A New TDR-Based Sensing Cable for Improving Performance of Bridge Scour Monitoring

The use of time domain reflectometry (TDR) for real-time monitoring of bridge scour process has gone through several stages of development. The recently-proposed concept of bundled TDR sensing cable, in which two sets of insulated steel strands are twisted around and connected to a central coaxial cable to form a compact sensing cable, is a major change that has several advantages including the bottom-up sensing mechanism. Nevertheless, there is big room for improving its measurement sensitivity and signal to noise ratio (SNR). Changes in waveguide configuration also need to be made to avoid the adverse effect of insulation abrasion observed in field implementation. This study evaluated three new conductor and insulator configurations for constructing the sensing waveguide, including a balanced two-conductor waveguide (Type I), an unbalanced three-conductor waveguide with insulation coating on the middle conductor (Type II) and an unbalanced three-conductor with insulation coating on the two outer conductors (Type III). In all cases, the spacing between the two sets of steel strands (i.e., the waveguide conductors) was especially enlarged by replacing some steel strands with non-conductor wires to increases measurement sensitivity and avoid shorted conditions due to insulation abrasion. Experimental results show that Type III has the best performance on all counts. A new improved TDR sensing cable was hence proposed based on Type III configuration. Its performance was further evaluated by a full-scale experiment to take into consideration the long range of measurement in most field conditions. Detailed discussions on improvements of measurement sensitivity and SNR, limitation of sensing range, and mitigating the adverse effect of insulation abrasion are presented.

[1]  Chih‐Ping Lin,et al.  A bundled time domain reflectometry‐based sensing cable for monitoring of bridge scour , 2019, Structural Control and Health Monitoring.

[2]  George W. Annandale Risk Analysis of River Bridge Failure , 1993 .

[3]  Christophe Chevalier,et al.  Distributed Optical Fiber-Based Approach for Soil–Structure Interaction , 2020, Sensors.

[4]  Vikram Pakrashi,et al.  Scour Damage Detection and Structural Health Monitoring of a Laboratory-Scaled Bridge Using a Vibration Energy Harvesting Device , 2019, Sensors.

[5]  Quan Gao,et al.  Design and evaluation of a high sensitivity spiral TDR scour sensor , 2015 .

[6]  A. P. Annan,et al.  Electromagnetic determination of soil water content: Measurements in coaxial transmission lines , 1980 .

[7]  Sreenivas Alampalli Infrastructure Health in Civil Engineering: Applications and Management , 2011 .

[8]  Chih-Ping Lin,et al.  New types of time domain reflectometry sensing waveguides for bridge scour monitoring , 2017 .

[9]  Chih-Ping Lin,et al.  Comprehensive wave propagation model to improve TDR interpretations for geotechnical applications , 2007 .

[10]  Kevin M. O'Connor,et al.  GeoMeasurements by Pulsing TDR Cables and Probes , 1999 .

[11]  L. Zabilansky,et al.  LABORATORY INVESTIGATION OF TIME-DOMAIN REFLECTOMETRY SYSTEM FOR MONITORING BRIDGE SCOUR , 1999 .

[12]  Chih-Ping Lin,et al.  Applicability and limitations of time domain reflectometry bridge scour monitoring system in general field conditions , 2020 .

[13]  J. Baker,et al.  THE SPATIAL SENSITIVITY OF TIME‐DOMAIN REFLECTOMETRY , 1989 .

[14]  Bin Zhang,et al.  A new time-domain reflectometry bridge scour sensor , 2013 .

[15]  J. Lai,et al.  Field Measurements and Simulation of Bridge Scour Depth Variations during Floods , 2008 .

[16]  S. Zegelin,et al.  Improved field probes for soil water content and electrical conductivity measurement using time domain reflectometry , 1989 .

[17]  S. Jones,et al.  A Review of Advances in Dielectric and Electrical Conductivity Measurement in Soils Using Time Domain Reflectometry , 2003 .

[18]  REsuLiis DiGEsT INSTRUMENTATION FOR MEASURING SCOUR AT BRIDGE PIERS AND ABUTMENTS , 1993 .

[19]  J. Knight Sensitivity of time domain reflectometry measurements to lateral variations in soil water content , 1992 .

[20]  Daniele Zonta,et al.  Electromagnetic Sensors for Underwater Scour Monitoring , 2020, Sensors.

[21]  Jean-Louis Briaud,et al.  SRICOS: Prediction of Scour Rate in Cohesive Soils at Bridge Piers , 1999 .