Basic principles for the development of an AI-based tool for assistive technology decision making.

INTRODUCTION The impact of assistive technology use on the lives of people with disabilities has long been demonstrated in the literature. Despite the need for assistive technologies, and a wealth of innovative, afford-able, and accessible products, a low rate of assistive technology uptake is globally maintained. One of the reasons for this gap is related to data and knowledge formation and management. Low access to information and a lack of assessment services is evident. Fragmentation of data, inconsistency in assessment methodology and heterogeneity in the competence of assistive technology professionals, has led to a growing interest in the opportunities that data sciences, including AI, hold for the future of the assistive technology sector, as a supportive and constructive mechanism in any decision-making process. OBJECTIVES In this short paper, we seek to describe some of the principles that such an AI-based recommendation system should be built upon, using the Atvisor platform as a case study. Atvisor.ai is an AI-based digital platform that supports assistive technology assessments and the decision-making process. RECOMMENDATIONS Our recommendations represent the aggregated insights from two pilots held in Israel, testing the platform in multiple environments and with different stakeholders. These recommendations include ensuring the continuum of care and providing a full user journey, incorporating shared decision making and self-assessment features, providing data personalisation and a holistic approach, building a market network infrastructure and designing the tool within a wider service delivery model design. Assessment and decision-making processes, crucial to optimal uptake, cab be leveraged by technology to become more accessible and personalised. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION Provides principles for the development of an AI-based recommendation system for assistive technology decision making. Promotes the use of artificial intelligence to support users and professionals in the assistive technology decision making process. Personalization of data regarding assistive technology, according to functional, holistic and client centered profiles of users, ensures optimal match and better use of assistive technology. Self-assessment and professional assessment components are important for enabling multiple access points to the assistive technology decision making process, based on the preferences and needs of users.

[1]  Thomas H Mercer,et al.  Walking measures to evaluate assistive technology for foot drop in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review of psychometric properties. , 2018, Gait & posture.

[2]  T Claire Davies,et al.  Systematic review: Investigating the effectiveness of assistive technology to enable internet access for individuals with deafblindness , 2019, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[3]  Karla K. McGregor,et al.  Assistive technology interventions for adolescents and adults with learning disabilities: An evidence-based systematic review and meta-analysis , 2017, Comput. Educ..

[4]  Luc de Witte,et al.  Assistive technology provision: towards an international framework for assuring availability and accessibility of affordable high-quality assistive technology , 2018, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[5]  M. Scherer The change in emphasis from people to person: introduction to the special issue on Assistive Technology , 2002, Disability and rehabilitation.

[6]  J. Jutai,et al.  A framework for modelling the selection of assistive technology devices (ATDs) , 2007, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[7]  David Banes A commentary on influences on selection of assistive technology for young children in South Africa: perspectives from rehabilitation professionals , 2019, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[8]  A. Vanbiervliet,et al.  Predictors of assistive technology use: The importance of personal and psychosocial factors , 2005, Disability and rehabilitation.

[9]  Marcia J Scherer,et al.  Systems thinking for assistive technology: a commentary on the GREAT summit , 2018, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[10]  Stephen Brewster,et al.  The efficacy of cognitive prosthetic technology for people with memory impairments: A systematic review and meta-analysis , 2014, Neuropsychological rehabilitation.

[11]  Stefano Federici,et al.  Providing assistive technology in Italy: the perceived delivery process quality as affecting abandonment , 2016, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[12]  Kathryn Oliver,et al.  Effectiveness of assistive technology in improving the safety of people with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2019, Aging & mental health.

[13]  Pamela Gallagher,et al.  The impact of assistive technology use for students with disabilities in higher education: a systematic review , 2021, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[14]  David Banes Pervasive and Emerging Technologies and Consumer Motivation , 2019, Everyday Technologies in Healthcare.

[15]  Sajay Arthanat,et al.  A survey of assistive technology service providers in the USA , 2017, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[16]  Daniel Marinho Cezar da Cruz,et al.  Assistive Technology Accessibility and Abandonment: Challenges for Occupational Therapists , 2016 .