Bias in freshwater biodiversity sampling: the case of Iberian water beetles

Extensive distributional data bases are key tools in ecological research, and good‐quality data are required to provide reliable conservation strategies and an understanding of biodiversity patterns and processes. Although the evaluation of data bases requires the incorporation of estimates of sampling effort and bias, no studies have focused on these aspects for freshwater biodiversity data. We used here a comprehensive data base of water beetles from the Iberian Peninsula and the Balearic Islands, and examine whether these data provide an unbiased, reliable picture of their diversity and distribution in the study area. Based on theoretical estimates using the Clench function on the accumulated number of records as a surrogate of sampling effort, about a quarter of the Iberian and Balearic 50 × 50 km Universal Transverse Mercator grid cells can be considered well prospected, with more than 70% of the theoretical species richness actually recorded. These well‐surveyed cells are not evenly distributed across biogeographical and physicoclimatic subregions, reflecting some geographical bias in the distribution of sampling effort. Our results suggest that recording was skewed by relatively simple variables affecting collector activity, such as the perceived ‘attractiveness’ of mountainous landscapes and protected areas with recently described species, and accessibility of sampling sites (distance from main research centres). We emphasize the importance of these evaluation exercises, which are useful to locate areas needed of further sampling as well as to identify potential biases in the distribution of current biodiversity patterns.

[1]  Gilberto SALESa,et al.  AQUATIC CONSERVATION: MARINE AND FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS , 2010 .

[2]  T. Lovejoy Climate change and biodiversity. , 2008, Revue scientifique et technique.

[3]  J. Lobo More complex distribution models or more representative data , 2008 .

[4]  J. Lobo,et al.  How does the knowledge about the spatial distribution of Iberian dung beetle species accumulate over time? , 2007 .

[5]  Alberto Jiménez-Valverde,et al.  Limitations of Biodiversity Databases: Case Study on Seed‐Plant Diversity in Tenerife, Canary Islands , 2007, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[6]  Jorge Soberón,et al.  Assessing completeness of biodiversity databases at different spatial scales , 2007 .

[7]  Jorge M. Lobo,et al.  Identifying recorder-induced geographic bias in an Iberian butterfly database , 2006 .

[8]  J. Lobo,et al.  A synecological framework for systematic conservation planning , 2006 .

[9]  The Hydradephaga of the Segura basin (SE Spain): twentyfive years studying water beetles (Coleoptera) , 2006 .

[10]  Roger L. H. Dennis,et al.  The effects of visual apparency on bias in butterfly recording and monitoring , 2006 .

[11]  J. Hortal,et al.  Evaluating the performance of species richness estimators: sensitivity to sample grain size. , 2006, The Journal of animal ecology.

[12]  Andrés Millán,et al.  Are Water Beetles Good Indicators of Biodiversity in Mediterranean Aquatic Ecosystems? The Case of the Segura River Basin (SE Spain) , 2006, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[13]  S. Ferrier,et al.  Survey-gap analysis in expeditionary research: where do we go from here? , 2005 .

[14]  E. Martínez‐Meyer Climate Change and Biodiversity: Some Considerations in Forecasting Shifts in Species' Potential Distributions , 2005 .

[15]  Andrés Millán,et al.  Conservation of Freshwater Biodiversity: a Comparison of Different Area Selection Methods , 2005, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[16]  J. Lobo,et al.  An ED-based Protocol for Optimal Sampling of Biodiversity , 2005, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[17]  C. Lévêque,et al.  An assessment of animal species diversity in continental waters , 2005, Hydrobiologia.

[18]  A. Millán,et al.  Selecting areas to protect the biodiversity of aquatic ecosystems in a semiarid Mediterranean region using water beetles , 2004 .

[19]  A. Peterson,et al.  New developments in museum-based informatics and applications in biodiversity analysis. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[20]  A. Peterson,et al.  Biodiversity informatics: managing and applying primary biodiversity data. , 2004, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[21]  J. Hortal,et al.  Butterfly species richness in mainland Portugal: predictive models of geographic distribution patterns , 2004 .

[22]  J. Lobo,et al.  Forecasting insect species richness scores in poorly surveyed territories: the case of the Portuguese dung beetles (Col. Scarabaeinae) , 2001, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[23]  R. Dennis Progressive bias in species status is symptomatic of fine-grained mapping units subject to repeated sampling , 2001, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[24]  R. Dennis,et al.  Bias in Butterfly Distribution Maps: The Influence of Hot Spots and Recorder's Home Range , 2000, Journal of Insect Conservation.

[25]  R. M. Nally Regression and model-building in conservation biology, biogeography and ecology: The distinction between – and reconciliation of – ‘predictive’ and ‘explanatory’ models , 2000, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[26]  R. Dennis,et al.  Bias in Butterfly Distribution Maps: The Effects of Sampling Effort , 1999, Journal of Insect Conservation.

[27]  M. Austin,et al.  Searching for a model for use in vegetation analysis , 1980, Vegetatio.

[28]  J. Lobo,et al.  Ten years inventorying the Iberian fauna: results and perspectives , 2004, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[29]  S. Reddy,et al.  Geographical sampling bias and its implications for conservation priorities in Africa , 2003 .

[30]  A. Hirzel,et al.  Modelling habitat‐suitability using museum collections: an example with three sympatric Apodemus species from the Alps , 2003 .

[31]  R. Dennis,et al.  Gains and losses of French butterflies: tests of predictions, under-recording and regional extinction from data in a new atlas , 2003 .

[32]  Alberto Jiménez-Valverde,et al.  Las curvas de acumulación de especies y la necesidad de evaluar la calidad de los inventarios biológicos , 2003 .

[33]  A. Lehmann,et al.  Predicting species spatial distributions using presence-only data: a case study of native New Zealand ferns , 2002 .

[34]  J. M. Rey Benayas,et al.  Plant diversity, biogeography and environment in Iberia: Patterns and possible causal factors , 2002 .

[35]  Jorge M. Lobo,et al.  Searching for a Predictive Model for Species Richness of Iberian Dung Beetle Based on Spatial and Environmental Variables , 2002, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[36]  J. Velasco,et al.  Los coleópteros y heterópteros acuáticos y semiacuáticos de la provincia de Albacete: catálogo faunístico y estudio ecológico , 2002 .

[37]  A. Chiarucci,et al.  Evaluation and monitoring of the flora in a nature reserve by estimation methods , 2001 .

[38]  Robert K. Colwell,et al.  Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness , 2001 .

[39]  R. Mittermeier,et al.  Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities , 2000, Nature.

[40]  I. Ribera Biogeography and conservation of Iberian water beetles , 2000 .

[41]  Anthony Ricciardi,et al.  Extinction Rates of North American Freshwater Fauna , 1999 .

[42]  D. Roy,et al.  Integrating species and habitat data for nature conservation in Great Britain: data sources and methods , 1999 .

[43]  Jorgen B. Thomsen,et al.  Biodiversity Hotspots and Major Tropical Wilderness Areas: Approaches to Setting Conservation Priorities , 1998 .

[44]  James R. Aldrich,et al.  Rivers of Life: Critical Watersheds for Protecting Freshwater Diversity , 1998 .

[45]  P. Quézel La flore du bassin méditerranéen : origine, mise en place, endémisme , 1995 .

[46]  Robert K. Colwell,et al.  Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. , 1994, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[47]  P. Legendre Spatial Autocorrelation: Trouble or New Paradigm? , 1993 .

[48]  Jorge SoberónM.,et al.  The Use of Species Accumulation Functions for the Prediction of Species Richness , 1993 .

[49]  John H. Lawton,et al.  Correcting for variation in recording effort in analyses of diversity hotspots , 1993 .

[50]  Alexander S. Flecker,et al.  Biodiversity conservation in running waters , 1993 .

[51]  A. O. Nicholls How to make biological surveys go further with generalised linear models , 1989 .