The identifiability analysis for setting up measuring campaigns in integrated water quality modelling

Abstract Identifiability analysis enables the quantification of the number of model parameters that can be assessed by calibration with respect to a data set. Such a methodology is based on the appraisal of sensitivity coefficients of the model parameters by means of Monte Carlo runs. By employing the Fisher Information Matrix, the methodology enables one to gain insights with respect to the number of model parameters that can be reliably assessed. The paper presents a study where identifiability analysis is used as a tool for setting up measuring campaigns for integrated water quality modelling. Particularly, by means of the identifiability analysis, the information about the location and the number of the monitoring stations in the integrated system required for assessing a specific group of model parameters were gained. The analysis has been applied to a real, partially urbanised, catchment containing two sewer systems, two wastewater treatment plants and a river. Several scenarios of measuring campaigns have been considered; each scenario was characterised by different monitoring station locations for the gathering of quantity and quality data. The results enabled us to assess the maximum number of model parameters quantifiable for each scenario i.e. for each data set. The methodology resulted to be a powerful tool for designing measuring campaign for integrated water quality modelling. Indeed, the crucial cross sections throughout the integrated wastewater system were detected optimizing both human and economic efforts in the gathering of field data. Further, a connection between the data set and the number of model parameters effectively assessable has been established leading to much more reliable model results.

[1]  Javier Lafuente,et al.  Systematic identifiability study based on the Fisher Information Matrix for reducing the number of parameters calibration of an activated sludge model , 2009, Environ. Model. Softw..

[2]  S. Marsili-Libelli,et al.  Water quality modelling for small river basins , 2008, Environ. Model. Softw..

[3]  Stefan Weijers,et al.  A procedure for selecting best identifiable parameters in calibrating activated sludge model no. 1 to full-scale plant data , 1997 .

[4]  S. Marsili-Libelli,et al.  Reliability of parameter estimation in respirometric models. , 2005, Water research.

[5]  Dirk De Pauw,et al.  Optimal experimental design for calibration of bioprocess models: a validated software toolbox , 2005 .

[6]  Keith Beven,et al.  The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction. , 1992 .

[7]  H. D. Stensel,et al.  Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Reuse , 2002 .

[8]  G. Freni,et al.  Uncertainty in urban stormwater quality modelling: the effect of acceptability threshold in the GLUE methodology. , 2008, Water research.

[9]  Peter Krebs,et al.  Setting up measuring campaigns for integrated wastewater modelling , 1999 .

[10]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  Survey of sampling-based methods for uncertainty and sensitivity analysis , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[11]  Gabriele Freni,et al.  Quantification of diffuse and concentrated pollutant loads at the watershed-scale: an Italian case study. , 2009, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[12]  G. Freni,et al.  Uncertainty assessment of an integrated urban drainage model , 2009 .

[13]  Gabriele Freni,et al.  Assessment of data availability influence on integrated urban drainage modelling uncertainty , 2009, Environ. Model. Softw..

[14]  Peter Reichert,et al.  Practical identifiability of ASM2d parameters--systematic selection and tuning of parameter subsets. , 2002, Water research.

[15]  William M. Alley,et al.  Estimation of accumulation parameters for urban runoff quality modeling , 1981 .

[16]  Gabriele Freni,et al.  Urban water quality modelling: a parsimonious holistic approach for a complex real case study. , 2010, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[17]  George Kuczera,et al.  Monte Carlo assessment of parameter uncertainty in conceptual catchment models: the Metropolis algorithm , 1998 .

[18]  Gabriele Freni,et al.  Assessment of the integrated urban water quality model complexity through identifiability analysis. , 2011, Water research.

[19]  I. Takács A dynamic model of the clarification-thickening process , 1991 .

[20]  Giorgio Mannina,et al.  Separate and combined sewer systems: a long-term modelling approach. , 2009, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[21]  Petre Stoica,et al.  Decentralized Control , 2018, The Control Systems Handbook.

[22]  A. Jakeman,et al.  How much complexity is warranted in a rainfall‐runoff model? , 1993 .

[23]  P A Vanrolleghem,et al.  Deterministic modelling of integrated urban drainage systems. , 2002, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[24]  T. M. Parchure,et al.  Erosion of soft cohesive sediment deposits , 1985 .

[25]  P. Reichert,et al.  Identifiability and uncertainty analysis of the river water quality model no. 1 (RWQM1). , 2001, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[26]  G. Viviani,et al.  An urban drainage stormwater quality model model development and uncertainty quantification , 2010 .