Modularisation in two Global Product Developing Companies – Current State and Future Outlook

Modularisation and platform strategies enable efficient utilization of resources through economies of scale and are therefore increasingly important for manufacturing companies. On the product side, modules are often considered the basis of product platforms by enabling a variety of product variants by combining interchangeable modules into different products. On the pro-cess side, modularisation enables faster and cheaper development of new product variants by reusing physical components, interfaces, and production equipment. The benefits of product platforms and modularisation have led two global product developing and manufacturing companies to initiate research projects within this field. The companies have previously made unsuccessful attempts to implement modularisation founded on a component-based approach and the firms are now searching for other methods to get the benefits of modularisation. This paper describes the initial state of practice in modularisation and product platforms in the two companies in their attempts to move from a purely physical approach to modularisation into the universal view that is presented in the Design Platform approach. Here, a platform is viewed as an evolutionary entity involving several company assets such as processes, knowledge, methods, and relationships which are essential to gain the benefits of platforms also in the development phase. The Design Platform contains various concrete resources such as the geometry of physical components, but also in homogeneous resources such as design rules, pro-cesses, methods and design automation. The results point to specific barriers that the companies experience when trying to adopt a mod-modularisation strategy. Several barriers are experienced by both companies while some are specific for one of the companies. Through several workshops, the concepts of the Design Platform and a flexible view on modularisation are introduced, and their possibilities are elaborated and ap-preciated by the workshop participants.

[1]  Mohanbir Sawhney,et al.  Leveraged high-variety strategies: From portfolio thinking to platform thinking , 1998 .

[2]  Claudia Eckert,et al.  The spiral of applied research: A methodological view on integrated design research , 2003 .

[3]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm , 2011 .

[4]  Eun Suk Suh,et al.  Architectural decomposition: The role of granularity and decomposition viewpoint , 2014 .

[5]  Johannes I.M. Halman,et al.  Platform driven development of product families: Linking theory with practice , 2001 .

[6]  Kevin Otto,et al.  MODULAR PLATFORM-BASED PRODUCT FAMILY DESIGN , 2000 .

[7]  Mark J. Deck Product strategy for high-technology companies: How to achieve growth, competitive advantage, and increased profits , 1995 .

[8]  Marc H. Meyer,et al.  The power of product platforms : building value and cost leadership , 1997 .

[9]  Mats Näsström,et al.  Efficient Design Module Capture and Representation for Product Family Reuse , 2017, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[10]  Fredrik Börjesson Modular Function Deployment Applied to a Cordless Handheld Vacuum , 2014 .

[11]  Lucienne Blessing,et al.  DRM, a Design Research Methodology , 2009 .

[12]  Joel Johansson,et al.  The design platform – a coherent platform description of heterogeneous design assets for suppliers of highly customised systems , 2017 .

[13]  Gunnar Erixon Modular function deployment , 1998 .

[14]  Joel Johansson,et al.  Supporting design platforms by identifying flexible modules , 2017 .

[15]  K. Ulrich,et al.  Planning for Product Platforms , 1998 .

[16]  Linda L. Zhang,et al.  A literature review on multitype platforming and framework for future research , 2015 .

[17]  Zahed Siddique,et al.  Product platform and product family design : methods and applications , 2010 .

[18]  Michel Tollenaere,et al.  Modular and platform methods for product family design: literature analysis , 2005, J. Intell. Manuf..