Bureaucratic Job Mobility and The Diffusion of Innovations

In studies of innovation, policy entrepreneurs recognize latent demand for new policies and then expend resources to promote them. But studies of policy entrepreneurs have generally focused on the demand for innovation, while neglecting the supply side of policy entrepreneurship. This article argues that bureaucratic labor markets affect the emergence of policy entrepreneurs, and so affect the diffusion of policy innovations across local governments in the United States. Analysis of a survey of municipal police chiefs and water utility managers relates governments' hiring and promotion policies to their adoption of professionally fashionable innovations. Agency heads who advanced to their current positions diagonally (arriving from another organization) are more likely to initiate these innovations than are agency heads who were promoted from within. Bureaucratic policy entrepreneurs emerge where government demand for innovation meets a supply of mobile administrators, who carry the priorities of their professions into the agencies that they serve.

[1]  Jack L. Walker.  The Diffusion of Innovations among the American States , 1969, American Political Science Review.

[2]  R. Feiock,et al.  Testing Competing Explanations for Policy Adoption: Municipal Solid Waste Recycling Programs , 1993 .

[3]  Frederick J. Boehmke,et al.  Disentangling Diffusion: The Effects of Social Learning and Economic Competition on State Policy Innovation and Expansion , 2004 .

[4]  James G. March,et al.  Almost Random Careers: The Wisconsin School Superintendency, 1940-1972. , 1977 .

[5]  Charles R. Shipan,et al.  Bottom-Up Federalism: The Diffusion of Antismoking Policies from U.S. Cities to States , 2006 .

[6]  R. Feiock,et al.  Institutional Constraints and Policy Choice: An Exploration of Local Governance , 2001 .

[7]  Michael Mintrom,et al.  Policy Networks and Innovation Diffusion: The Case of State Education Reforms , 1998, The Journal of Politics.

[8]  P. May,et al.  State Environmental Policies: Analyzing Green Building Mandates , 2007 .

[9]  Alka Sapat.  Devolution and Innovation: The Adoption of State Environmental Policy Innovations by Administrative Agencies , 2004 .

[10]  Richard C. Feiock,et al.  Credible Commitment and Council-Manager Government: Implications for Policy Instrument Choices , 2003 .

[11]  R. Green.  The Profession of Local Government Management: Management Expertise and the American Community , 1989 .

[12]  E. Schall,et al.  Public-Sector Succession: A Strategic Approach to Sustaining Innovation , 1997 .

[13]  F. Thompson.  Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services , 1983 .

[14]  John Brehm,et al.  Working, Shirking, and Sabotage: Bureaucratic Response to a Democratic Public , 1997 .

[15]  M. Betsill,et al.  Cities and climate change , 2002 .

[16]  Virginia Gray,et al.  Innovation in the States: A Diffusion Study , 1973, American Political Science Review.

[17]  John W. Kingdon.  Agendas, alternatives, and public policies , 1984 .

[18]  David N. Ammons,et al.  Headhunters in Local Government: Use of Executive Search Firms in Managerial Selection , 1988 .

[19]  William D. Berry,et al.  State Lottery Adoptions as Policy Innovations: An Event History Analysis , 1990, American Political Science Review.

[20]  James C. Garand,et al.  Horizontal Diffusion, Vertical Diffusion, and Internal Pressure in State Environmental Policymaking, 1989-1998 , 2005 .

[21]  Herbert Kaufman,et al.  The Forest Ranger: A Study in Administrative Behavior , 1960 .

[22]  Frederick M. Wirt.  The Dependent City? External Influences upon Local Control , 1985, The Journal of Politics.

[23]  Richard O. Carlson.  Succession and Performance Among School Superintendents , 1961 .

[24]  Arthur L. Dakyns,et al.  Democracy and the Public Service , 1935 .

[25]  Michael Mintrom,et al.  Policy Entrepreneurs and School Choice , 2000 .

[26]  William D. Berry,et al.  Tax Innovation in the States: Capitalizing on Political Opportunity , 1992 .

[27]  Luc Bernier,et al.  The Changing Nature of Public Entrepreneurship , 2007 .

[28]  R. Crain,et al.  Structure and Values in Local Political Systems: The Case of Fluoridation Decisions , 1966, The Journal of Politics.

[29]  Mark K. Cassell,et al.  When Do States Pursue Targeted Economic Development Policies? The Adoption and Expansion of State Enterprise Zone Programs , 2007 .

[30]  Lawrence B. Mohr,et al.  Determinants of Innovation in Organizations , 1969, American Political Science Review.

[31]  D. Carpenter.  The Forging of Bureaucratic Autonomy , 2020 .

[32]  Citizen Voice and Public Entrepreneurship: The Organizational Dynamic of a Complex Metropolitan County , 1988 .

[33]  Dorothy M. Daley.  Voluntary Approaches to Environmental Problems: Exploring the Rise of Nontraditional Public Policy , 2007 .

[34]  M. Lipsky,et al.  Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. , 1982 .

[35]  W. C. Chambliss.  The silent service , 1959 .

[36]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[37]  Gregory J. Wawro.  Legislative entrepreneurship in the U.S. House of Representatives , 2000 .

[38]  J. R. Hook,et al.  Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do And Why They Do It , 1991 .

[39]  E. Schall.  Notes from a Reflective Practitioner of Innovation , 1997 .

[40]  Steven J. Balla,et al.  Interstate Professional Associations and the Diffusion of Policy Innovations , 2001 .

[41]  M. Mintrom,et al.  Policy entrepreneurs and the diffusion of innovation , 1997 .