The coding of velocity of movement in the human visual system

A very simple model of velocity perception which requires only 17 channels is outlined. The important points of the model are that: (1) in each direction of movement just two temporal frequency channels are necessary at any spatial frequency, (2) at low temporal frequencies the spatial frequency domain is encoded by many channels, but only those at low spatial frequencies are direction-specific. Using a detection/discrimination technique the supposition that channels which detect high spatial, low temporal frequencies are not direction specific is investigated. Possible reasons for the apparent nondirectional behaviour of these channels are investigated: the notion that non-directionality reflects a failure of the stimulus to travel some threshold distance across the retina is rejected, but the proposal that a velocity threshold must be exceeded before the direction of a grating may be identified at detection threshold remains a possibility.

[1]  D. Burr Temporal summation of moving images by the human visual system , 1981, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[2]  J Hirsch,et al.  Limits of spatial-frequency discrimination as evidence of neural interpolation. , 1982, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[3]  P. Thompson Perceived rate of movement depends on contrast , 1982, Vision Research.

[4]  R A Smith,et al.  Adaptation of visual contrast sensitivity to specific temporal frequencies. , 1970, Vision research.

[5]  Brian J. Murphy,et al.  Summation and discrimination of gratings moving in opposite directions , 1980, Vision Research.

[6]  P. Thompson Discrimination of moving gratings at and above detection threshold , 1983, Vision Research.

[7]  C. Blakemore,et al.  Size Adaptation: A New Aftereffect , 1969, Science.

[8]  Hugh R. Wilson,et al.  Shifts in perceived size as a function of contrast and temporal modulation , 1983, Vision Research.

[9]  N. Graham,et al.  Detection of grating patterns containing two spatial frequencies: a comparison of single-channel and multiple-channels models. , 1971, Vision research.

[10]  R. Sekuler,et al.  The independence of channels in human vision selective for direction of movement. , 1975, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  J. Nachmias,et al.  Perceived direction of motion under retinal image stabilization , 1981, Vision Research.

[12]  P Lennie,et al.  Perceptual signs of parallel pathways. , 1980, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[13]  J. Bergen,et al.  A four mechanism model for threshold spatial vision , 1979, Vision Research.

[14]  N. Graham Spatial frequency channels in the human visual system: effects of luminance and pattern drift rate. , 1972, Vision research.

[15]  J. Robson,et al.  Discrimination at threshold: Labelled detectors in human vision , 1981, Vision Research.

[16]  C Blakemore,et al.  On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[17]  J. Robson,et al.  Grating summation in fovea and periphery , 1978, Vision Research.

[18]  William J. O'Connor,et al.  Drinking by dogs during and after running. , 1975, The Journal of physiology.

[19]  Colin Runciman Modula and a vision laboratory , 1981 .

[20]  A. Watson Probability summation over time , 1979, Vision Research.