Comparison studies of different measurement methods using a Coordinate Measuring Arm are presented. Studies were divided into two parts. The first was point measurements of contact and pseudo- scanning contact measurements. The second part consisted of point measurements of contact and non- contact scanning measurements. Contact research (point measurements and the pseudo-scanning) were accomplished with the use of PowerINSPECT software, whereas non-contact with use of Focus Handheld and Focus Inspection software. Handheld Focus was used to collect a point cloud and its processing, while the detection of set elements was made using the second software from the group of Focus. According to the developed procedure for both parts sample elements with known nominal values were measured (available CAD model of object of research). It became the basis for examining whether there are statistically significant differences between resul ts of different methods in both parts. Statistical comparison of measurement methods was carried out using four tests: Comparison of Means, Comparison of Standard Deviations, Comparison of Medians and a KolmogorovSmirnov Test.
[1]
Władysław Jakubiec,et al.
Analytical estimation of coordinate measurement uncertainty
,
2012
.
[2]
Jerzy Sładek,et al.
The Hybrid Coordinate Measurement System as a Response to Industrial Requirements
,
2010
.
[3]
Władysław Jakubiec.
Estimation of Uncertainty of Coordinate Measurements According to the Type B Method
,
2010
.
[4]
Malgorzata Poniatowska,et al.
Fitting Spatial Models of Geometric Deviations of Free-Form Surfaces Determined in Coordinate Measurements
,
2010
.
[5]
M. Poniatowska,et al.
Simulation Tests of the Method for Determining a CAD Model of Free-Form Surface Deterministic Deviations
,
2012
.
[6]
Maøgorzata Poniatowska,et al.
RESEARCH ON SPATIAL INTERRELATIONS OF GEOMETRIC DEVIATIONS DETERMINED IN COORDINATE MEASUREMENTS OF FREE-FORM SURFACES
,
2009
.