ECOLOGICAL BOUNDARY-SETTING IN MENTAL AND GEOPHYSICAL MODELS

2 Project Summary When agencies and the public direct their attention to an environmental problem, they explicitly or implicitly bound that problem by associating it with a particular system at a particular scale. Proposed research will focus on the problem formulation phase of the decision process and on the role of spatial modeling in that process. The objectives of this research center on identification of modeling approaches that identify and clarify environmental problems in public decision making. Two aspects of such problems are: (1) the boundary and scale decisions made by geophysical modelers in their attempt to represent the system of concern; and (2) the mental and cultural processes by which stakeholders identify temporal and spatial boundaries in the process of formulating and articulating a shared concern. The latter processes are hypothesized to be shaped by individual and social values that invigorate the public to respond to an environmental problem. A framework for understanding and articulating these values will inform the formal modeling process undertaken by those attempting to resolve shared resource problems. Two key types of values will be emphasized: (a) " sense of place values " —values that residents associate with a locality; and (b) spatial dimensions of equity issues, as private and public decisions may create differentials in the quality of life within and across physical and political boundaries. Sense of place is hypothesized in the context of experiential discounting as critical to the development of individual and social identities that frame the way environmental problems are experienced, informally bounded, and formulated. Similarly, values derived from relative social status are important in determining the spatial boundaries used to characterize and articulate environmental problems. Three case study areas, where team members have established a research presence, have been chosen to apply this framework: comparative lens will be used to examine formulation of three types of environmental problems: sprawling land use patterns, management of water quality and quantity, and brownfield redevelopment. A variety of methods will be developed and employed to study the processes by which individuals and interest groups identify, articulate, and modify perceived boundaries of environmental problems. Selected methods of garnering information about stakeholders' mental models include elicitation of perceptions through interviews, discourse analysis of documents, and revealed preference valuation. These methods will be combined with the use of agent-based GIS modeling techniques to represent such information geographically and to provide linkages between social scientific data and …

[1]  Linda Heath,et al.  Applications of Heuristics and Biases to Social Issues , 2013 .

[2]  Laurence J. O'Toole,et al.  Participation and the Quality of Environmental Decision Making , 2012 .

[3]  K. Wester What is an acceptable risk? , 2012, World neurosurgery.

[4]  Pamela Davidson,et al.  Demographics of dumping ii: a national environmental equity survey and the distribution of hazardous materials handlers , 2000, Demography.

[5]  Andy B. Anderson,et al.  Environmental Equity: The Demographics of Dumping , 1994, Demography.

[6]  M. Korstanje The Risk Society: Towards a new modernity , 2009 .

[7]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk — Source link , 2007 .

[8]  C. S. Holling Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management , 2005 .

[9]  Catherine Dibble,et al.  The GeoGraph 3D Computational Laboratory: Network and Terrain Landscapes for RePast , 2004, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[10]  David W. S. Wong The Modifiable Areal Unit Problem (MAUP) , 2004 .

[11]  Deborah G. Martin,et al.  “Place-Framing” as Place-Making: Constituting a Neighborhood for Organizing and Activism , 2003 .

[12]  Shivanand Balram,et al.  Integrating Geographic Information Systems and Agent-Based Modeling Techniques for Simulating Social and Ecological Processes , 2003, The Professional Geographer.

[13]  詳子 斎藤,et al.  Value-Focused Thinking の拡張とその応用 , 2003 .

[14]  Y. LindaJ. Combining Incompatible Spatial Data , 2003 .

[15]  M. B. Beck,et al.  Developing a Concept of Adaptive Community Learning: Case Study of a Rapidly Urbanizing Watershed , 2002 .

[16]  R. Gregory,et al.  Incorporating Value Trade-offs into Community-Based Environmental Risk Decisions , 2002, Environmental Values.

[17]  Luc Anselin,et al.  Under the hood , 2002 .

[18]  Jan Rotmans,et al.  Integrated assessment: current practices and challenges for the future , 2002 .

[19]  Bryan G. Norton,et al.  Searching for Sustainability: Interdisciplinary Essays in the Philosophy of Conservation Biology , 2002 .

[20]  A. Bright,et al.  Public Attitudes Toward Ecological Restoration in the Chicago Metropolitan Region , 2002 .

[21]  B. Johnson Risk Communication: A Mental Models Approach , 2002 .

[22]  Robin Gregory,et al.  Using decision analysis to encourage sound deliberation: water use planning in British Columbia, Canada , 2002 .

[23]  Glenn L. Christensen,et al.  Mapping consumers' mental models with ZMET , 2002 .

[24]  Bill McKelvey,et al.  Foundations of “new” social science: Institutional legitimacy from philosophy, complexity science, postmodernism, and agent-based modeling , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  J Swanson,et al.  Business Dynamics—Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World , 2002, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[26]  PETER W. DOWNS,et al.  Post-Project Appraisals in Adaptive Management of River Channel Restoration , 2002, Environmental management.

[27]  D. Gill,et al.  Units of analysis and the environmental justice hypothesis: The case of industrial hog farms , 2002 .

[28]  D. Coursey,et al.  The locality of waste sites within the city of Chicago: a demographic, social, and economic analysis , 2002 .

[29]  W. Bowen,et al.  The Politics and Reality of Environmental Justice: A History and Considerations for Public Administrators and Policy Makers , 2002 .

[30]  A. Steinemann,et al.  Environmental Values and Adaptive Management , 2001, Environmental Values.

[31]  V. Smith Spatial Delineation and Environmental Economics: Discussion , 2001 .

[32]  Luc Anselin,et al.  Spatial Effects in Econometric Practice in Environmental and Resource Economics , 2001 .

[33]  R. Gregory,et al.  Decision Aiding, Not Dispute Resolution: Creating Insights through Structured Environmental Decisions , 2001 .

[34]  John Buchanan,et al.  Dynamic decision problem structuring , 2001 .

[35]  L. L. Bennett,et al.  Valuing Open Space and Land-Use Patterns in Urban Watersheds , 2001 .

[36]  B. Hannon,et al.  An Introduction to Spatial Discounting , 2001 .

[37]  Larry Keating,et al.  Atlanta: Race, Class And Urban Expansion , 2001 .

[38]  S. Funtowicz,et al.  Science for the PostNormal Age , 2001 .

[39]  G. Machlis The Politics of Ecosystem Management , 2000 .

[40]  Michael Meyer,et al.  Methods of text and discourse analysis , 2000 .

[41]  B. Norton Pragmatism, Adaptive Management, and Sustainability , 1999 .

[42]  Marjolein B.A. van Asselt,et al.  Integrated assessment of sustainable development: multiple perspectives in interaction , 1999 .

[43]  George Wright,et al.  Rethinking value elicitation for personal consequential decisions , 1999 .

[44]  J. Rotmans Methods for IA: The challenges and opportunities ahead , 1998 .

[45]  Joe Ravetz,et al.  Integrated assessment models - from global to local , 1998 .

[46]  David N. Ford,et al.  Mental models concepts for system dynamics research , 1998 .

[47]  Mordechai I. Henig,et al.  Objectivity and subjectivity in thedecision making process , 1998, Ann. Oper. Res..

[48]  J Moffat,et al.  Developing models of decision making , 1997 .

[49]  Stephen H. Schneider,et al.  Integrated assessment modeling of global climate change: Transparent rational tool for policy making or opaque screen hiding value‐laden assumptions? , 1997 .

[50]  Paul B. Thompson,et al.  Integrated ecological models: simulation of socio-cultural constraints on ecological dynamics , 1997 .

[51]  G. Zaltman Rethinking Market Research: Putting People Back In , 1997 .

[52]  M. Morris Understanding Risk - Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society , 1997 .

[53]  L. Kruger Environmental Values in American Culture , 1997 .

[54]  Dale S. Rothman,et al.  growing pains: a conceptual framework for considering integrated assessments , 1997 .

[55]  Ann Taket,et al.  Wanted: Dead OR alive—ways of using problem-structuring methods in community OR , 1997 .

[56]  N. Bockstael Modeling Economics and Ecology: The Importance of a Spatial Perspective , 1996 .

[57]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Value-Focused Thinking , 1996 .

[58]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Using Values in Planning Wastewater Facilities for Metropolitan Seattle , 1996 .

[59]  Marjolein B.A. van Asselt,et al.  Uncertainty in integrated assessment: A social scientific perspective , 1996 .

[60]  Mordechai I. Henig,et al.  SOLVING MCDM PROBLEMS: PROCESS CONCEPTS , 1996 .

[61]  Noel A Cressie,et al.  Change of support and the modifiable areal unit problem , 1996 .

[62]  B. Norton Why I am Not a Nonanthropocentrist: Callicott and the Failure of Monistic Inherentism , 1995 .

[63]  Shlomo Zilberstein,et al.  Models of Bounded Rationality , 1995 .

[64]  R. Gregory,et al.  Creating policy alternatives using stakeholder values , 1994 .

[65]  K. Shrader-Frechette Environmental Risk, Environmental Values, and Political Choices: Beyond Efficiency Trade-offs in Public Policy Analysis. Edited By John Martin Gillroy. Boulder: Westview, 1993. 189p. $42.00 paper. , 1994, American Political Science Review.

[66]  Hanna J. Cortner,et al.  Trends and issues in land and water resources management: Setting the agenda for change , 1994 .

[67]  David R. Holtgrave,et al.  Heuristics, Biases, and Environmental Health Risk Analysis , 1994 .

[68]  Robin Gregory,et al.  Valuing environmental resources: A constructive approach , 1993 .

[69]  Gustavo Stubrich The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization , 1993 .

[70]  H. Raiffa,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives , 1993 .

[71]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  COMMUNICATING RISK TO THE PUBLIC , 1992 .

[72]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Valuing public goods: The purchase of moral satisfaction , 1992 .

[73]  S. Funtowicz,et al.  Three types of risk assessment and the emergence of post-normal science , 1992 .

[74]  B. English Ecological Economics: The Science and Management of Sustainability , 1991 .

[75]  William Cronon,et al.  Nature’s Metropolis: Chicago and the Great West by William Cronon (review) , 1991, Technology and Culture.

[76]  S. Funtowicz,et al.  A New Scientific Methodology for Global Environmental Issues , 1991 .

[77]  Jerome R. Ravetz,et al.  Uncertainty and Quality in Science for Policy , 1990 .

[78]  Barbara M. Carlin,et al.  Problem structuring heuristics in strategic decision making , 1990 .

[79]  Giuseppe Arbia,et al.  Spatial Data Configuration in Statistical Analysis of Regional Economic and Related Problems , 1989 .

[80]  R. Keeney Building models of values , 1988 .

[81]  Takeshi Murota,et al.  Environmental economics : the analysis of a major interface , 1987 .

[82]  Carl J. Walters,et al.  Adaptive Management of Renewable Resources , 1986 .

[83]  Division on Earth Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process , 1983 .

[84]  Student,et al.  PSYCHOLOGY OF PREFERENCES , 1982, Pediatrics.

[85]  Michael Pidd,et al.  Problem Structuring — A Literature Review , 1981 .

[86]  Po-Lung Yu,et al.  Second-order game problem: Decision dynamics in gaming phenomena , 1979 .

[87]  Y. Tuan,et al.  Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience. , 1978 .

[88]  H. Simon,et al.  Models of Discovery : and other topics in the methods of science , 1977 .

[89]  I. Janis,et al.  Decision Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice, and Commitment , 1977 .

[90]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  The Structure of "Unstructured" Decision Processes , 1976 .

[91]  H. Rittel,et al.  Dilemmas in a general theory of planning , 1973 .

[92]  H. Simon,et al.  A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice , 1955 .

[93]  E. Rowland Theory of Games and Economic Behavior , 1946, Nature.

[94]  B. Norton Environmental Values: A Place-Based Theory , 2022 .