Embodiment and abstraction: Actions create relational representations

Theories of embodied, modal representation propose that concepts are grounded in the sensorimotor system. According to these theories, action (or the potential for action) creates meaning. An apparent challenge for these theories is the fact that higher-order relations (i.e., relations among relations), such as monotonic increase or alternation, have no straightforward sensorimotor analog. A single action can increase or alternate only relative to another action. Therefore, if embodied theories are to handle concepts more generally, patterns of action must provide meaning to the system. Previous research suggested that as participants simulated the motion of gear problems they discovered a higher-order relation, alternation, based on the episodic traces of their own alternating actions. The present study showed that the number of alternating actions in episodic memory prior to discovery of the alternation relation predicted its generalization to new problem types. Actions can function as the representational substrate of higher-order relations.

[1]  Michael P. Kaschak,et al.  Grounding language in action , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[2]  Ashley S. Bangert,et al.  The prehistory of discovery: precursors of representational change in solving gear system problems. , 2002, Developmental psychology.

[3]  Douglas L. Hintzman,et al.  "Schema Abstraction" in a Multiple-Trace Memory Model , 1986 .

[4]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Seeing, acting, understanding: motor resonance in language comprehension. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[5]  A. Newell Unified Theories of Cognition , 1990 .

[6]  Stephan Lewandowsky,et al.  Error-driven knowledge restructuring in categorization. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[7]  Gordon D Logan,et al.  An instance theory of attention and memory. , 2002, Psychological review.

[8]  Lawrence W. Barsalou,et al.  Abstraction as dynamic interpretation in perceptual symbol systems , 2005 .

[9]  Roberto Araya,et al.  A computational model of conscious and unconscious strategy discovery. , 2005, Advances in child development and behavior.

[10]  M. Hegarty Mechanical reasoning by mental simulation , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[11]  James A Dixon,et al.  Redescription disembeds relations: Evidence from relational transfer and use in problem solving , 2003, Memory & cognition.

[12]  Michael P. Kaschak,et al.  Constructing Meaning: The Role of Affordances and Grammatical Constructions in Sentence Comprehension , 2000 .

[13]  S. Goldinger,et al.  Episodic memory reflected in printed word naming , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[14]  Richard Catrambone,et al.  The effects of surface and structural feature matches on the access of story analogs. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[15]  G. Lakoff,et al.  The Brain's concepts: the role of the Sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge , 2005, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[16]  Lawrence W. Barsalou,et al.  Representing Properties Locally , 2001, Cognitive Psychology.

[17]  J. Singer,et al.  Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis , 2003 .

[18]  S. Goldinger Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. , 1998, Psychological review.

[19]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Listening to action-related sentences modulates the activity of the motor system: a combined TMS and behavioral study. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.