and management.

[6]  Ioannis Karakassis,et al.  Evaluation of the EIA system performance in Greece, using quality indicators , 2006 .

[7]  Francois Retief,et al.  A QUALITY AND EFFECTIVENESS REVIEW PROTOCOL FOR STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (SEA) IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES , 2007 .

[8]  RETRACTED ARTICLE: Comparative study on the environmental impact assessment of golf course development between Korea and China , 2006, Landscape and Ecological Engineering.

[9]  Angus Morrison-Saunders,et al.  Assessing Impact, Handbook of EIA and SEA Follow-up , 2004 .

[10]  Roger Maconick,et al.  Capacity-building supported by the United Nations : some evaluations and some lessons , 1999 .

[11]  Ralf Buckley Strategic environmental assessment of policies and plans: legislation and implementation , 2000 .

[12]  Aleh Cherp,et al.  EA legislation and practice in Central and Eastern Europe and the former USSR: A comparative analysis , 2001 .

[13]  Maria Rosário Partidário,et al.  Perspectives on strategic environmental assessment , 2000 .

[14]  A. W. Strigl Science, Research, Knowledge and Capacity Building , 2003 .

[15]  Hens Runhaar,et al.  What makes strategic environmental assessment successful environmental assessment? The role of context in the contribution of SEA to decision-making , 2007 .

[16]  Fred Carden,et al.  Organizational Assessment: A Framework for Improving Performance , 2002 .

[17]  J. Hammer,et al.  Weak Links in the Chain , 2000 .

[18]  Francois Retief,et al.  A performance evaluation of strategic environmental assessment (SEA) processes within the South African context , 2007 .

[19]  Paola Gazzola,et al.  SEA effectiveness criteria—equally valid in all countries? The case of Italy , 2006 .

[20]  Robert B. Gibson,et al.  STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AS A MEANS OF PURSUING SUSTAINABILITY: TEN ADVANTAGES AND TEN CHALLENGES , 2001 .

[21]  P. Gazzola WHAT APPEARS TO MAKE SEA EFFECTIVE IN DIFFERENT PLANNING SYSTEMS , 2008 .

[22]  Stacy D. Vandeveer,et al.  Capacity Development for the Environment: Broadening the Scope , 2005, Global Environmental Politics.