Simulating User Learning in Authoritative Technology Adoption: An Agent Based Model for Council-Led Smart Meter Deployment Planning in the UK

How do technology users effectively transit from having zero knowledge about a technology to making the best use of it after an authoritative technology adoption? This post-adoption user learning has received little research attention in technology management literature. In this paper we investigate user learning in authoritative technology adoption by developing an agent-based model using the case of council-led smart meter deployment in the UK City of Leeds. Energy consumers gain experience of using smart meters based on the learning curve in behavioural learning. With the agent-based model we carry out experiments to validate the model and test different energy interventions that local authorities can use to facilitate energy consumers' learning and maintain their continuous use of the technology. Our results show that the easier energy consumers become experienced, the more energy-efficient they are and the more energy saving they can achieve; encouraging energy consumers' contacts via various informational means can facilitate their learning; and developing and maintaining their positive attitude toward smart metering can enable them to use the technology continuously. Contributions and energy policy/intervention implications are discussed in this paper.

[1]  N. Rosenberg Factors affecting the diffusion of technology , 1972 .

[2]  Frederick Mosteller,et al.  Stochastic Models for Learning , 1956 .

[3]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Understanding Post-Adoption Behavior in the Context of Online Services , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[4]  W. Jager Modelling consumer behaviour , 2000 .

[5]  Mari Martiskainen,et al.  The role of smart meters in encouraging behavioural change - prospects for the UK , 2009 .

[6]  P. Geroski Models of technology diffusion , 2000 .

[7]  John A. Howard Marketing Management: Analysis and Planning , 2017 .

[8]  J. Jacoby,et al.  Consumer Behavior , 2024 .

[9]  Z. Griliches HYBRID CORN: AN EXPLORATION IN THE ECONOMIC OF TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE , 1957 .

[10]  Anthony Vlasic,et al.  Post-adoption behavior of users of Internet Service Providers , 2007, Inf. Manag..

[11]  Jürgen Weigand,et al.  Agent-based simulation of policy induced diffusion of smart meters , 2014 .

[12]  Greta Barnicoat,et al.  The ageing population and smart metering: A field study of householders’ attitudes and behaviours towards energy use in Scotland , 2015 .

[13]  Stephen Davies,et al.  The patterns of induced diffusion: Evidence from the international diffusion of wind energy , 2011 .

[14]  E. Mansfield TECHNICAL CHANGE AND THE RATE OF IMITATION , 1961 .

[15]  T. Foxon,et al.  Strategic energy planning within local authorities in the UK: A study of the city of Leeds , 2012 .

[16]  Lalit Mohan Saini,et al.  Performance analysis of smart metering for smart grid: An overview , 2015 .

[17]  Marco Janssen,et al.  An integrated approach to simulating behavioural processes: A case study of the lock-in of consumption patterns , 1999, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[18]  W. Estes,et al.  A theory of stimulus variability in learning. , 1953, Psychological review.

[19]  S. Owens,et al.  How to change attitudes and behaviours in the context of energy , 2008 .

[20]  Nina Schwarz,et al.  Agent-based modeling of the diffusion of environmental innovations — An empirical approach , 2009 .

[21]  Peter D. Bennett,et al.  Prepurchase Information Seeking Behavior of New Car Purchasers—The Learning Hypothesis , 1969 .

[22]  Dirk Ifenthaler,et al.  Stochastic Models of Learning , 2012 .

[23]  Bronwyn H Hall,et al.  Adoption of New Technology , 2003 .

[24]  S. Abu-Sharkha,et al.  Can microgrids make a major contribution to UK energy supply ? , 2005 .

[25]  C. Anthony Di Benedetto,et al.  Diffusion of Innovation , 2015 .

[26]  Xudong Zhao,et al.  Case Study of Smart Meter and In-home Display for Residential Behavior Change in Shanghai, China , 2015 .

[27]  A. B. Haney,et al.  Smart Metering and Electricity Demand: Technology, Economics and International Experience , 2009 .

[28]  Victor I. Chang,et al.  How Blockchain can impact financial services – The overview, challenges and recommendations from expert interviewees , 2020, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[29]  Ivan Diaz-Rainey,et al.  Induced Diffusion: Definition, Review and Suggestions for Further Research , 2009 .

[30]  Robert L. Axtell,et al.  WHY AGENTS? ON THE VARIED MOTIVATIONS FOR AGENT COMPUTING IN THE SOCIAL SCIENCES , 2000 .

[31]  Theodore J. Gordon,et al.  A simple agent model of an epidemic , 2003 .

[32]  R. Walker,et al.  Simulation models , 1999 .

[33]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[34]  W. Estes Toward a Statistical Theory of Learning. , 1994 .

[35]  Uwe Aickelin,et al.  A First Approach on Modelling Staff Proactiveness in Retail Simulation Models , 2011, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[36]  W. F. V. Raaij,et al.  Consumer Behaviour: A European Perspective , 1999 .

[37]  Tao Zhang,et al.  A Three-Dimensional Model of Residential Energy Consumer Archetypes for Local Energy Policy Design in the UK , 2012, ArXiv.

[38]  A. Weil,et al.  Diffusion of Innovation , 2020, The International Encyclopedia of Media Psychology.

[39]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Information Technology Adoption Across Time: A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Pre-Adoption and Post-Adoption Beliefs , 1999, MIS Q..

[40]  William Rand,et al.  Agent-Based Modeling in Marketing: Guidelines for Rigor , 2011 .

[41]  Tao Zhang,et al.  Modelling Electricity Consumption in Office Buildings: An Agent Based Approach , 2013, ArXiv.

[42]  James Keirstead,et al.  London and beyond: Taking a closer look at urban energy policy , 2010 .