Police transport versus ground EMS: A trauma system-level evaluation of prehospital care policies and their effect on clinical outcomes

BACKGROUND Rapid transport to definitive care (“scoop and run”) versus field stabilization in trauma remains a topic of debate and has resulted in variability in prehospital policy. We aimed to identify trauma systems frequently using a true “scoop and run” police transport approach and to compare mortality rates between police and ground emergency medical services (EMS) transport. METHODS Using the National Trauma Databank (NTDB), we identified adult gunshot and stab wound patients presenting to Level 1 or 2 trauma centers from 2010 to 2012. Hospitals were grouped into their respective cities and regional trauma systems. Patients directly transported by police or ground EMS to trauma centers in the 100 most populous US trauma systems were included. Frequency of police transport was evaluated, identifying trauma systems with high utilization. Mortality rates and risk-adjusted odds ratio for mortality for police versus EMS transport were derived. RESULTS Of 88,564 total patients, 86,097 (97.2%) were transported by EMS and 2,467 (2.8%) by police. Unadjusted mortality was 17.7% for police transport and 11.6% for ground EMS. After risk adjustment, patients transported by police were no more likely to die than those transported by EMS (OR = 1.00, 95% CI: 0.69–1.45). Among all police transports, 87.8% occurred in three locations (Philadelphia, Sacramento, and Detroit). Within these trauma systems, unadjusted mortality was 19.9% for police transport and 13.5% for ground EMS. Risk-adjusted mortality was no different (OR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.68–1.50). CONCLUSIONS Using trauma system-level analyses, patients with penetrating injuries in urban trauma systems were found to have similar mortality for police and EMS transport. The majority of prehospital police transport in penetrating trauma occurs in three trauma systems. These cities represent ideal sites for additional system-level evaluation of prehospital transport policies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic/epidemiologic study, level III.

[1]  Samuel M. Galvagno,et al.  Increased mortality associated with EMS transport of gunshot wound victims when compared to private vehicle transport. , 2014, Injury.

[2]  Rama A Salhi,et al.  Severity-adjusted mortality in trauma patients transported by police. , 2014, Annals of emergency medicine.

[3]  E. Mackenzie,et al.  Developing best practices to study trauma outcomes in large databases: An evidence-based approach to determine the best mortality risk adjustment model , 2014, The journal of trauma and acute care surgery.

[4]  T. Esposito,et al.  Trauma deserts: distance from a trauma center, transport times, and mortality from gunshot wounds in Chicago. , 2013, American journal of public health.

[5]  Kent A Stevens,et al.  Influence of the National Trauma Data Bank on the study of trauma outcomes: is it time to set research best practices to further enhance its impact? , 2012, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[6]  D. Chang,et al.  Prehospital Intravenous Fluid Administration Is Associated With Higher Mortality in Trauma Patients: A National Trauma Data Bank Analysis , 2011, Annals of surgery.

[7]  M. Seamon,et al.  Prehospital procedures before emergency department thoracotomy: "scoop and run" saves lives. , 2007, The Journal of trauma.

[8]  C. A. Wright.  A National Evaluation of the Effect of Trauma-center Care on Mortality , 2006 .

[9]  Thomas M Scalea,et al.  Endotracheal intubation in the field does not improve outcome in trauma patients who present without an acutely lethal traumatic brain injury. , 2003, The Journal of trauma.

[10]  J. Sampalis,et al.  Advanced or basic life support for trauma: meta-analysis and critical review of the literature. , 2000, The Journal of trauma.

[11]  K. Hennigan,et al.  Emergency medical services (EMS) vs non-EMS transport of critically injured patients: a prospective evaluation. , 2000, Archives of surgery.

[12]  J. Hedges,et al.  Does out-of-hospital EMS time affect trauma survival? , 1995, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[13]  R. Fischer,et al.  The importance of prompt transport of salvage of patients with penetrating heart wounds. , 1982, The Journal of trauma.

[14]  L. Jacobs.  The Hartford Consensus III: Implementation of Bleeding Control: If you see something do something. , 2015, Bulletin of the American College of Surgeons.

[15]  T. Esposito,et al.  Pre-hospital transport times and survival for Hypotensive patients with penetrating thoracic trauma , 2013, Journal of emergencies, trauma, and shock.

[16]  B. Carr,et al.  Injury-adjusted mortality of patients transported by police following penetrating trauma. , 2011, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[17]  D. Chang,et al.  Spine immobilization in penetrating trauma: more harm than good? , 2010, The Journal of trauma.