Progress in U.S. Fusion Safety and Environmental Activities over the Last Decade

Abstract Magnetic fusion energy has the potential for superior safety and environmental (S&E) characteristics relative to other energy options, which is one of the main reasons for developing fusion power. Excellent progress has been made in understanding the nature of the S&E concerns associated with fusion power and in demonstrating the S&E potential of fusion. Over the past 10 yr, U.S. fusion S&E activities have been largely focused on the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER). The design of ITER is such that the hazards addressed are similar to those of a future fusion power plant; hence, many of the safety issues addressed by ITER are relevant to commercial fusion power plants. This paper reviews the progress and accomplishments in fusion S&E activities performed largely in support of ITER over the past decade and discusses future directions in fusion safety design criteria development and implementation; characterization of the radioactive and hazardous materials in fusion and the potential energy sources that could mobilize those materials during an accident; integrated state-of-the-art safety and risk analysis tools, methods, and results; and development of environmental design criteria for radioactive and hazardous fusion waste minimization as well as the evaluation of recycle/reuse potential of fusion materials.

[1]  M. Groth,et al.  Tritium recycling and retention in JET , 1999 .

[2]  Massimo Zucchetti,et al.  Management Strategy to Reduce the Radioactive Waste Amount in Fusion , 1997 .

[3]  David A. Petti,et al.  ITER Safety: Lessons Learned for the Future , 1998 .

[4]  C. García-Rosales,et al.  Hydrogen trapping in and release from tungsten: Modeling and comparison with graphite with regard to its use as fusion reactor material , 1997 .

[5]  M. L. Corradini,et al.  Liquid metal chemical reaction safety in fusion facilities , 1987 .

[6]  J. Roth,et al.  Release of Deuterium from Carbon-Deuterium Films on Beryllium during Carbide Formation and Oxidation , 1997 .

[7]  D. K. Murdoch,et al.  Tritium inventory issues for future reactors : choices, parameters, limits , 1999 .

[8]  A. A. Haasz,et al.  Tritium inventory in the ITER PFC's: Predictions, uncertainties, R&D status and priority needs , 1998 .

[9]  R. T. Santoro,et al.  Experimental validation of calculations of decay heat induced by 14 MeV neutron activation of ITER materials , 1999 .

[10]  B. John Garrick,et al.  The approach to risk analysis in three industries: nuclear power, space systems, and chemical process , 1988 .

[11]  Tomoaki Kunugi,et al.  Analyses for Passive Safety of Fusion Reactor during Ex-Vessel Loss of Coolant Accident , 1995 .

[12]  S. Piet,et al.  Fusion safety and environmental performance goals , 1989 .

[13]  W. Carmack,et al.  Particle size distribution of dust collected from Alcator C-MOD , 1998 .

[14]  E. Cheng.  Concentration limits of natural elements in low activation fusion materials , 1998 .

[15]  W. Wampler,et al.  Tritium retention in tungsten exposed to intense fluxes of 100 eV tritons , 1998 .

[16]  David A. Petti,et al.  Volatilization from PCA steel alloy , 1996 .

[17]  R. German.  A measure of the number of particles in agglomerates , 1996 .

[18]  S. C. Jardin,et al.  Coolant Ingress Induced Disruption Calculations for ITERa , 1991 .

[19]  M. Zucchetti.  Impurity Concentration Limits and Activation in Fusion Reactor Structural Materials , 1991 .

[20]  W. Houlberg,et al.  Fuel source isotopic tailoring and its impact on international thermonuclear experimental reactor design, operation, and safety , 1995 .

[21]  A. Poucet,et al.  ITER principal safety functions: radiological confinement, heat removal, and shutdown , 1995, Proceedings of 16th International Symposium on Fusion Engineering.

[22]  David A. Petti,et al.  Decay heat removal in the ITER outline design , 1996 .

[23]  W. Wampler,et al.  Tritium retention and removal on TFTR , 1997, 17th IEEE/NPSS Symposium Fusion Engineering (Cat. No.97CH36131).

[24]  E. Cheng.  Waste management aspect of low activation materials , 2000 .

[25]  Michael L. Corradini,et al.  Lithium alloy chemical reactivity with reactor materials: current state of knowledge , 1991 .

[26]  A. A. Haasz,et al.  In-vessel tritium retention and removal in ITER-FEAT , 1998 .

[27]  David A. Petti,et al.  The ultimate safety margins of ITER: a demonstration of the safety potential of fusion , 1999 .

[28]  Lee C. Cadwallader,et al.  Selected component failure rate values from fusion safety assessment tasks , 1998 .

[29]  Massimo Zucchetti,et al.  Advanced management concepts for fusion waste , 1998 .

[30]  W. Wampler,et al.  Comparison of the thermal stability of the codeposited carbon/hydrogen layer to that of the saturated implant layer , 1990 .

[31]  C. Ferro,et al.  CHARACTERIZATION OF EROSION DUST AND TRITIATED PRODUCTS INSIDE THE JET VESSEL AFTER THE FIRST TRITIUM EXPERIMENT , 1993 .

[32]  Brad J. Merrill,et al.  Reaction of porous beryllium in steam , 1992 .

[33]  David A. Petti,et al.  Safety Analysis Results for ITER In-Vessel Loss of Coolant Events , 1997 .

[34]  R. J. Pawelko,et al.  Steam chemical reactivity of plasma-sprayed beryllium , 1998 .

[35]  L. C. Cadwallader,et al.  Identification of postulated accident sequences in ITER , 1997, 17th IEEE/NPSS Symposium Fusion Engineering (Cat. No.97CH36131).

[36]  G. Longhurst,et al.  Deuterium Transport and Trapping in Polycrystalline Tungstena , 1992 .

[37]  J. Holdren,et al.  Safety and Environmental Aspects of Fusion Energy , 1991 .

[38]  G. Smolik.  Tungsten alloy oxidation behavior in air and steam: Fusion Safety Program/activation products task , 1992 .

[39]  David A. Petti,et al.  Hydrogen generation from steam reaction with tungsten , 1998 .

[40]  Tatsuhiko Uda,et al.  Comprehensive safety analysis code system for nuclear fusion reactors I: Model and analyses of overpower events for the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor , 1994 .

[41]  B. Kolbasov,et al.  BERYLLIUM INTERACTION WITH STEAM OR AIR IN ITER UNDER ACCIDENT CONDITIONS , 1998 .

[42]  Ronald Allen Knief.  Risk Management: Expanding Horizons In Nuclear Power And Other Industries , 1991 .

[43]  William R. Wampler,et al.  Hydrogen isotope retention in beryllium for tokamak plasma-facing applications , 1999 .

[44]  G. R. Smolik,et al.  A summary and assessment of oxidation driven volatility experiments at the INEL and their application to fusion reactor safety assessments , 1994 .

[45]  Neil Mitchell,et al.  Magnet Safety Assessment for ITER , 1997 .

[46]  G. R. Smolik,et al.  Oxidation and volatilization of a niobium alloy , 1992 .

[47]  R. J. Pawelko,et al.  Steam-Chemical Reactivity Studies for Irradiated Beryllium , 1997 .

[48]  Maria Teresa Porfiri,et al.  ITER Reference Accidents , 1998 .

[49]  M. L. Laucks.  Aerosol Technology Properties, Behavior, and Measurement of Airborne Particles , 2000 .

[50]  David A. Petti,et al.  An overview of safety and environmental considerations in the selection of materials for fusion facilities , 1996 .

[51]  A. T. Peacock,et al.  Dust and flakes in the JET MkIIa divertor, analysis and results , 1999 .

[52]  R. J. Pawelko,et al.  Tokamak Dust Particle Size and Surface Area Measurement , 1998 .

[53]  Steve Fetter,et al.  Initial Integration of Accident Safety, Waste Management, Recycling, Effluent, and Maintenance Considerations for Low-Activation Materials , 1991 .

[54]  Collection and analysis of particulate from the DIII-D Tokamak , 1998 .

[55]  David A. Petti,et al.  The safety implications of tokamak dust size and surface area , 1998 .

[56]  I. Cook,et al.  Safety and environment aspects of a fusion power reactor , 1999 .

[57]  R. Doerner,et al.  Growth of redeposited carbon and its impact on isotope retention properties on tungsten in a high flux deuterium plasma , 1999 .

[58]  L. Di Pace,et al.  Validation and verification of ITER safety computer codes , 1997, 17th IEEE/NPSS Symposium Fusion Engineering (Cat. No.97CH36131).