Monitoring the wetting phase of fluidized bed granulation process using multi-way methods: The separation of successful from unsuccessful batches

Fluidized bed granulation of a pharmaceutical mixture and wet granulation in general is an unpredictable and complex process. Usually the few variables that are known to indicate the granulation end-point are monitored independently but at the same time simultaneously. If one wishes to control the complex process and evaluate how this is affected by different physical and chemical granulation phases and variables measured then multivariate analysis and appropriate controlling tools need to be incorporated into the process line. It is also important to obtain early warnings from the process line when the process is already or about to develop in an unwanted direction. Multivariate tools in conjunction with process variables or spectroscopic data can reveal the latent structure of the process. In this study, multi-way models together with a few process variables have been utilized to distinguish successful batch granulations from unsuccessful runs. The batch-to-batch variation of different runs is handled using the special multi-way data structure of the experiments.

[1]  R. Bro,et al.  A new efficient method for determining the number of components in PARAFAC models , 2003 .

[2]  Theodora Kourti,et al.  Process Analytical Technology Beyond Real-Time Analyzers: The Role of Multivariate Analysis , 2006 .

[3]  R C Rowe,et al.  Process control and scale-up of pharmaceutical wet granulation processes: a review. , 2001, European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V.

[4]  Barry M. Wise,et al.  Application of PARAFAC2 to fault detection and diagnosis in semiconductor etch , 2001 .

[5]  Claus A. Andersson,et al.  PARAFAC2—Part II. Modeling chromatographic data with retention time shifts , 1999 .

[6]  A. J. Morris,et al.  On‐line monitoring of batch processes using a PARAFAC representation , 2003 .

[7]  D L Massart,et al.  Using experimental design to optimize the process parameters in fluidized bed granulation on a semi-full scale. , 2001, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[8]  Hiroyuki Tsujimoto,et al.  Monitoring particle fluidization in a fluidized bed granulator with an acoustic emission sensor , 2000 .

[9]  R. Bro,et al.  PARAFAC2—Part I. A direct fitting algorithm for the PARAFAC2 model , 1999 .

[10]  R. Bro,et al.  Centering and scaling in component analysis , 2003 .

[11]  M. Aulton Pharmaceutics : the science of dosage form design , 2002 .

[12]  Mehrdji Hemati,et al.  Fluidized bed coating and granulation: influence of process-related variables and physicochemical properties on the growth kinetics , 2003 .

[13]  S. Reinikainen,et al.  Predicting the drug concentration in starch acetate matrix tablets from ATR-FTIR spectra using multi-way methods. , 2007, Analytica chimica acta.

[14]  Jean Paul Remon,et al.  Continuous granulation in the pharmaceutical industry , 2005 .

[15]  D L Massart,et al.  Using Experimental Design to Optimize the Process Parameters in Fluidized Bed Granulation , 2001, Drug development and industrial pharmacy.

[16]  H Leuenberger,et al.  New trends in the production of pharmaceutical granules: the classical batch concept and the problem of scale-up. , 2001, European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V.

[17]  R. Bro Review on Multiway Analysis in Chemistry—2000–2005 , 2006 .

[18]  P. Frake,et al.  Process control and end-point determination of a fluid bed granulation by application of near infra-red spectroscopy , 1997 .

[19]  R. Bro Exploratory study of sugar production using fluorescence spectroscopy and multi-way analysis , 1999 .

[20]  A. K. Biń,et al.  The batch granulation process in a fluidised bed , 1985 .

[21]  M. Hussain,et al.  Fluid bed granulation of a poorly water soluble, low density, micronized drug: comparison with high shear granulation. , 2002, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[22]  Theodora Kourti,et al.  Application of latent variable methods to process control and multivariate statistical process control in industry , 2005 .

[23]  P. C. Knight Challenges in granulation technology , 2004 .

[24]  Rasmus Bro,et al.  Multi‐way models for sensory profiling data , 2008 .

[25]  M. Viana,et al.  Multiphase versus Single Pot Granulation Process: Influence of Process and Granulation Parameters on Granules Properties , 2006, Drug development and industrial pharmacy.

[26]  Theodora Kourti,et al.  Multivariate dynamic data modeling for analysis and statistical process control of batch processes, start‐ups and grade transitions , 2003 .

[27]  Denita Winstead,et al.  Understanding and predicting bed humidity in fluidized bed granulation. , 2008, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[28]  O. Antikainen,et al.  Effect of fluidisation activity on end-point detection of a fluid bed drying process. , 2008, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[29]  R. Bro,et al.  Practical aspects of PARAFAC modeling of fluorescence excitation‐emission data , 2003 .

[30]  H Leuenberger,et al.  New trends in the production of pharmaceutical granules: batch versus continuous processing. , 2001, European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V.