Testing for the presence of some features of increasing returns to adoption factors in energy system dynamics: An analysis via the learning curve approach

The purpose of this paper is to explain the sources of energy system lock-in. It presents a comparative analysis of the respective contributions of some features of increasing returns to adoption factors, i.e. learning-by-doing, learning-by-searching and returns to scale effects in explaining the technological change dynamics in the energy system. The paper is technically based on a critical analysis of the learning curve approach. Econometric estimation of learning and scale effects inherent to seven energy technologies were performed by the use of several learning curve specifications. These specifications permit to deal with some crucial issues related to the learning curve estimation which are associated with the problem of omitted variable bias, the endogeneity effects and the choice of learning indicators. Results show that dynamic economies from learning effects coupled with static economies from scale effects are responsible for the lock-in phenomena of the energy system. They also show that the magnitude of such effects is correlated with the technology life cycle (maturity). In particular, results point out that, 1) the emerging technologies exhibit low learning rates associated with diseconomies of scale which are argued to be symptomatic of the outset of the deployment of new technologies characterized by diffusion barriers and high level of uncertainty, 2) the evolving technologies present rather high learning rates meaning that they respond quickly to capacity expansion and R&D activities development, 3) conventional mature technologies display low learning rates but increasing returns to scale implying that they are characterized by a limited additional diffusion prospects.

[1]  W. Brian Arthur,et al.  Path-dependent processes and the emergence of macro-structure , 1987 .

[2]  Lawrence R. Klein An Introduction To Econometrics , 1962 .

[3]  A. Walters Production and Cost Functions: An Econometric Survey , 1963 .

[4]  Wim Turkenburg,et al.  Global experience curves for wind farms , 2005 .

[5]  Werner Z. Hirsch,et al.  Manufacturing Progress Functions , 1952 .

[6]  G. Dosi Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories: A Suggested Interpretation of the Determinants and Directions of Technical Change , 1982 .

[7]  Leo Schrattenholzer,et al.  Learning rates for energy technologies , 2001 .

[8]  Paul D. Maycock,et al.  Business analysis of solar photovoltaic energy conversion , 1975 .

[9]  H. White A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity , 1980 .

[10]  Peter Holmes Kobos,et al.  Technological learning and renewable energy costs: implications for US renewable energy policy , 2004 .

[11]  C. Granger Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods , 1969 .

[12]  Marc Nerlove,et al.  RETURNS TO SCALE IN ELECTRICITY SUPPLY , 1961 .

[13]  José Goldemberg The evolution of ethanol costs in Brazil , 1996 .

[14]  Arnulf Grubler,et al.  Technological change and the timing of mitigation measures , 1998 .

[15]  T. Breusch TESTING FOR AUTOCORRELATION IN DYNAMIC LINEAR MODELS , 1978 .

[16]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Economies of Scale and the Form of the Production Function. , 1972 .

[17]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Production Functions in Manufacturing: Some Preliminary Results , 1967 .

[18]  Ian Sue Wing,et al.  Representing induced technological change in models for climate policy analysis , 2006 .

[19]  Ulrik Jørgensen,et al.  Energy sector in transition - technologies and regulatory policies in flux , 2005 .

[20]  W. Fuller,et al.  Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root , 1979 .

[21]  C. Harmon,et al.  Experience Curves of Photovoltaic Technology , 2000 .

[22]  G. Dosi Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories , 1993 .

[23]  W. Arthur,et al.  INCREASING RETURNS AND LOCK-IN BY HISTORICAL EVENTS , 1989 .

[24]  Chihiro Watanabe,et al.  Industrial dynamism and the creation of a “virtuous cycle” between R&D, market growth and price reduction: The case of photovoltaic power generation (PV) development in Japan , 2000 .

[25]  S. Isoard,et al.  Endogenous learning in world post-Kyoto scenarios: application of the POLES model under adaptive expectations , 2000 .

[26]  Murray Brown,et al.  The theory and empirical analysis of production , 1969 .

[27]  L. Godfrey,et al.  REGRESSION EQUATIONS WHEN THE REGRESSORS INCLUDE LAGGED DEPENDENT VARIABLES , 1978 .

[28]  Theocharis Tsoutsos,et al.  The sustainable diffusion of renewable energy technologies as an example of an innovation-focused policy , 2005 .

[29]  Asami Miketa,et al.  The impact of R&D on innovation for wind energy in Denmark, Germany and the United Kingdom , 2005 .

[30]  J. Fisher,et al.  Energy crises in perspective , 1974 .

[31]  Antonio Soria,et al.  Modelling energy technology dynamics: methodology for adaptive expectations models with learning by doing and learning by searching , 2000 .

[32]  W. Arthur,et al.  The Economy as an Evolving Complex System II , 1988 .

[33]  Wim Turkenburg,et al.  Technological learning in bioenergy systems , 2006 .

[34]  S. D. Probert,et al.  Likely market-penetrations of renewable-energy technologies , 1998 .

[35]  Patrik Söderholm,et al.  Empirical challenges in the use of learning curves for assessing the economic prospects of renewable energy technologies , 2007 .

[36]  Patrik Söderholm,et al.  Wind Power in Europe: A Simultaneous Innovation–Diffusion Model , 2007 .

[37]  Maya Papineau,et al.  An economic perspective on experience curves and dynamic economies in renewable energy technologies , 2006 .

[38]  Robert Fildes,et al.  The practice of econometrics: Classical and contemporary: Ernst R. Berndt, (Addison-Wesley Publishing company, Reading, Mass., 1991), pp. 702, $18.95 , 1992 .

[39]  M. Lieberman The Learning Curve and Pricing in the Chemical Processing Industries , 1984 .

[40]  S. Kahouli-Brahmi Technological learning in energy–environment–economy modelling: A survey , 2008 .

[41]  L. Argote,et al.  Learning Curves in Manufacturing , 1990, Science.

[42]  Leo Schrattenholzer,et al.  Learning curves and technology assessment , 2002, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[43]  Antonio Soria,et al.  Technical change dynamics: evidence from the emerging renewable energy technologies , 2001 .

[44]  W. Fuller,et al.  LIKELIHOOD RATIO STATISTICS FOR AUTOREGRESSIVE TIME SERIES WITH A UNIT ROOT , 1981 .

[45]  G. Dosi,et al.  Technical Change and Economic Theory , 1989 .

[46]  Lena Neij,et al.  Use of experience curves to analyse the prospects for diffusion and adoption of renewable energy technology , 1997 .

[47]  T. P. Wright,et al.  Factors affecting the cost of airplanes , 1936 .

[48]  Michael Grubb,et al.  The Transition to Endogenous Technical Change in Climate-Economy Models: A Technical Overview to the Innovation Modeling Comparison Project , 2006 .

[49]  J. Hausman Specification tests in econometrics , 1978 .

[50]  P. Phillips,et al.  Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: How sure are we that economic time series have a unit root? , 1992 .

[51]  Eytan Sheshinski,et al.  Tests of the "Learning by Doing" Hypothesis , 1967 .

[52]  A. Alchian Reliability of Progress Curves in Airframe Production , 1963 .

[53]  Ernst R. Berndt,et al.  The Practice of Econometrics: Classic and Contemporary. , 1992 .

[54]  K. Arrow The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing , 1962 .

[55]  C. Wene Experience Curves for Energy Technology Policy , 2000 .

[56]  Lena Neij,et al.  Cost dynamics of wind power , 1999 .