Image Noise Variance in 3D OSEM Reconstruction of Clinical Time-of-Flight PET

We have investigated image noise variance in 3D OSEM reconstruction of clinical time-of-flight (TOF) and conventional PET. Patient data were acquired on a biograph 16 PET/CT having 1.25 nsec TOF time resolution. Statistically independent replicate sinograms obtained from sampled listmode data were analyzed. We computed TOF and non-TOF image variance as a function of iteration number and scan time, extrapolated to convergence, and determined the dependence of both converged and post-smoothed image variances on scan duration. We have found that these image variances have an inverse power-law dependence on scan time, but with exponents < 1, likely due to the noise-dependent bias of OSEM. This means that scan time must be increased by more than a factor f in order to reduce image variance by 1/f, and hence that image variance is not inversely proportional to NEC. Image noise variance is found to be 38-48% higher for non-TOF compared to TOF, for equal scan time. For equal variance, conventional reconstruction requires 63-73% longer scan time than does TOF. This scan time advantage is similar to what we have observed in linear reconstruction, and indicates that TOF has a distinct benefit for clinical iterative reconstruction even with 1.25 nsec time resolution.

[1]  David G. Politte Image improvements in positron-emission tomography due to measuring differential time-of-flight and using maximum-likelihood estimation , 1990 .

[2]  B. Tsui,et al.  Noise properties of the EM algorithm: II. Monte Carlo simulations. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  Donald L. Snyder Some Noise Comparisons of Data-Collection Arrays for Emission Tomography-Systems Having Time-of-Flight Measurements , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[4]  C. Watson,et al.  An Evaluation of Image Noise Variance for Time-of-Flight PET , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[5]  T. Tomitani Image Reconstruction and Noise Evaluation in Photon Time-of-Flight Assisted Positron Emission Tomography , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[6]  Richard E. Carson,et al.  Precision and accuracy of regional radioactivity quantitation using the maximum likelihood EM reconstruction algorithm , 1994, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[7]  J. Czernin,et al.  Comparison of noise equivalent count rates and image noise , 2005 .

[8]  Maurizio Conti,et al.  First experimental results of time-of-flight reconstruction on an LSO PET scanner , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  Jinyi Qi,et al.  A unified noise analysis for iterative image estimation. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  Jeffrey A. Fessler Mean and variance of implicitly defined biased estimators (such as penalized maximum likelihood): applications to tomography , 1996, IEEE Trans. Image Process..