Life cycle inventory comparison of different building insulation materials and uncertainty analysis

Abstract Building insulation materials have a significant effect on the reduction of heating/cooling energy consumptions of buildings. From a life cycle perspective, the comparison of different types of insulation materials should consider the building energy consumption together with the environmental emissions during the manufacturing, production, transportation, using and recycling phases of insulation materials. However, this comparison suffers from many sources of uncertainty, especially the parameter identification of insulation materials. In this study, a life cycle inventory analysis model is established and applied to compare the life cycle performance of eight types of insulation materials in an uncertain framework. For each parameter, a probability density function is explicitly specified through a parameter identification process, and the data uncertainty is propagated by Monte-Carlo simulation, the inventory analysis results are transformed from a concrete value into a probability distribution around a mean value, and sensitivity analysis is implemented to identify uncertainty and variability affecting produced the life cycle assessment (LCA). The simulation results revealed that physical parameters have a significant contribution to the uncertainty of the insulation materials, especially for life cycle energy consumption of glass wool, the maximum value may even be quadrupled compares to the minimum value. The decision maker may change the choice of insulation materials when data uncertainty is taken into consideration in LCA.

[1]  Agis M. Papadopoulos,et al.  An assessment tool for the energy, economic and environmental evaluation of thermal insulation solutions , 2009 .

[2]  Uniben Yao Ayikoe Tettey,et al.  Effects of different insulation materials on primary energy and CO2 emission of a multi-storey residential building , 2014 .

[3]  Som S Shrestha,et al.  A protocol for lifetime energy and environmental impact assessment of building insulation materials , 2014 .

[4]  S. Dilmac,et al.  Analysis of the effect of production process parameters and density of expanded polystyrene insulation boards on mechanical properties and thermal conductivity , 2008 .

[5]  Amaryllis Audenaert,et al.  LCA of low-energy flats using the Eco-indicator 99 method: Impact of insulation materials , 2012 .

[6]  Arnold Tukker,et al.  Uncertainty in life cycle impact assessment of toxic releases practical experiences - arguments for a reductionalistic approach? , 1998 .

[7]  Fausto Freire,et al.  Integrated life-cycle assessment and thermal dynamic simulation of alternative scenarios for the roof retrofit of a house , 2014 .

[8]  J. William Owens,et al.  LCA impact assessment categories , 1996 .

[9]  Технология Springer Science+Business Media , 2013 .

[10]  Mark A. J. Huijbregts,et al.  Application of uncertainty and variability in LCA , 1998 .

[11]  Gu Lijing,et al.  Life cycle assessment for China building environment impacts , 2006 .

[12]  Agis M. Papadopoulos,et al.  State of the art in thermal insulation materials and aims for future developments , 2005 .

[13]  Kambiz Rakhshan,et al.  Evaluating the sustainability impact of improved building insulation: A case study in the Dubai residential built environment , 2013 .

[14]  Robert Ries,et al.  Characterizing, Propagating, and Analyzing Uncertainty in Life‐Cycle Assessment: A Survey of Quantitative Approaches , 2007 .

[15]  T. Bedford,et al.  Probabilistic Risk Analysis: Foundations and Methods , 2001 .

[16]  Allan Astrup Jensen,et al.  A comparative Life Cycle assessment of building insulation products made of stone wool, paper wool and flax , 2004 .

[17]  Zhu Jian-fang,et al.  Technology Progress of Thermal Insulation Materials of Building Energy Efficiency , 2009 .

[18]  Figen Balo,et al.  Effect of fuel type on the optimum thickness of selected insulation materials for the four different climatic regions of Turkey , 2009 .

[19]  Maurizio Cellura,et al.  Building energy performance : A LCA case study of kenaf-fibres insulation board , 2008 .

[20]  Figen Balo,et al.  Determination of environmental impact and optimum thickness of insulation for building walls , 2011 .

[21]  Meral Özel,et al.  Optimum location and distribution of insulation layers on building walls with various orientations , 2007 .

[22]  Meral Ozel,et al.  Effect of wall orientation on the optimum insulation thickness by using a dynamic method , 2011 .

[23]  Wu Wei-wei Optimizing insulation thickness of external walls for residential buildings , 2008 .

[24]  Agis M. Papadopoulos,et al.  Environmental performance evaluation of thermal insulation materials and its impact on the building , 2007 .

[25]  Ö. Altan Dombaycı,et al.  Optimization of insulation thickness for external walls using different energy-sources , 2004 .

[26]  Patrick Hofstetter,et al.  Perspectives in Life Cycle Impact Assessment: A Structured Approach to Combine Models of the Technosphere, Ecosphere and Valuesphere , 2012 .

[27]  Kemal Çomaklı,et al.  Optimum insulation thickness of external walls for energy saving , 2003 .