Coordinating With a Robot Partner Affects Neural Processing Related to Action Monitoring
暂无分享,去创建一个
Danica Kragic | Peter König | Mårten Björkman | Anna L. Gert | Ali Ghadirzadeh | Ashima Keshava | Benedikt V. Ehinger | Artur Czeszumski | Tilman Kalthoff | Max Tiessen | P. König | Ali Ghadirzadeh | D. Kragic | Mårten Björkman | Artur Czeszumski | Ashima Keshava | Tilman Kalthoff | Max Tiessen
[1] Agnieszka Wykowska,et al. Robot Gaze Behavior Affects Honesty in Human-Robot Interaction , 2021, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence.
[2] B. Wiederhold. The Ascent of Social Robots , 2021, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..
[3] Benedikt V. Ehinger,et al. Regression-based analysis of combined EEG and eye-tracking data: Theory and applications , 2021, Journal of vision.
[4] Jan R. Wessel,et al. #EEGManyLabs: Investigating the replicability of influential EEG experiments , 2020, Cortex.
[5] Leonard S. Peperkoorn,et al. The prevalence of dyads in social life , 2020, PloS one.
[6] Gordon Cheng,et al. Neuroengineering challenges of fusing robotics and neuroscience , 2020, Science Robotics.
[7] F. Ciardo,et al. ERP markers of action planning and outcome monitoring in human - robot interaction. , 2020, Acta psychologica.
[8] A. Kingstone,et al. Humans share task load with a computer partner if (they believe that) it acts human-like. , 2020, Acta psychologica.
[9] Daniel Polani,et al. Tilting Together: An Information-Theoretic Characterization of Behavioral Roles in Rhythmic Dyadic Interaction , 2020, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.
[10] Peter König,et al. Hyperscanning: A Valid Method to Study Neural Inter-brain Underpinnings of Social Interaction , 2020, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.
[11] Olaf Dimigen,et al. Optimizing the ICA-based removal of ocular EEG artifacts from free viewing experiments , 2020, NeuroImage.
[12] Samuel A. Nastase,et al. Keep it real: rethinking the primacy of experimental control in cognitive neuroscience , 2020, NeuroImage.
[13] Gordon Cheng,et al. A computational model of human decision making and learning for assessment of co-adaptation in neuro-adaptive human-robot interaction , 2019, 2019 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (SMC).
[14] Martin Wetzels,et al. Trust in humanoid robots: implications for services marketing , 2019, Journal of Services Marketing.
[15] Arianna Curioni,et al. Reciprocal information flow and role distribution support joint action coordination , 2019, Cognition.
[16] E. Redcay,et al. Using second-person neuroscience to elucidate the mechanisms of social interaction , 2019, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.
[17] Ricardo Chavarriaga,et al. Inferring subjective preferences on robot trajectories using EEG signals , 2019, 2019 9th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER).
[18] Catherine Perrodin,et al. Are We Ready for Real-world Neuroscience? , 2019, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[19] Kenneth Kreutz-Delgado,et al. ICLabel: An automated electroencephalographic independent component classifier, dataset, and website , 2019, NeuroImage.
[20] Gordon Cheng,et al. A Feasibility Study for Validating Robot Actions Using EEG-Based Error-Related Potentials , 2018, International Journal of Social Robotics.
[21] Takako Fujioka,et al. Performance monitoring of self and other in a turn-taking piano duet: A dual-EEG study , 2018, Social neuroscience.
[22] Benedikt V. Ehinger,et al. The Social Situation Affects How We Process Feedback About Our Actions , 2018, bioRxiv.
[23] Gordon Cheng,et al. Human-agent co-adaptation using error-related potentials , 2018, Journal of neural engineering.
[24] N. Sebanz,et al. Joint action coordination in expert-novice pairs: Can experts predict novices’ suboptimal timing? , 2018, Cognition.
[25] A. Diamond. Robots and Computers Enhance Us More Than They Replace Us , 2018, The American Economist.
[26] Lucian Gheorghe,et al. Decoding Neural Correlates of Cognitive States to Enhance Driving Experience , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence.
[27] Olaf Dimigen,et al. Unfold: an integrated toolbox for overlap correction, non-linear modeling, and regression-based EEG analysis , 2018, bioRxiv.
[28] H. Blume,et al. Effect- and Performance-Based Auditory Feedback on Interpersonal Coordination , 2018, Front. Psychol..
[29] Vijay Kumar,et al. The grand challenges of Science Robotics , 2018, Science Robotics.
[30] Mordechai Ben-Ari,et al. Robots and Their Applications , 2018 .
[31] Katia Sycara,et al. The role of trust in human-robot interaction , 2018 .
[32] Frank Kirchner,et al. Intrinsic interactive reinforcement learning – Using error-related potentials for real world human-robot interaction , 2017, Scientific Reports.
[33] Cordula Vesper,et al. Modulating Action Duration to Establish Nonconventional Communication , 2017, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[34] Joseph DelPreto,et al. Correcting robot mistakes in real time using EEG signals , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).
[35] Sylvain Baillet,et al. Magnetoencephalography for brain electrophysiology and imaging , 2017, Nature Neuroscience.
[36] M. A. MacIver,et al. Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias , 2017, Neuron.
[37] E. Broadbent. Interactions With Robots: The Truths We Reveal About Ourselves , 2017, Annual review of psychology.
[38] Günther Knoblich,et al. Joint Action in Humans: A Model for Human-Robot Interactions , 2017 .
[39] G. Cheng,et al. Embodied artificial agents for understanding human social cognition , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[40] Thomas B. Sheridan,et al. Human–Robot Interaction , 2016, Hum. Factors.
[41] O. Khatib,et al. The rise of social robots : a review of the recent literature , 2016 .
[42] R Chavarriaga,et al. EEG-based decoding of error-related brain activity in a real-world driving task , 2015, Journal of neural engineering.
[43] Ricardo Chavarriaga,et al. Teaching brain-machine interfaces as an alternative paradigm to neuroprosthetics control , 2015, Scientific Reports.
[44] Erich Schröger,et al. Digital filter design for electrophysiological data – a practical approach , 2015, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.
[45] Peter König,et al. Predictions of Visual Content across Eye Movements and Their Modulation by Inferred Information , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[46] Daniel C. Richardson,et al. Progress in Joint-Action Research , 2021, CogSci.
[47] G. Pezzulo,et al. Human Sensorimotor Communication: A Theory of Signaling in Online Social Interactions , 2013, PloS one.
[48] K. Vogeley,et al. Toward a second-person neuroscience 1 , 2013, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
[49] Janeen D. Loehr,et al. Monitoring Individual and Joint Action Outcomes in Duet Music Performance , 2013, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[50] Holly A. Yanco,et al. Impact of robot failures and feedback on real-time trust , 2013, 2013 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).
[51] Ramin Khatami,et al. Advanced EEG analysis using threshold-free cluster-enhancement and non-parametric statistics , 2013, NeuroImage.
[52] Yoshio Matsumoto,et al. How Do People Perceive and Trust a Lifelike Robot , 2013 .
[53] Marco Ferrari,et al. A brief review on the history of human functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) development and fields of application , 2012, NeuroImage.
[54] Carsten Zoll,et al. The Social Role of Robots in the Future—Explorative Measurement of Hopes and Fears , 2011, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.
[55] Cordula Vesper,et al. A minimal architecture for joint action , 2010, Neural Networks.
[56] John J. B. Allen,et al. Prelude to and Resolution of an Error: EEG Phase Synchrony Reveals Cognitive Control Dynamics during Action Monitoring , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[57] Bhaskar D. Rao,et al. Newton method for the ICA mixture model , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.
[58] Clay B. Holroyd,et al. The feedback-related negativity reflects the binary evaluation of good versus bad outcomes , 2006, Biological Psychology.
[59] H. Bekkering,et al. Joint action: bodies and minds moving together , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[60] Jonathan D. Cohen,et al. The neural basis of error detection: conflict monitoring and the error-related negativity. , 2004, Psychological review.
[61] H. Bekkering,et al. Modulation of activity in medial frontal and motor cortices during error observation , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.
[62] Arnaud Delorme,et al. EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.
[63] Matthew D. Lieberman,et al. Does Rejection Hurt? An fMRI Study of Social Exclusion , 2003, Science.
[64] W. Prinz,et al. Representing others' actions: just like one's own? , 2003, Cognition.
[65] C. Braun,et al. Event-Related Brain Potentials Following Incorrect Feedback in a Time-Estimation Task: Evidence for a Generic Neural System for Error Detection , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[66] S J Luck,et al. Spatial filtering during visual search: evidence from human electrophysiology. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[67] C. E. Rogers,et al. Symbolic Description of Factorial Models for Analysis of Variance , 1973 .
[68] Keh-Shew Lu,et al. DIGITAL FILTER DESIGN , 1973 .